The art of the long view: seeing UC futures

08/26 Editorial Illustration
Deanne Chen/Staff

This week marks the fortieth anniversary of Chez Panisse, the legendary Berkeley restaurant that pioneered the Slow Food movement that has now prompted Americans to desire seasonal, local, organic, whole foods. The “mother” of Chez Panisse, Alice Waters, credits her student experiences at UC Berkeley as inspiration. She was among a group of countercultural activists who found their vision for sustainable agriculture on Sproul Plaza in the heady days of the Free Speech Movement.

What might have seemed at the time an idealistic, impractical pipe dream became four decades later a popular, widespread, economically viable movement. The rise of farmers’ markets, community gardens and Edible Schoolyards in public schools can be traced, in part, to UC Berkeley and its students’ capacity for invention. There is much to learn by revisiting this history, not just as a nostalgic walk down memory lane. This history is a reminder that paradigm shifts happen through creativity and collective invention, with protest and rejection of a status quo only part of a much larger process.

We begin the 2011-12 academic year with the inauspicious news that for the first time in the University of California’s history, students are contributing more than the public to the cost of their education. With the specter of continuing budgetary shortfalls and tuition hikes looming, students are likely to be paying even more by year’s end. UC Berkeley and UCLA are admitting unprecedented numbers of out-of-state students, their full tuition payments backfilling the state’s fiscal withdrawal. What exactly is it that makes the University of California “public?” And how is our university “of” California when campuses now receive so little of their overall operating expenses from the state — at Berkeley as low as 12 percent?

These are big, fundamental, long-range questions. We ask them in a climate of instability and duress. It appears that higher education — not just in California, but also nationally and globally — is undergoing a profound paradigm shift the likes of which we have not seen for at least 50 years. The simultaneous emergence of higher education’s first great technological change in five centuries — the digital revolution — only compounds our instability, for this is yet one more mobile tectonic plate.

The 2011-12 year is likely to see many political flashpoints: tuition increases, layoffs, organizational restructuring, a rise of “permatemp” lecturers, challenges to shared governance, a further erosion of the ties that once bound UC’s world renowned system. Students may have difficulty getting classes; the wheels of Operational Excellence will roll along to a destination widely proclaimed yet remarkably ill-defined (i.e. how will we know when we are “excellent?”). Protest actions, with their attendant Twitter feeds, will inevitably pull us into a myopic fixation on the present. The battlegrounds will be multiple and dynamic.

Yet protests won’t make a future. Neither will managerial exercises in efficiency. Our needs far transcend what either the flash mob or organizational restructuring can produce. We need a big rethink about the future of higher education. The last great paradigm shift in higher education happened half a century ago with the University of California its epicenter. Can we once again be a leader?

The scale of our current challenges is formidable, its contours complex, its inner workings opaque. Unlike the last great period of innovation in higher education, the signs are not auspicious. The present has neither unprecedented prosperity nor the expansive vision that marked former UC President Clark Kerr’s era and the 1960 California Master Plan for Higher Education.

Today a new design for higher education is unlikely to come from on high, and it’s unlikely to come from one man. The future of higher education — if it is to be bright — may well require collective invention. It may require the very sort of collaborative ingenuity and original thinking that gave rise to the Slow Food movement, a product of Berkeley’s soil.

If you have walked by the Berkeley Art Museum this week, you may have noticed corn growing outside. Yes, corn. This is a sign that the artists’ collective OPENrestaurant has taken up residence with their new project “OPENed: Education as Experience.” On Saturday, Aug. 27 from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m., they will transform the museum into an open classroom and living kitchen, tracing the history of Chez Panisse and pointing to alternative strategies, new and historical, for the future of education. They invite us to inaugurate the new academic year by looking into our past in order to envision our future. They invite us to cultivate, not just corn, but also the art of the long view.

Catherine Cole is a professor in the Department of Theater, Dance and Performance Studies at UC Berkeley.

  • Gagmewithaseededbaguette

    Of course!  Why didn’t I think of it before?  Alice WATERS will save public education!  She seems awfully busy cultivating her celebrity status, but clearly her sycophants can help her get a leg up.

    The tin-eared, smug complacency of this piece will likely fit the new Cal.  The Cal whose differential tuition is now “inevitable,” per Chancellor Birgeneau.

    Food as art: charming.  Meanwhile, more and more members of the Cal community are wishing they were able to put some food-as-food on their tables.  Better put a fence around that corn stalk at BAM.

    “Protest actions, with their attendant Twitter feeds, will inevitably
    pull us into a myopic fixation on the present…Yet protests won’t make a future.”

    Honey, that is just too stupid.  So cavalier.  Only those who are comfortable now and plan to stay comfortable can afford this “long view” you attempt to describe.  Those little people you see running around in the foreground being fixated on the present are making your comfortable life possible.

  • Anonymous

    UC Berkeley Californians treated as second class applicants. UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau displaces qualified for public education at Cal Californians with $50,600 Foreign and out of state students.
    More on the deploring wasteful decisions of Chancellor Birgeneau’s leadership?

    Like any addiction,
    admitting you have a problem is the first step toward correcting it. University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau
    ($500,000 salary) has forgotten he is a public servant, steward of the public money,
    not overseer of his own fiefdom.

    Tuition,
    fee increases exceed national average rate of increase under Birgeneau      

    Recruits
    (using California tax $) out of state, foreign
    $50,600 students who displace qualified sons, daughters of Californians from Cal.

    Spends
    $7,000,000 + for consultants to do his & vice chancellors work      

    (Prominent East Coast
    University accomplishing same 0 cost).

    University accrues $150 million of
    inefficiencies over his 8 year reign.

    Pays: ex Michigan governor
    $300,000 for lectures.

    In procuring $3,000,000 consultant failed
    to receive proposals from other firms.

    Latino
    enrollment drops out of state jump 2010(M Krupnick Contra Costa Times)

    Best in nation rank: # 70 Forbes

    Academic rank: QS academic falls below top ten.

    Tuition to
    Return on Investment drops below top 10.

    Cal most expensive USA
    public university

    NCAA: absence
    senior management oversight, basketball program on probation.

     

    These
    are not isolated examples: it’s all shameful. There is no justification for
    such irregularities by a steward of the public trust. Absolutely none. 

     

    Birgeneau’s spend thrift practices
    will not change. University of California Board of Regents Chair Sherry Lansing
    must do a better job of vigorously enforcing financial oversight of Birgeneau
    who treat’s Cal.
    as his fiefdom. Only then will confidence of Alumni, donors begin to improve.

     

    My
    agenda is transparency. I have 35 years’ consulting experience; have taught at
    UC Berkeley, where I observed the culture & the way senior management works.
    No, I was not fired or downsized & have not solicited contracts from UC/Cal.

     

    Email opinion to   [email protected]

    • Sick of Milian

      You post the same nonsense day after day, Milan. We are all tired of your broken English and unsupported statistics. You need to get a life.

      • Anonymous

        Transparency to the facts is THE  goal sick of milan… what is nonsense to you are facts to others: no one asks the you read my comments; OTHERS HOWEVER HAVE FOUND THE COMMENTS EDUCATIONAL

        I did my homework on the internet to identify the facts. Do your home work and you too will discover the fact about the deplorable wasteful decision of UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau.

        shooting the messanger does not CHANGE THE internet documents statistics and FACTS

        STICKS AND STONES WILL BREAK MY BONES BUT BEING CALLED NAMES FUELS MY MOTIVATION

        I LOVE YOU TOO, sick of Milan!

        • Worker

          Way to give away the secret, Milan. From that last rant, we know ‘perspective2′ is also you.

          Please stop. You’re making it too easy for the administration to dismiss us all as paranoid nuts.

          • Moravecglobal

            Shooting the messanger does not change any of the facts in the comments if they were made by Milan or Sarah or Irene etc. OK guess but wrong!

            The administration like all in denial prefer to call people who provide the public with transparency paranoid nuts: it is as if that changed the bald transparent facts of  the incompetence of  the senior management of Cal.

            Transparency for Californians is improving the knowledge base on which Californians can make decisions about how tax dollars are abused by Cal senior management.

            And now Cal senior management will blame perspective 2  transparency for not  providing salary increases for workers.

            I wish you success worker!

        • Guest

          “does not CHANGE THE internet documents statistics and FACTS”
          If the internet is your primary source, you guarantee that most of what you post is bullshit.  Use statistics that are verifiable.

          • Anonymous

            All statistics are bs when they do not agree the point you are trying to make

            UC faculty are generously paid otherwise the turnover would not be as  increadibly low as it has been and will be.

            UC is the most expensive public University in the USA!

            And faculty increases will make UC even more expensive than it is for Californians.

          • Guest

            “UC is the most expensive public University in the USA!”
            Please stop spouting nonsense.  UC isn’t even the most expensive of the four schools we commonly compare ourselves to.  See Display 19 here:
            http://budget.ucop.edu/documents/2011-12/Nov2010-UC%20Budget.pdf

          • Anonymous

            You stick to your statistics and I’ll stick to mine. At least my statistics are independent while yours are produced or supported by UC.

            UC’s salaries must align with California’s ability to pay and the depressed California wages

            Faculty, Chancellors, Vice chancellors, President volunteer wage concessions to align with Californians economy pain.

            If Chancellors, Vice Chancellors Provosts, Faculty President can get better paing  jobs elsewhere leave !

            Turnover at UC in among the lowest of all public universities in USA.

            We will not miss you!

            Good luck in finding a better paying job than you have at UC

          • Guest

            “At least my statistics are independent while yours are produced or supported by UC.”
            What is the source of your statistics?  How can they be verified?

  • Guest

    If you want to know what Sacramento intends for us, start here:
    http://lao.ca.gov/reports/2011/stadm/infrastructure/infrastructure_082511.pdf

    The section on higher education begins on page 30.

  • Worker

    Prof Cole’s commitment to undergrads would be more credible if she actually taught some regular courses sometime. Like Nader, Barsky & others who complain but don’t do anything, she just teaches grad students & special topics. Check it out in the schedule of classes. Maybe a good Daily Cal article there.

  • Moravecglobal

    Did you all know that Cal Chancellor Birgeneau displaces qualified for public university education at Cal Californians for $50,600 foreign and out of town students ( none of the bs that tha’s good for Californians)

    Californians treated as second class by the leadership of Chancellor Birgeneau

    email your opinion to the UC Board of Regents   [email protected]

  • Stan De San Diego

    I’ll be impressed with the sincerity of all you slow-food, locally-grown types once you give up such treats as coffee, tea, and chocolate, NONE of which are native to the SF Bay Area or anywhere else in California. Until then, I will regard these people as a bunch of self-absorbed hypocritical twits, the type who preach “do as I say, not as I do”…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

    How many students can afford to eat at Chez Panisse, the French Laundry, or these other places you insufferable trendies peddle incessantly? Top Dog and the local pizza-by-the-slice outlets are far more typical of what the average Cal undergrad will eat on a regular basis…

  • Johndecker8888

    Why is this article even relevant to students?

  • Snarkboojum

    “dictator jokes aside, Waters’s influence on how
    America approaches food, farming and cooking is indisputable. Cynicism
    is easy and creates nothing new. But an entire industry has changed
    thanks to Chez Panisse.” 
    –http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robin-wilkey/why-alice-matters_b_937495.html

    • Johndecker8888

      Come on, who cares?

  • Snarkboojum

    “Ahhh, high school cafeterias. Remember all those gourmet, organically
    farmed mustard greens? Can you still picture the juicy, locally sourced
    smoked pulled chicken baguette sandwiches?

    Since we haven’t relocated our public schools to another galaxy yet,
    you probably can’t.

    But those mouthwatering and totally non-cafeteria-grade items will be
    on the menu at a “School Lunch” hosted by Levi’s and Chez Panisse’s Alice Waters. . . .

    The event is part of Waters’ Edible
    Schoolyard Project, which aims to improve the quality of food at
    public schools and educate students about food through hands-on work.

    The program began in Berkeley but recently launched “a national
    initiative to develop and share edible education curriculum” online,
    spokesman David Prior says.”
    –http://blogs.sfweekly.com/foodie/2011/08/edible_schoolyard_brings_local.php

    http://edibleschoolyard.org/berkeley/about-us

  • Anonymous

    Cal ranked #70 by forbes is now the most expensive public university in the uSA!. And now Chancellor Birgeneau wants to make University of California Berkeley more expensive by providing increases to generously paid faculty.

    email your opinion to UC board of regents  [email protected]

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Beverly-Berrish/1635334433 Beverly Berrish

    bev berrish and sher send congrats!   bevidevi

  • Anonymous

    Cal ideals are easy; living up to them isn’t. Students suffer
    Evelyn Botti wrote, “Every qualified student should get a place in the college/university system.” That’s a desirable goal for a public university. However, UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau displaces qualified Californians with $50,600 foreign and out-of-state students.
    UC tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increase. The University of California Board of Regents jeopardizes Californians attending higher education by making UC the most expensive public university in the United States.
    Self-serving tuition increases are used by UC President Mark Yudof to increase the pay of 80,000 eligible faculty and others. Payoffs like these point to higher operating costs and still higher tuition for Californians.
    I agree that faculty in higher education and senior management, like Yudof and Birgeneau, should consider the students’ welfare and put it high on their values.
    Deeds unfortunately do not bear out the students’ welfare values of senior management and the UC Board of Regents.