Campus revokes recognition of fraternity

The campus revoked its recognition of the UC Berkeley chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon on July 15 following repeated student conduct, social code and risk management violations and failure to comply with prior sanctions.

The fraternity had previously been under a state of stayed revocation — a probationary period often resorted to before installing a final revocation — since January 2008 and had eight incidents in the last year in which the campus Code of Student Conduct was violated, according Amanda Carlton, director of student involvement for the campus Center for Student Leadership.

“After a period of time in which there have been multiple violations, we attempt many different courses before revocation,” Carlton said. “It is not very common, but we try our best to make sure the chapters are in alignment with university policy.”

According to Carlton, the incidents all occurred at the chapter’s house on Bancroft Way and involved fire safety violations and failure to follow guidelines for serving alcohol.

“Because the fraternity had eight violations in the last year, from July 2010 to July 2011, (the Center for Student Conduct and Community Standards) offered a resolution to the fraternity as a final step towards revocation,” Carlton said.

Chapter president Daniel Meyer accepted this resolution as an informal revocation on July 15, and as a result, the UC Berkeley chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon is no longer endorsed by the campus. Additionally, the chapter cannot apply to be re-granted recognition for another four years.

Meyer declined to comment on the situation with the fraternity, stating in an email that any publicity in which the chapter participates needed to be cleared by the national organization.

National representatives from Sigma Alpha Epsilon could not be reached for comment.

Because the fraternity is no longer recognized by the campus, it cannot access campus-supported funding opportunities or participate in campuswide or all-Greek events put on by CalGreeks, Carlton said.

She added that the members and alumni of the fraternity as well as national organization affiliates cannot recruit members on campus for another four years.

Since 2005, the campus has revoked recognition of campus chapters of seven fraternities and one sorority, Alpha Kappa Delta Phi, for reasons including fire and safety violations, social code violations and repeated risk management violations.

Since then, only one fraternity, Pi Alpha Phi, has regained recognition from the campus after its revocation period was over.

In order to reapply for recognition, leaders of the campuswide chapter and national organization as well as alumni must begin talks with both the staff at the Fraternity and Sorority Life unit of the Division of Student Affairs and leaders from the campus Interfraternity Council after the chapter has complied with the terms of its revocation.

David Lopez, president of the campus Interfraternity Council, declined to comment on the situation with Sigma Alpha Epsilon, stating in an email that discussing the matter would have to be deferred to the campus.

According to Carlton, the process for establishing or rechartering a fraternity or sorority chapter is more involved than starting a student organization.

“We hold fraternities and sororities to higher standards, because they have a sponsored relationship with the university,” she said.

Amruta Trivedi covers academics and administration.

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

7

Archived Comments (7)

  1. Anonymous says:

    remind us again why we should believe UC takes anything related to conduct at frats seriously at all?  b/c not too long ago it was revealed that citizens on the south side begged UCOP for a year to take some action and couldn’t even get a response.
    http://archive.dailycal.org/article/107881/berkeley_residents_to_bring_lawsuit_against_campus
    http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2010-01-21/article/34496?headline=Southside-Neighbors-File-Lawsuit-Against-University-Fraternities

    “repeated risk management violations”
    yeah, UC knows all about that, nothing like a Board full of ultra-wealthy financial sophisticates buying mortgage backed securities in 2007 just months before the implosion of both the financial sector and the housing market. hilarious except it wasn’t their personal money it was UC’s money

  2. Worker says:

    And yet all the coops keep operating, despite much more serious problems. Student Affairs is much more interested in their lefty worldview than they are in serving students.

  3. Anonymous says:

    University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau ($500,000 salary)
    has forgotten that he is a public servant, steward of the public money, not
    overseer of his own fiefdom. These are not isolated examples: recruits (uses
    California tax $) out of state $50,000 tuition students that displace qualified
    Californians from public university education; spends $7,000,000 + for
    consultants to do his & many vice chancellors jobs (prominent East Coast university accomplishing same 0 cost); pays
    ex Michigan governor $300,000 for lectures; in procuring a $3,000,000 consulting firm he failed to receive
    proposals from other firms; Latino enrollment drops while out of state
    jumps 2010; tuition to Return on Investment drops below top 10; QS academic
    ranking falls below top 10; only 50 attend Birgeneau all employees meeting;
    visits down 20%; NCAA places basketball program on probation, absence
    institutional control.

     

    It’s all shameful. There is no justification for such violations
    by a steward of the public trust. Absolutely none.  

     

    Birgeneau’s violations continue. Governor Brown, UC Board of
    Regents Chair Lansing must do a better job of vigorously enforcing stringent oversight
    than has been done in the past over Chancellor Birgeneau who uses the campus as
    his fiefdom.

     

     

  4. Guest says:

    NO GREEK WEEK OR GREEK CARNIVAL?! GOD FORBID! JUST GIVE UP NOW SAE, GIVE UP NOW! 

    More importantly, when will the entire system be free of the plague that is the university administration?

  5. guest says:

    OHHH NO!!!! NO GREEK WEEK??????????? 

  6. Guest says:

    “because they have a sponsored relationship with the university”
    Why should they?  Who needs them?  Privatize the whole system and sever any relations with UC.

    • Anonymous says:

      frats already private, so derp-de-doo,
      or did you mean privatize the UC, then severe the UC from itself,
      b/c that makes about as much sense as what you actually said,
      but I digress, the point is – as always – UBTROLLIN’