Bake sale shows poor judgment, timing

The Berkeley College Republicans have recently drawn the attention of local news media, having stirred controversy throughout campus for their decision to hold an “affirmative action bake sale” to coincide with SB 185, a bill that would allow the UCs and CSUs to utilize ethnicity in the applications process. The event, billed as satirical by its proponents, does not promote meaningful political dialogue or opposition to the bill; instead, it shows the poor judgment of the organization.

As the former president of the Berkeley College Republicans, I know what the campus political climate is at Berkeley. Conservatives are largely outnumbered in the famously liberal university campus. It is great that organizations such as The California Patriot and the Berkeley College Republicans exist, as they are able to provide a safe space for the discussion of new, open and, most importantly, contrasting opinions and ideas. Is that not the mission of higher education?

However, there exists a right and wrong way for exchanging and encouraging healthy political debate and dialogue. The bake sale is far from this, serving instead to instigate a reaction from those in favor of affirmative action. While clearly sarcastic and in jest, the description of the event is a blatant attempt to stir up dissent.

The bake sale occurs one year after campuses across the UC system saw ethnic tensions reach new heights. In San Diego, black students were the target of negative stereotypes and symbolism such as the noose and slurs. Similarly, at Davis and Berkeley, swastikas were drawn on Jewish students’ dorm rooms and campus buildings. In Los Angeles and Merced, online videos by students quickly went viral as their creators mocked Asian-Americans and Hispanic-Americans, respectively. While the event itself is not racist in and of itself, surely, whether you are in favor or against the policy of affirmative action, you can agree that the Berkeley College Republicans’ timing in this event was nothing but poor and shortsighted.

The fact of the matter is that the United States is a democracy. As Americans, we are blessed that we can freely exchange and engage in open dialogue and debate without any repercussions from our government or in our case as students, the university. The Berkeley College Republicans has the right to host this event. Opponents of the bake sale also have the right to protest and have an event to counter. However, what we cannot allow are attempts to impede the First Amendment rights of either side. Every one of us should meet calls for violence and attempts to intimidate either the Berkeley College Republicans or their opponents with strong condemnation.

While the Berkeley College Republicans has the right to host this event, they should not. This event will do nothing to progress genuine political dialogue over affirmative action and whether Berkeley or other UC and CSU campuses should employ it. Instead, those who care about the issue of affirmative action should utilize the political and democratic processes at our disposal. The bake sale is intended to coincide with the on-campus phone-banking efforts of those in favor of the policy. For those opposed to SB 185, why not lobby your representatives and politicians just as those in favor already seek to do? I assure you, it will make a larger political impact than simply creating controversy at Berkeley.

Rick Chen is a UC Berkeley senior and former president of the Berkeley College Republicans.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • California Defender

    “In San Diego, black students were the target of negative stereotypes and symbolism such as the noose and slurs.”

    ===

    Apparently you are misinformed Rick. Those events were planned and executed by BLACK students who fabricated a controversy for racist and selfish gain.

    Do your homework before posting such nonfactual nonsense.

  • John F. Hudson Class of 1972

    I wish to congratulate the Berkeley College Republicans for their successful bake sale. This is a small group who used the stupidity of their detractors to make a major splash on the national news. Yudof kicked it off by making an ass of himself with his hyperbole about “hate crimes”. Then the local radicals had a tantrum making this the most successful of the “affirmative” action bake sales in the nation. Without Yudof’s stupidity and the knee jerk reaction of the left wingers who had a hissy fit and demonstrated this would have been a non-event. 

  • Anonymous

    Chancellor Robert J Birgeneau ($500,000 salary) of University of California Berkeley displaces qualified
    for public university education at Cal. Californians for $50,600  payment by FOREIGN students.

     

    The University
    of California Berkeley,
    ranked # 70 Forbes, is not increasing enrollment.  $50,600 tuition FOREIGN students are accepted
    by Birgeneau at the expense of qualified instate students.

     

    UC Regent Chairwoman Lansing and President Yudof agree discriminating
    against instate Californians for admission to UC Berkeley. Birgeneau, Yudof, Lansing need to answer to
    Californians.

     

    Your opinion makes a difference; email UC Board of
    Regents   [email protected]

  • Francesca Parise

    This wasn’t a random event planned to offend people. It was timed specifically to present a new perspective, through satire, on current events. Current events that affect UC Berkeley.

    At best, members of our student government believed that the students they purport to represent share their monolithic views. BCR’s bake sale was timed perfectly both to publicly challenge that belief and to present the opposing view.

    So when, exactly, would have been an appropriate time to voice their dissent? When racism is no longer an issue?

  • Rick Chen, if you’re too much of a pussy to oppose the racism of the liberal establishment, shut up and don’t use your former position in BCR to undermine the cause of color-blind treatment of individuals. Of course, as others have suggested, this is probably more about some odd internecine struggle in BCR you came out on the wrong end of and are now venting.

  • Katelyn Sills

    Rick, let’s be truthful here. Your presidency was characterized by other members of the executive board doing all of your work. I support your right to free speech as an individual, but capitalizing on your former job title in such a manner is truly disgraceful. And let’s face it, without you being a “former president of Berkeley College Republicans”, this wouldn’t have been published.

    • other.pussy.board.memebers

      You got balls to post that non-anonymously. Props to you Kate.

      • Katelyn Sills

        Just thought I should mention, as a former executive board member myself, I’m very proud of the current leadership of the Berkeley College Republicans. They are doing things that I had hoped to do, but was never able to accomplish. No matter what our political persuasion is, we should be applauding the current leadership of BCR for their determination and personal strength. It’s incredibly hard to be a political activist and go to Cal at the same time. Try adding a difficult major and being in the conservative minority to that. These people are my heroes. :)

    • One little correction, Kate: Daily Cal has no publishing standards. Last year, they published some guy’s conspiracy theories that the Jews control the world.

  • Anonymous

    Rick said “The bake sale occurs one year after campuses across the UC system saw ethnic tensions reach new heights…the Berkeley College Republicans’ timing in this event was nothing but poor and shortsighted.” 
    Rick is implying that somehow the Republicans intended to time the bake sale with the anniversary of ethnic tension but that is not true at all.  The bake sale is timed to coincide with SB 185 phone event.  Furthermore, if conservatives must now be “sensitive” to the anniversary of ethnic tension, does that mean liberals own an ever-expanding list of liberal-only dates in which free speech is reserved only for liberals?  What if conservatives want to celebrate the U.S. military victory over Mexico in 1848 or the birthday of Ronald Reagan?  Will liberals and anarchists respect those “sacred” days in return?

  • Iaresorrys

    Looks like we have some coward who didn’t have the sack to come out and oppose affirmative action when in control of this organization.  Take a hike buddy, these people are actually standing up for what is right while all you did with your run was sit around doing nothing.

    • Iaresorrys

      Not to forget these people brought more attention to the travesty that is SB 185 than you would have clearly sitting on your hands waiting for people to take up the cause for you.  Thank god you’re no longer in charge over there.

  • Heath

    You people. Whenver hordes of liberals lie down in traffic or chain themselves to a business’ front door it’s called free speech. Whenever liberals scream down a conservative politician, throw pies at him, or dump beer on his head while he’s at dinner it’s called freedom of expression. It’s all always done for whatever the cause of the week is. If anyone opposes you, you attempt to silence them, label them nazis, racist or just crazy.  Yet somehow whenever conservatives give you the smallest dose of your own medicine you get so up in arms. Love to dish it but just can’t take it. Get over yourselves.

  • Jay

    We are in the greatest country in the world to speak freely. I don’t mind what the Berkeley College Republicans plan out, but they have the right to have such bake sale, as it is free speech. They are free to speak whatever they want, as long as no violence is involved. Free speech. Period.

  • [The fact of the matter is that the United States is a democracy.]

    Actually, it’s a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, where the majority has the right to elect representation but can NOT trample on the rights of the minority, whether that’s a racial, ethnic, or political minority such as the BCR. The fact that the majority can’t vote away the rights of an unpopular political group seems to be lost on ASUC and the self-styled “campus activists” who think they have some divine right to silence opinions they do not like…

  • Julian

    This former president needs to Man Up!

    • Jay

      what do you mean by the former BCR chair to man up?

  • bcr alum

    Methinks this has more to do with jealousy on the part of a former BCR president who didn’t do anything meaningful during his tenure.