Educating undocumented students is an important reflection of our public mission in economically-challenging times

undocumented
Patricia Kim/Staff

With the passage of AB 540 in 2001, the state of California allowed any students who had spent at least three years in a California secondary school, graduated and earned admission to college to be treated as Californians paying resident tuition. The legislators responsible for AB 540 recognized that many undocumented students who are products of California’s education system were brought here as young children not knowing that they did not have proper legal status. These talented and ambitious young people have earned the opportunity to attend college and deserve to be treated justly and fairly.

However, while enabling undocumented students to pursue a public education In California, the Legislature stopped short of making any provision for financial aid, without which the expenses of attending are too onerous for many. UC Berkeley’s tuition is $11,200, and the total cost of attending is as much as $32,600 per year. This is insurmountable for the vast majority of undocumented students. By comparison, their fellow California residents from families with low incomes who qualify for aid are required to contribute as little as $8,000 to their education through work-study and loans.

Thanks to the leadership of Assemblymember Gil Cedillo, two bills, AB 130 and AB 131, were put forward in the Legislature that would allow financial support for undocumented students.

I personally traveled to Sacramento to testify on behalf of both bills with Mr. Cedillo and witnessed our legislators moved by the testimony of many undocumented students as they talked about their hopes and dreams for higher education and the hardships and challenges that they encountered. The principles behind AB 130 and 131 reflect UC Berkeley’s institutional identity as an engine of social and economic mobility, providing access and affordability that allows promising students of exceptional caliber to pursue higher education.

AB 130 was recently passed and signed into law by Gov. Brown. It enables all students who qualify for nonresident tuition exemption to be eligible to compete for scholarships that are paid for with private donor funds awarded by the university, beginning on Jan. 1, 2012. I have already made an approach for private support to a foundation that is a leader in social justice issues and believes in enabling all people to reach their full potential, as do we at UC Berkeley.

AB 131, which was passed by the legislature and is on its way to Gov. Brown’s desk, will further level the playing field by making undocumented students eligible for state funding such as Cal Grants, effective January 2013. If the bill is enacted, as we have every reason to believe that it will UC estimates that approximately 800 undergraduate students eligible under AB 540 would meet the requirements for participation in the Cal Grant Entitlement program. While it is impossible to determine exactly how many undocumented students who are eligible for need-based financial aid attend UC Berkeley, our best estimates indicate that we have approximately 60.

California can take the lead in helping to reframe the national conversation on investing in undocumented students. Rather than representing a financial loss for the state, these students will have the opportunity to contribute to the economic and social vitality of California. Supporters of AB 540 are exploring ways in which these students, once they graduate, can find legal employment, thereby ensuring that they are integrated into California’s professional community, are able to put their degrees to good use and are one step closer to citizenship. I recently had the opportunity to speak to President Obama directly about the DREAM Act. He emphasized that California cannot afford to waste one single talented person and that as a nation, we must not neglect individuals who can become tremendous assets to the United States.

UC Berkeley has been a state and national leader in addressing issues of equity, access and affordability. That tradition is only strengthened in times of economic hardship — we have more low-income students attending UC Berkeley today than at any time in our history. We are proud of our public mission to serve all Californians, including helping those talented, economically disadvantaged undocumented students who through their merit have earned a place at UC Berkeley.

Robert J. Birgeneau is the chancellor of UC Berkeley.

  • Guest

    “UC Berkeley’s tuition is $11,200, and the total cost of attending is as
    much as $32,600 per year. This is insurmountable for the vast majority
    of undocumented students. By comparison, their fellow California
    residents from families with low incomes who qualify for aid are
    required to contribute as little as $8,000 to their education through
    ork-study and loans.”

    UC Berkeley’s cost of attendance, $32,600 per year  after tax dollars  is insurmountable for students who hail from California’s middle class who are legal citizens.  That is why only 7.5% of UC students come from families making between $80,000 and $120,000 per year…
    http://i52.tinypic.com/2hn3jnc.jpg
    ….even though over 50% of UC eligible students are  from families in this income range, and that was before the increase in costs of the past two years influenced college choice decisions. $32,600 represents anywhere from one half to one third of the after tax income of a family in the $80,000 – $120,000  income range. Until something is done about making UC once again a viable  education choice for students from California middle class families, nothing  should go to  illegal aliens- the root cause  of California’s budgetary  woes, and the reason that UC is now unaffordable. Offering illegal aliens even more benefits than required by  Plyler v Doe only exacerbates the problem as it serves to draw even more of them into the state. The  illegals desiring a higher education can go to the  National Autonomous University of  Mexico at  very little to no cost  and then work in Mexico  where they are citizens. The students of California’s middle class priced out of UC do not have a similar  opportunity.
    http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2010/03/31/a-closer-look-at-the-tuition-free-golden-past-of-the-university-of-california-and-whos-financially-hurting-today/
    The costs of educating citizens of another country should not be borne by California families who cannot even send their own children to the states Land Grant University.

    “Rather than representing a financial loss for the state, these students
    will have the opportunity to contribute to the economic and social
    vitality of California.”

    Since the university is not increasing enrollment to accommodate illegals, this is a specious argument. This is not a positive sum game. It is not even a zero sum game. It is a negative sum game. Each illegal is taking the place of a US citizen who would be able to actually work in the United States.

    “While it is impossible to determine exactly how many undocumented
    students who are eligible for need-based financial aid attend UC
    Berkeley, our best estimates indicate that we have approximately 60.”

    Once there is aid available , the number of illegals will expand geometrically.

    The fundamental issue is that California’s  Land Grant Public University should not only be a viable educational choice  for students from lower income and upper middle  and upper income families, with students from middle income families priced out. Until this issue is resolved there should be no aid  for students from families who are not even legal citizens.

    • Anonymous

      Well, that’s not really fair to try to pair up undocumented versus middle-class students. If people really cared about the middle class and rising tuition then they would have said supported democrats in the CA legislature when they tried to increase revenues again and again. The ones who have stood in the way of that, with the result being a ~60% increase in tuition over the last 3 years, have been the republican legislators in the CA legislature. 

      Honestly, I don’t understand how you can say that middle-income students are priced out when there are thousands of people paying for their education via a combination of work, loans, grants, scholarships, etc. It doesn’t make any sense to compare these students because of their legal status when the reason that they got in to their respective colleges is not their legal status but their academic promise.

      If undocumented students, who as of now can’t receive private bank loans, can’t receive state financial aid, can’t receive federal financial aid, can’t legally work, are only eligible for a couple dozen scholarships, and often come from very low-income families, can find a way to pay the price tag  then I’m pretty sure that a student from a family income of “$80,000 – $120,000″ can find a way to pay for college.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

        [Well, that's not really fair to try to pair up undocumented versus
        middle-class students. If people really cared about the middle class and
        rising tuition then they would have said supported democrats in the CA
        legislature when they tried to increase revenues again and again.]

        Once again, these are NOT “undocumented”. They are ILLEGALS. In addition, raising taxes not only fails to deal with the real problem (out-of-control spending due to a bloated governmental bureaucracy) but will not necessarily raise income either. Almost all politicians who raise taxes in the hopes of getting expanded revenue find out later that such revenue is much less than anticipated. They can’t seem to fathom the fact that capital is mobile, and people faced with a higher tax bracket will find ways to minimize their tax exposure. In the case of California (individuals AND businesses), one of the ways to deal with that is to relocate out of state. How are you going to get more state taxes out of those evil nasty rich when they simply choose to establish their “permanent” residence in Las Vegas or Phoenix? Clearly details that the tax-and-spend crowd fails to consider…

        • http://www.webhamster.com/ The Sharkey

          Agreed.

          “Undocumented” makes it sound like they just lost their papers when they were moving.

          It’s misleading, and downplays the fact that these are people who have come to the United States illegally and are violating Federal immigration law.

          • Anonymous

            My question is, under whose SSN are they documented? 

      • Anonymous

        “If undocumented students…can find a way to pay…”
        You are assuming that illegal aliens are all peasants who have no resources.  Some illegal aliens are from middle class families that vacation in the U.S. and simply decide to stay permanently, with the mother taking care of the kids and the father working outside the U.S.  Some illegal aliens are able to borrow money from extended family members.  Many illegal aliens have learned to join labor unions to get union wages and defraud the American welfare system, and of course those who work “under the table” don’t have to pay any income taxes.

        However, let’s assume some illegal alien U.C. students really did come from poor peasant families and never received a dime in welfare.  By that argument no citizen should ever get financial aid either, since even the poorest of the poor illegal aliens somehow managed to get into U.C. and pay for the full cost without grants or loans.
         

  • Guest

    “exploring ways in which these students, once they graduate, can find legal employment”
    This means amnesty.  The Chancellor should be urging these students to apply for citizenship through the legal channel.

    • guest

      If applying for legal status is that simple and was a valid option, Ab540 students would have already tried that.

      • Guest

        Nobody says it’s simple.  But it’s the only authorized channel to citizenship.  “Amnesty” is simply excusing crimes.

    • Anonymous

      It really is more complicated than simply just “getting in line”.

      • Anonymous

        It’s not complicated at all.  No cutting in line!

      • Guest

        So you refuse to file an application for citizenship?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

    I see the propaganda is being laid on thick by the usual enablers. Sorry, Dr. Birgenau, but if Cal has enough money to pay the education of people who aren’t in this country legally, then there’s no real fiscal crisis after all. Your ass needs to be fired.

    • Guest

      Your statement is a non sequitur.  Funding (or not) for resident aliens is not the basis of the fiscal crisis.  The shortfall in UC’s budget is massively greater than the amounts you refer to.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

    [The legislators responsible for AB 540 recognized that many undocumented
    students who are products of California’s education system were brought
    here as young children not knowing that they did not have proper legal
    status.]

    Their parents knew they were breaking the law. That’s what matters.

    • Anonymous

      But it has nothing to do with their actions… They just grew up doing what everyone of their peers was doing: succeeding in school and preparing to head to college. 

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

        Has to do with their parent’s actions. Their parents should be deported, and they should move with their parents. Once they are adults, they can come here and attend school, but NOT with the benefits that come with California residency.

      • Anonymous

        There are tens of millions of high school graduates in China, India, and the Middle East who would also like to come to an American university using American financial aid.  Should we just pay for all of them too?   

      • Anonymous

        College is free in Mexico to qualified Mexican citizens.  Same for most other countries.  And when they turn age 18 and become responsible for their illegal status, it has everything to do with their action, of intentionally breaking numerous US laws in order to take from the law abiding.

  • Guest

    “brought here as young children not knowing that they did not have proper legal status”
    If a child is illegally taken to a foreign country, he should be repatriated.

    • the cracker barrel

      That’s fucked up, yo.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

        What’s even MORE “f-cked up” is foreign nationals coming here illegally and thinking they have a right to education/welfare/healthcare/whatever at the taxpayer’s expense. However, what’s the most “f-cked up” of all are the mindless twits who have never held a real job, never paid taxes or held any real responsibility in their lives, who think it’s fine and dandy to give away other people’s money. You children, cloistered in your little academic world far from reality, are completely oblivious to the OUTRAGE building up in the average working person in this country. Some of you are going to be in for a real shock the day you receive your first paycheck from your first real job, see how much comes out of it in the way of taxes, and realize that you are going to have to start paying the bill for all these feel-good ideas that you have blandly accepted all these years…

        • Anonymous

          You know you’re not the only who has a job and pays taxes right? I work and am a full-time student. 

          But, look, I’m NOT bitter!! Isn’t that something? I actually care about other people and society.

          And after I graduate college, I can assure you that I won’t be bitterly criticizing the public programs and funds that created the institutions that helped me become an educated and hard-working individual. I feel that it is my duty to give back to a fund that I benefited from.

          If anyone is “cloistered in a little world”, it’s you man.

        • Anonymous

          You know you’re not the only who has a job and pays taxes right? I work and am a full-time student. 

          But, look, I’m NOT bitter!! Isn’t that something? I actually care about other people and society.

          And after I graduate college, I can assure you that I won’t be bitterly criticizing the public programs and funds that created the institutions that helped me become an educated and hard-working individual. I feel that it is my duty to give back to a fund that I benefited from.

          If anyone is “cloistered in a little world”, it’s you man.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

            [You know you're not the only who has a job and pays taxes right? I work and am a full-time student. 

            But, look, I'm NOT bitter!! Isn't that something? I actually care about other people and society.]

            How about if you start caring more about your FELLOW CITIZENS who also pay taxes than the illegal moochers who come here demanding handouts? You seem to ignore the fact that every dollar spent on illegals is one less dollar spent on a deserving US citizen. Come on now, we’re supposed to be in this huge budget crisis but we have money to give to people whose families didn’t even come here legally? What part of basic common sense do you not understand?

          • Anonymous

            You are welcome to care about other people and society using your own money.  Once you have kids feel free to spend your money on illegal aliens rather than saving it for your own kids.  But don’t use other people’s money to show your charity.  

          • http://www.webhamster.com/ The Sharkey

            “But, look, I’m NOT bitter!! Isn’t that something? I actually care about other people and society.”

            So feel free to spend your own money putting illegal aliens through college.

            But you shouldn’t be able to force the taxpayers to do it just because *you* think it’s a good idea.

  • BetweenTheCheeks

    cut from the top dammit, if you want to be equitable about anything. We are already getting less for our money, so as welcome “social change” may be, who the hell is paying for all these nice things?

    Why pit “illegals” against citizens for educational resources? Someone has to pay for the opportunities undocumented students will be receiving, and it certainly has not been the fat cats above. Birgeneau only cares about the image of the university, and uses “illegals” to propel his own agenda, leaving the ever-increasing bill to people who have no other choice to pay out.

  • Anonymous

    Is undocumented students the same as illegal alien students?   Is it legal for illegal aliens to be in this country?  If the answer is “YES”, why do they call them illegal aliens?  If the answer is “NO”, why teach them at taxpayers expense?  No illegal alien should be in this country.  We have to get rid of them!

    • Una Orgullosa Tejana

      The first illegal aliens in to this country were European folk. So, if one wants to talk about what is legal and what is illegal, we must analyze America’s history and how this history has been shaped by our European fathers. Thus, students are undocumented, not illegal.

      • Guest

        “The first illegal aliens in to this country were European”
        Under what system of laws were they declared illegal?  Who was the governing authority?  What laws were supplanted when the US Constitution was ratified?

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

          You’re trying to ask logical questions out of someone who has clearly been indoctrinated into the La Raza party line. Don’t expect a logical response.

      • Anonymous

        One must also realize that the Native American Indians did not build the U.C. system and are not offering financial aid, so it’s irrelevant if U.S. citizens of European descent are still illegal aliens or not.  Under our current system of immigration law an undocumented person is an illegal alien.

      • Anonymous

        Actually, by your definition, the first “illegal aliens” were the Asians who moved here 12,000 years ago, and who displaced the Solutreans from Europe who moved here 20,000 years ago.  Get your history straight.

    • Anonymous

      DelawareBob comments on the Daily Cal? Something’s wrong with this picture…

      Well, Bob, these undocumented students have a right to financial aid programs administered by the state and the UC since 1) a portion of tuition that every student pays goes into a pool of financial aid that is distributed among students 2) every person (undocumented or not) who pays taxes should be able access to the benefits of a general fund that they pay into.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

        People in the country illegally are not entitled to a free education.

      • Anonymous

         Illegal aliens who use fake Social Security cards to get jobs can’t help but pay income taxes.  They should not expect to get any of that money back since they earned it while committing fraud.  If you steal a TV do you still expect to get free warranty repair on it? 

  • Anonymous

    UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau displaces instate Californias qualified for UC Berkeley for $50, 600 Foreigners and The  UC Board of Regents Lansing, UC President Yudof, Governor  Brown agree. Instate Californians are second class applicants to Cal.

    Birgeneau displaces qualified for public university education at Cal Californians with $50,600 Foreign applicants.

    email opinions to uc board of regents   [email protected]

    • Anonymous

      I don’t know why any foreign parent would wait to send their child here at age 18 and pay $50,000 a year, when they could send them at age 15 and pay nothing for tuition.

  • Anonymous

    Birgeneau all but admits that he is seeking more than just financial aid for illegal aliens.  He is seeking amnesty!  He said “Supporters of AB 540 are exploring ways in which these students, once they graduate, can find legal employment.”  Only legal immigrants are allowed to work.  When the U.S. is filled with recent college graduates who can’t find jobs, why should we be so eager to turn illegal aliens into new college graduates so they can compete in the brutal job market with our unemployed friends and relatives?  We don’t need more unemployed college graduates in California’s current economy, and if trends hold, there won’t be a huge number of jobs waiting in the future unless one is an high tech engineer or medical specialist.

  • Anonymous

    Birgeneau says “President Obama…emphasized that California cannot afford to
    waste one single talented person and that as a nation, we must not
    neglect individuals who can become tremendous assets to the United
    States.”
    Um, did Obama forget that under his watch the unemployment rate jumped above 9%?  Where will all those DREAM Act illegals go to find jobs once they get their U.C. degrees?

    • Anonymous

      All the best new jobs are outside of the USA, that’s where.  Actually I don’t know why the Dreamers want US citizenship with the poor job prospects here.

  • Una Orgullosa Tejana

    The move by UC Berkeley is momentous, and one that must be closely analyzed, understood, and dissected. As a country, America initially allowed ‘admittance’ to other cultures through formal presidential agendas. These agendas were created and pushed forward to create a stable economic foundation for America. One of those agendas was slavery. With the growth our nation, education expanded beyond the typical WASP to the black community with the creation of HBCUs, and then recently HSIs.

    With an influx of immigrants in our nation, we began to establish barriers towards access, to anything. Whether it be because of war or poverty, individuals simply want better for their families. We have become ignorant of the fact that the economic state in which America finds itself in today, was and is caused by the barriers established. Before any anti-immigrantion reform, we were fine. America was fine. There were jobs. But the ‘typical’ American began to see these other cultures and communities as threats. Now, every person of color we see is a threat.

    We must remind ourselves of our history, and avoid all its tragedies from happening again.

    Side note: undocumented students are not only students of color, there are also white students who identity as Canadian, maybe even European. Stop profiling. We must begin with ourselves in order to progress to occur.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

      You’re uttering a bunch of half-truths and babble, par for the course for the pro-illegal crowd. For starters, the importation of slaves was outlawed by Congress in 1807, over 200 years ago. Secondly, there have always been “barriers to access”. They are called “immigration laws”.  Third point, you ignore the fact that the US legally admits more immigrants than any other nation in the world, and that the vast majority of those legal immigrants are from Mexico. Last but not least, in smearing others as “anti-immigrant”, you deliberately ignore the difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL immigration. You might be able to get away with such nonsense in an environment of intellectual conformity such as that found in present-day academia, but your arguments will never fly in the real world. Better find some source of info other than your La Raza Studies class, because you are clearly ignorant and uninformed on a number of points…

    • Anonymous

      “Before any anti-immigrantion reform, we were fine.  America was fine. There were jobs.”
      This Ethnic Studies student clearly needs to take some some classes in statistics or logic.  She needs to learn some American history as well.  This country has had many periods of anti-immigration sentiment and many cycles of job growth, and the two are not negatively correlated.  In any case anti-immigration reform certainly does not cause unemployment.  If anything, it should stimulate demand for unskilled American workers.  America still welcomes legal immigrants who can make our country more competitive, but illegal aliens should not get financial aid just so they can compete with citizens.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you, Chancellor Birgeneau, for being sensible and a leader in this human rights issue. It is great to know that there are people in the world who can look past the rampant prejudices that exist in society and advocate for policies that benefit society as a whole by making us a more educated and equitable society.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

      [Thank you, Chancellor Birgeneau, for being sensible and a leader in this human rights issue.]

      BS, it’s not a “human rights” issue. It’s a fiscal issue. US taxpayers are under no obligation to finance education, health care, or anything else for people who chose to break our laws and come here illegally.

  • Godknows

    It is really nice to be nice, but excuse me for asking, what about our children?
     Our families followed all the rules and regulations, worked hard, and waited our turn to become American citizens.    We taught our children to be honest and fair, and now they can’t even find a job after going into debt to pay for their education.   And, why does everyone act as if we have two-heads when we ask, when is it our turn? 
    ‘The next time you are at the post-office and you’ve taken a number and waited patiently for your turn; then someone walks in and goes right to the counter and demands service, then this really nice guy says, oh that’s all right those people in line won’t mind waiting”

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

    Meanwhile, the regents want to raise the tuition of students who are citizens and/or legal immigrants. There’s no free lunch, kiddies. You WILL pay for this outrageous pandering to illegal aliens, either out of increases to next years tuition, higher state taxes when you get out of school and start working, or both…

  • Guest

    No tax money for illegal immigrants.

    • Anonymous

      It is worse than no tax for illegals! UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau DISPLACES qualified for public university at Cal Californians with FOREIGNERS paying $50,600 tuitions.

      Birgeneau eliminates Californians from Cal!

      • Guest

        It’s not Birgeneau’s policy.  Every UC and CSU campus has had to reduce enrollments in response to the legislature’s budget cuts.  Non-resident tuition-paying students aren’t displacing Californians; they’re subsidizing them.

        • Anonymous

          Birgeneau does not have to follow the heard.  He is hurting qualified for Cal Californians whose parents have paid taxes for years to fund Cal.

          Californians are subsidizing the Foreign students. The $50,600 Foreign tuition does not include the amortization of the fixed assests of Cal that have been paid for by Californians for many years thru California taxes. Foreign students use the fixed assets -buildings etc.

          If the amortization of fixed assets were included the Foreign rate would double.

          Californians subsidize Foreign students so the foreign students can displace qualified Californians.

          Fire Chancellor Birgeneau, NOW

          • Guest

            “Birgeneau does not have to follow the heard.”
            That’s spelled HERD.
            How often do you have to be told that Birgeneau doesn’t set policy for UC?  The University’s level of State support is set by the legislature, and enrollment policy and tuition are set by the Regents.  Firing Birgeneau would change absolutely nothing.

          • Anonymous

            Firing Birgeneau will remove a spend thrift from Cal. and control costs that increase tuition.

            University of California Berkeley (Cal) picks the pockets of Californian students and their
            parents clean. (The author has 35 years’ consulting experience, has taught at Cal where he observed
            the culture, way senior management work and was not fired)

            University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau ($500,000 salary)
            has forgotten that he is a public servant, steward of the public money, not
            overseer of his own fiefdom.  Stunning
            misguided waste: Tuition fee increases exceed national average rate of
            increase; Recruits (using California tax $) out of state $50,600 students who
            displace qualified Californians from Cal; Spends $7,000,000 + for consultants
            to do his senior management work (prominent
            East Coast university accomplishing same 0 cost); Pays ex Michigan
            governor $300,000 for lectures; Procuring
            $3,000,000 consulting firm failed to receive proposals from others; Latino
            enrollment drops while out of state jumps 2010-11 (M Krupnick Contra Costa Times);
            Ranked # 70 USA best universities Forbes; Tuition to Return on Investment drops
            below top 10; QS academic ranking falls below top 10; Only 50 attend Birgeneau
            all employees meeting; Campus visits down 20%; Absence Cal. senior management control
            NCAA places basketball on probation.

            It’s all shameful. There is no justification for violations by a steward of the public trust. Absolutely none!  

            Governor Brown, UC Board of Regents Chair Lansing must vigorously enforce stringent oversight over Chancellor Birgeneau who uses Cal. as his fiefdom.

            Email opinions to uc board of regents   [email protected]

          • Guest

            “Firing Birgeneau will remove a spend thrift from Cal. and control costs that increase tuition.”
            Nonsense.  Tuition has spiked at every UC campus, and Birgeneau is irrelevant.  We’ve just been through an audit that showed UC’s expenditures are reasonable and correct.  Tuition increases are entirely attributable to the legislature’s drastic cuts in the budget for higher education.

          • Anonymous

            Examples of Birgeneau’s spend thrift habits that do not hold the line on rising costs,

            University of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau ($500,000 salary)
            has forgotten that he is a public servant, steward of the public money, not
            overseer of his own fiefdom.  Stunning
            misguided waste: Tuition fee increases exceed national average rate of increase;
            Recruits (using California tax $) out of state $50,600 students who displace
            qualified Californians from Cal; Spends $7,000,000 + for consultants to do his
            senior management work (prominent East
            Coast university accomplishing same 0 cost); Pays ex Michigan governor
            $300,000 for lectures; Procuring $3,000,000
            consulting firm failed to receive proposals from others; Latino
            enrollment drops while out of state jumps 2010-11 (M Krupnick Contra Costa
            Times); Ranked # 70 USA best universities Forbes; Tuition to Return on
            Investment drops below top 10; QS academic ranking falls below top 10; Only 50
            attend Birgeneau all employees meeting; Campus visits down 20%; Absence Cal. senior
            management control NCAA places basketball on probation.

            It’s all shameful. There is no justification for violations by
            a steward of the public trust. Absolutely none!
              

        • Anonymous

          Chancellor Birgeneau is a spend thrift. These are the kinds of savings that Cal would accrue when Birgeneau is honorably retired.

          Nobody’s perfect, but some
          higher education chancellors are much less perfect as stewards of public funds than
          others. University
          of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau
          ($500,000 salary) has forgotten he is a steward of public money, not overseer
          of his own fiefdom.

           

          UC Chancellor Birgeneau does
          not have a grip on financial realities. Trust the evidence.

           

          Tuition increases
          exceed national average rate of increase. 
                

          Recruits
          (using California
          tax $) out of state, foreign $50,600 students who displace qualified sons,
          daughters of Californians.

          Spends
          $7,000,000 + for consultants to do the work of his senior management.      

          (Prominent East Coast
          University accomplishing same 0 cost).

          University accrues $150 million of
          inefficiencies over his 8 year reign.

          Pays the
          ex Michigan governor $300,000 for lectures.

          In procuring $3,000,000 consultants failed
          to receive proposals from other firms.

          Latino
          enrollment drops out of state jump 2010(Krupnick Contra Costa Times).

          Best in nation rank: # 70 Forbes.

          Academic rank: QS academic falls below top ten.

          Tuition to Return on Investment drops below
          top10.

          Cal is most expensive USA
          public university.

          NCAA: absence
          senior management oversight, basketball program on probation.

           

          It’s
          all shameful: these illustrations are not isolated examples. There is no justification
          for such irregularities by a steward of the public trust. If UC chancellors
          don’t understand the importance of financial stewardship they have no business
          in a public office. 

           

          Chancellor Birgeneau’s self-indulgent
          practices continue. University of California Board of Regents Chair Sherry
          Lansing must vigorously enforce financial oversight of Birgeneau. Only then
          will confidence of Alumni, donors, legislators, Californians improve.

           

          (My
          agenda is transparency. I have 35 years’ consulting experience; have taught at
          UC Berkeley, where I observed the culture & the way senior management works.
          No, I was not fired or downsized & have not solicited contracts from UC/Cal).

           

          Yours is the opinion that
          can make the difference, email UC Board of Regents    [email protected]

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pamela-Kennedy/100001233602883 Pamela Kennedy

           UC Davis seems to have mostly foreigners paying full tuition without help from the state of California, also people from other states, again paying full tuition with little help from the state of California. But then, Davis is just a UC-college-town.

  • Anonymous

    Cal Chancellor Birgeneau displaces qualified for public university education at University of  California berkeley instate Californians for $50,600 FOREIGN applicants.

    Birgeneau denies Californians admission to UC berkeley!

    opinions to Regents   [email protected]

  • http://twitter.com/fallinsfree THAT’S LIFE

    have U ever noticed how disgustingly overpopulated just about EVERY!! us AMERICAN CAMPUS AND SURROUNDING IS!?? how on earth would any sane person want to legislate AN INCREASE!! OF STUDENT POPULATIONS, EVEN SUCH UNDOCUMENTED???! seriously, i am utterly convinced that the so called institutions of higher learning have not only failed, but are a detriment to society at large, as a whole. R u people really that dumb? what is the purpose all this lofty ‘über-academia’? so that more and more imbeciles can convince the stupid that they are a genius?  please stop acting like your super social vein is full of purpose and meaning. it’s sickening.

  • Anonymous

    “Supporters of AB 540 are exploring ways in which these students, once they graduate, can find legal employment…”
     
    And with that, Birgeneau glosses over the critical flaw: undocumented residents can’t be hired in California, whether they have college degrees or not.