ASUC officials unite in strongly-worded opposition to auxiliary realignment

One day before a major transition for the ASUC’s administrative branch officially took effect, both the incoming and outgoing ASUC Senate classes came together to write a letter in strong opposition to the change, referring to the process as a “breach of our trust” and stating that the relationship between the ASUC and the campus is “tarnished before the academic term has commenced.”

Similarly, a resolution was unanimously approved by the outgoing senate Thursday citing “extreme disappointment that the Administration rapidly forced through this transition.” Both the letter and the resolution demand a Memorandum of Understanding — a document which explicitly states an agreement between parties — to address student concerns with the transition process.

These actions oppose the shift of the oversight of the ASUC Auxiliary from Administration and Finance to the campus Division of Student Affairs, a change which became official July 1. The decision was made almost two months ago, and though the campus has said the transition is occurring at this time because it coincides with the start of the campus’s fiscal calendar, the student government has been critical of the timing since many students are not on campus.

Furthermore, the resolution also expresses concern with the “immediate and rather enigmatic leave” of ASUC Auxiliary Director Nadesan Permaul, who retired June 29 after 33 years of employment at UC Berkeley.

A primary concern illustrated in the letter and resolution addresses the Commercial Activities Agreement between the UC Board of Regents and the ASUC which created the ASUC Auxiliary, dated March 19, 1998. The resolution refers to the Auxiliary’s reorganization as a “breach of spirit and good faith of the CAA.”

“The Auxiliary shall not undertake any function not directly related to ASUC Student Activities or ASUC Commercial Activities,” the agreement states.

While the senate classes acknowledge in the letter that such a transition for the Auxiliary may occur under the agreement, they also refer specifically to the intent of the agreement, stating that it was founded on the principle of creating an Auxiliary which manages solely ASUC commercial and business activities.

“Therefore, this transition not only is a clear breach of our trust and faith in our university’s administration, but also has forced us to reconsider whether this university shares or even cares for the core mission of the ASUC to serve the students as an autonomous student government,” the letter states.

But campus administrators maintain that the purpose of the realignment is to improve the functionality of the Auxiliary, though the full effects of the transition are not yet known.

“The transition team will conduct an assessment of the Auxiliary,” said Felicia Lee, chief of staff for the Office of Student Affairs, in an email. “The overall goal of the realignment was  … to better support the Auxiliary in delivering services to its constituents.”

As a result of the transition, the auxiliary reports to Jonathan Poullard, assistant vice chancellor for student affairs and dean of students. However, Graduate Assembly President Bahar Navab said a better fit would be to house the Auxiliary as its own unit reporting directly to Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Harry Le Grande.

“There are other ways to achieve what they want without going against what students want,” Navab said.

Both senate documents also specifically take issue with a conflict of interest they state would occur when the Student Advocate’s Office — which advises students in matters of student conduct — is too closely related to the Center for Student Conduct and Community Standards, which pursues student conduct violations and is housed under student affairs.

“The ASUC Auxiliary under (Administration and Finance) is like water and oil, and was set up that way intentionally to maintain separation,” said Cooperative Movement Senator Elliot Goldstein in an email. “By moving the Auxiliary under Student Affairs it is like water and water, and can be mixed easily — not knowing where one begins and the other ends.”

According to Student Advocate Samar Shah, an immediate conflict of interest would not be present because his office’s operations are not effected by those of the Auxiliary, though he said the overall transition “goes completely against what the intent of the Auxiliary was.”

“Some people in the administration are exploiting this opportunity to expropriate authority from the ASUC and students,” Goldstein said in the email. “However, the students have more leverage over the situation then you might suspect, and the administration needs to be careful in how they’re treating us.”

Allie Bidwell and J.D. Morris are news editors.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Anonymous

    and when the “realignment” was announced,
    Le Grande tried to make the play like it was no big deal,
    he “hopes” students understand they don’t have to “fight” w/Student Affairs,
    but the track record…  shows Student Affairs administrators to be habitual liars,

    they lie to the press, the public, to students about their rights under the law, they lie in student conduct hearings about what did or didn’t happen, they bring in UCPD to lie in student conduct hearings when the DA found the same statements to lack evidentiary value (or does the UCPD sometimes blink before lying to the DA?), they have UCPD file false police reports and testify to their validity in conduct hearings, they send UCPD out to lie to students about university policy and about state laws, to conduct surveillance against students and student groups on multiple campuses w/o probably cause, w/o a warrant, taking action that is expressly forbidden by the state constitution, illegally evicting students from privately owned housing in violation of state law… the list is very long

    The UC, its administrators and its police force, show they have no respect or regard for the law, for the true recounting of events, for common sense, for moral or even common decency.
    Is their behavior the result of individual and collective psychotic break?
    Or is it simply willful self-delusion?

  • Letters are good to make us aware of what’s going on, but JD- are there any concrete steps /action steps that were included in the letter?  Stating reasons as to why we should keep it under the department of Administration and Finance?  Is there a statement from Jonathan Poullard as to why he thinks having the Auxiliary under Student Affairs would benefit the ASUC/student body more than keeping it in Administration and Finance?

    I mean…let’s think about this…Nad is leaving and our pub is losing us money, the ASUC is going to be in a tough financial spot…the last thing we need is to separate ourselves from the department of Administration and Finance….either propose a joint-oversight or just be aggressive in getting a meeting ASAP and negotiate or at least get some clear, cut reasons as to why the move…also, if the issue is with SAO..I think this year’s SAO-elect should be sending out a letter straight from their office within the next few days objecting to this transition, backed by all of the other elected officials..but it should also be supported by talking about the financial implications, ect, ect. 

    Good Luck