What does the coalition stand for?

PEC

Correction Appended.

This summer, following the July Regents Meeting ­— at which student fees were raised by another 9.6 percent — a group of students, workers and faculty began meeting to renew our shared fight for public education and against the evisceration of the UCs. Since then, we’ve held large social gatherings and open meetings to begin building an effective, coordinated pushback against fee increases and worker layoffs.

These attacks against students and workers are only intensifying: This past week, we learned that the UC Regents are considering a plan that could result in an 81 percent fee increase over the next four years. They may be voting on this plan in mid-November.

In collaboration with our allies in the labor movement, we are building for mass student walkouts on Nov. 9 and 10, which we hope will make it more difficult for the UC Regents and state politicians to carry forward their agenda to privatize California’s public universities and to slash spending on health and social welfare programs.

In order to begin building for the November actions, we’re organizing a public forum on state austerity and budget cuts tonight, from 6 to 8 p.m. in 315 Wheeler. We’ve also called  for and are organizing a day of action this Thursday, Sept. 22, which will begin with a noon rally on Sproul Plaza.

We have collectively prepared the following statement in advance of Thursday’s Day of Action, and hope that all students, workers and instructors on campus will join us in fighting for public education and against the destruction of the public sphere in California:

We are a broad coalition of UC Berkeley students, workers, instructors and community members who are committed to fighting for universal, free and accessible education.

As members of the campus community, we see university administrators and state politicians abandoning and blocking the realization of this goal. We are facing crushing levels of student debt from massive and increasing student fees, the intensifying exclusion of students of color and working class students, worker layoffs, departmental cuts that have damaged the quality of our education and futures constrained by devastated job markets.

Meanwhile, corporations and the wealthiest individuals — including many UC Regents — continue to rake in increasing bonuses and profits, partly by speculating on our indebtedness. This destructive prioritization of corporate interests is apparent at all levels of society: in our country, state and education system.

We say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! We live in the richest society in the history of the world, and yet we always hear that there are no resources for accessible public education and decent public services. We, as a society, generate immense wealth. Trillions of dollars are currently directed towards warfare, incarceration and the enrichment of an already wealthy few. It is through collective actions that we must reclaim and redirect this wealth for the public good and the needs of the people. We support making corporations and the wealthy pay for free public education, health care and social services.

Popular movements against austerity and oppression all across the world have occupied public squares and established popular assemblies where ideas can be exchanged and proposals debated. From Spain to Chile, these movements have revealed how education and consciousness-raising are far more effective when combined with a strategy of impacted communities mobilizing in the streets.

As members of the UC community, we demand a complete reversal of recent fee increases; a revision of current admissions policies to lift barriers faced by underrepresented students of color and working class students; the re-hiring of workers fired as a result of budget cuts; a full investigation of the Regents’ conflicts of interest, especially their investments in banks and for-profit schools; an end to UC administrative and police surveillance, violence and intervention in political and academic activities; equal and full access to the university for undocumented students and workers; and the democratic control of the university by students, faculty and staff. In order to pursue these ends, we are committed to uniting with people and movements in all sectors of society who share our commitment to the empowerment of workers, students and the unemployed to create an equitable, compassionate society.

Amanda Armstrong is a graduate student at UC Berkeley and Ricardo Gomez is a senior at UC Berkeley.

Correction(s):
A previous version of this op-ed incorrectly stated that the UC Board of Regents would be voting on a plan to increase tuition this November. In fact, there is no guarantee that action will be taken on this plan.

This op-ed also incorrectly stated that a protest will take place next Thursday. In fact, that protest is taking place this Thursday, Sept. 22.

  • Anonymous

    Online courses offer students the chance to participate in classes on their own schedule. You may connect from your home or office, reducing the amount of time you spend traveling. read “High Speed Universities” article on how online is changing the way we study

    • Guest

      Pay the Daily Cal for advertising space, or get out of here.

  • student

    why

  • worked in politics

    I understand the severity of our problems and the movement of your cause, but what I don’t get is that while we revere in our political activism in the bubbles of this progressive city, that we don’t actively campaign at where the problem still persists adamantly- the halls of Sacramento’s state capitol. I worked there all summer long, promoting the awareness and the prompt conversations that can eventually enlighten politicians as to why the students are now struggling in an ever challenging system, enfeebled by fees and corrupted by high salaries- but my voice was almost alone. hell, I didn’t see any of you so-called activists visiting every darn office- from democratic to the tea party enthusiasts and asking members of our legislature to have a second turn at the horrid budget passed recently. What I saw were members of the community colleges and the cal-state students hustling everyday to get votes. I see what your coalition stands for but I don’t believe that clamoring further once more within the streets of this city will do anything but hamper the already expensive classes that your so called community members have to take. If I see one more bs alarm pulled for the recklessness of your cause, and no visible plan to take action for the politicians to understand, then as it stands, you are as blinded by your cause just as the regents are to the students.

    • amanda

      there are plans underway to put pressure on the legislature to refund public education and other social services, and to increase taxes on corporations and the wealthy to allow this to happen.  groups within our coalition are also involved in a ballot initiative effort for progressive taxation.  but lobbying alone won’t get us very far — you mention CSU and community college students in Sacramento, but those systems are facing equally severe cuts.  lobbying alone isn’t working.  what has worked though is protest.  in the fall of 2009, we had a mass walkout on Sept. 24th, and a series of subsequent actions, including building occupations, teach-outs, etc. (some alarms were even pulled), and this resulted in a partial restoration of state funding to the UCs.  the governor’s spokesperson said that protests at the UCs were responsible for their decision to (temporarily, it turns out) refund the UCs.  we see protest as a necessary, even central, part of any effort to reverse university privatization. 

      • Guest

        “the governor’s spokesperson”
        You’ve taken PR as fact.  The governor proposes; the legislature disposes.  Jerry Brown made a budget proposal for additional higher-education funding; the legislature rejected it.  Protests had no effect.

        • Hklhkh

          amanda is referring to the allocation in the 2010 budget, when schwarzenegger was governor.  and yes, it was real money. it was really allocated (and then squandered on raises for administrators)

          • Guest

            I think you may be referring to the cut of $300 million.  That was a one-time cut, automatically restored to UC’s base budget in the following year.  Student protests had nothing to do with it.  The restoration was assured before the protests occurred.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

        [there are plans underway to put pressure on the legislature to refund
        public education and other social services, and to increase taxes on
        corporations and the wealthy to allow this to happen.]

        Earth to Amanda: wealth is NOT taxed. What is taxed is INCOME. People can have high incomes without being wealthy, and there are plenty of wealthy people without high incomes (example: trust fund children). When you raise individual and corporate taxes, you target income earners, i.e. those people who typically own businesses and invest in the economy. California already has some of the highest income taxes in the nation, as well as a legal and regulatory climate that is not overly friendly to small business. Each tax increase is just an incentive for those productive people to pack up and leave the state. If you don’t believe me, why don’t you research the commercial property vacancy rate in the Bay Area and ask where all those former tenant companies went. Raising taxes will NOT solve the fiscal problem…

    • Hklhkh

      I guess you missed the part where we spent years and years going to Sacramento with nothing to show for it. . . Also, I’m not sure that *the summer* is the best time to be drawing conclusions about what activists are or are not doing.

  • Trouble

    It’s not only at the state capitol. The UCOP and the regents are responsible for the way money is allocated within the UC. And that money is mis-allocated. Raises and increased benefits for administrators, hiring more administrators than faculty, expensive construction projects for partnerships with private industry that don’t even involve education. Sacramento doesn’t force the regents to do that.

    • Guest

      “that money is mis-allocated”
      On the contrary, UC has tight controls on its funds.  Money provided for construction, for instance, must be used for that purpose.  Misappropriation of State funds is a serious offense that would incur penalties.

      The decisions you speak about may be questionable, but they aren’t significant in the full context.  The State has cut UC’s annual budget by a billion dollars, and the legislature is preparing yet more cuts.  There’s no way that layoffs and benefit cuts could ever approach those sums.

      • Burnucopburn

        Nice try, UCOP plant. It’s true that there are restrictions on State funds for construction. But UC hardly ever finances it construction that way anymore. It borrows from the open market, and pledges money from the general fund — that is, from student fees.

        • Guest

          Senator Yee’s audit refuted that assertion.

  • Anonymous

    University of California Regents Chairwoman Lansing coalition stands for displacing instate Californians for $50,600,

    University
    of California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau
    ($500,000 salary) displaces qualified for public university education at Cal.
    Californians with $50,600 FOREIGN students

     

    University
    of California Berkeley,
    ranked # 70 Forbes, is not increasing enrollment.  $50,600 FOREIGN students are accepted into Cal. at the expense of
    qualified instate students.

     

    Yours is the opinion that can make the difference: email UC
    Board of Regents   [email protected]

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

    [We say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! We live in the richest society in the history
    of the world, and yet we always hear that there are no resources for
    accessible public education and decent public services. We, as a
    society, generate immense wealth. Trillions of dollars are currently
    directed towards warfare, incarceration and the enrichment of an already
    wealthy few. It is through collective actions that we must reclaim and
    redirect this wealth for the public good and the needs of the people.]

    You fail to grasp the fact that the money supply is NOT infinite, nor do the people who are out in the real world working their asses off for years feel compelled to shovel more and more money into bottomless pit known as the California state budget. Many of you self-styled progressives fail to realize that all the various and sundry cash-intensive government programs and social services you advocate compete for the same taxpayer’s money. And no, raising taxes does NOT always increase revenue, as those same high revenue earners you target have the ability to either relocate out of state or change their fiscal habits to lower their tax liabilities. Really now, you need to get out in the real world and stop your incessant, self-centered whining…

  • Sherman

    “Trillions of dollars are currently directed towards warfare, incarceration and the enrichment of an already wealthy few”    Very true, but somehow I don’t think the UC Regents have the ability to end the wars we are fighting as a nation.      As always, complaining is easy — what specific plans do you suggest to resolve the situation?  How are you going to pay for everyone to have free education?

  • Guest

    “We, as a society, generate immense wealth. Trillions of dollars are
    currently directed towards warfare, incarceration and the enrichment of
    an already wealthy few.”
    In case you hadn’t heard, we expend more wealth than we generate.  Those trillions of dollars are mostly borrowed, and the prospect of repayment is low.  The likely outcome is rampant inflation and prolonged economic stagnation.