A recent study by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research identified that the rise in college tuition stems from the ways in which traditional colleges and universities organize and allocate resources, and not lavish university facilities and extra student services.
The author, Oklahoma State University professor Vance Fried, stated in the paper, which was published June 24, that research was an essential part of some universities, but since did not contribute much to an undergraduate’s education, said the universities needed to make sure research costs did not translate into increased tuition fees.
“Higher education insiders sometimes point to the increasing cost of auxiliary services like student housing and big-time athletics as a major cause of large tuition increases. This is a red herring,” Fried said in a statement. “Football, good food, and hot tubs are not the reason for runaway college spending. Rather, the root cause is the high cost of performing the instructional, research, and public-service missions of the undergraduate university.”
One particular reason for rising tuition costs identified in the study was funding for research at universities.
Graham Fleming, the vice chancellor of research at UC Berkeley, told ABC News that despite the economic pressures the public universities were experiencing, eliminating research was not an option.
The news comes on top of increasing difficulty among UC campuses in retaining faculty members. According to a report issued to the UC Board of Regents in January 2011, more UC faculty members have been leaving to work at other universities, one main reason being that private universities are able to offer higher salaries.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

BASED ON HIS PAST STATEMENTS, CAN’T TAKE GRAHAM FLEMING SERIOUSLY
GRAHAM FLEMING’s ABSURD LIE: he thinks faculty pay cuts are good for research.
However, Fleming said effects of the furlough program on research are still unclear.
“Faculty don’t work nine-to-five, five days a week,” he said. “My
guess is what most faculty will do on a furlough day is research. It
may even help research.”
http://archive.dailycal.org/article/107167/despite_cuts_research_keeps_uc_berkeley_in_public_
GRAHAM FLEMING, beloved defender of BP (worst safety record in the industry).
http://archive.dailycal.org/article/109926/uc-bp_partnership_more_important_now_than_ever
BP’s record:
http://www.businessinsider.com/bp-has-been-fined-by-osha-760-times-has-an-awful-track-record-for-safety-2010-6
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/bps-dismal-safety-record/story?id=10763042
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/17/national/main6491769.shtml
http://onespot.wsj.com/business/2010/06/06/a/639660922-bp-violations-and-spills/
Re the rest of today’s article:
now that AEI has a report, DC sees fit to write an article on the matter,
on the other hand, several faculty from UC have been discussing this publicly for some time and DC has been silent on the subject…
http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2010/08/who_pays_the_hidden_cost_of_un.html
http://changinguniversities.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-uc-calculates-instructional-cost.html
Tuition increases at University of California come from sped thrift Chancellors. Until action is applied by the University of California (UC) Board of Regents to chancellors, like Birgeneau, UC shouldn’t come to the Governor or public for support for any tax increase.
(The author has 35 years’ consulting experience, has taughtat UC Berkeley (Cal)
where he observed the culture & way senior management work)
Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau ($500,000 salary)
has forgotten that he is a public servant, steward of the public money, not
overseer of his own fiefdom (these are not isolated examples): recruits (uses
California tax $) out of state $50,000 tuition students that displace qualified
Californians from public university education; spends $7,000,000 + for
consultants to do his & many vice chancellors jobs (prominent East Coast university accomplishing same 0 cost); pays
ex Michigan governor $300,000 for lectures; in procuring a $3,000,000 consulting firm he failed to receive
proposals from other firms; Latino enrollment drops while out of state
jumps 2010; tuition to Return on
Investment drops below top 10; Birgeneau all employees meeting – only 50
attend; visits to Cal down 20%; NCAA places basketball program on probation,
absence institutional control.
It’s all shameful. There is no justification for such violations by a steward of the public trust. Absolutely none.
Birgeneau’s violations will continue indefinitely. Governor Brown, UC Board of Regents Chair Lansing, President Yudof must do a better job of vigorously enforcing stringent oversight than has been done in the past over Chancellors like Birgeneau who use the campus as their fiefdom.