UC Berkeley professor of English Lyn Hejinian was one of only two faculty members who spoke at Sept. 22’s Day of Action rally — and this came after a UC Davis professor was the only ladder-rank faculty member who spoke at a town hall meeting the Monday before.
“I’m sure I’m perceived as being on some lunatic fringe,” said Hejinian.
But just two years ago, Hejinian was among a large number of faculty members, including UC Berkeley professor of public policy Robert Reich and professor of city and regional planning Ananya Roy, who visibly advocated in similar settings and whose speeches at a teach-in in September 2009 drew resounding cheers from a packed Wheeler Auditorium.
Such faculty involvement “has, and will always be, an essential part of this movement,” said UC Berkeley student Marco Amaral, who has organized a number of protests.
But while the faculty’s goal of maintaining the university’s excellence has not changed, the path to achieving those goals has evolved, according to Robert Jacobsen, chair of the UC Berkeley Academic Senate.
Sept. 22’s protest and the teach-in held the Monday before did not draw faculty speakers in the same numbers as in 2009.
The Solidarity Alliance — a coalition of faculty, staff and students that played a leading role in the fall 2009 protests — which Hejinian chaired, no longer organizes rallies.
Associate professor of art history Gregory Levine suspects many faculty members feel a sense of “anxiety and powerlessness.”
“Untenured faculty members fear that their tenure wouldn’t be approved (if they protest),” said Hejinian. “Junior faculty have been warned to lie low.”
Campus spokesperson Janet Gilmore said that faculty have the freedom to express themselves without fear of repercussions.
“We absolutely respect the free speech rights of faculty, students, staff and others, with the expectation that they, of course, follow campus policies, state laws, and respect the rights of others to work, study, go to class, or go about their day,” she said in an email.
However, the challenge faced by a faculty member actually trying to speak to members of the UC Board of Regents — which has a more over-arching authority on budget issues than campus administrators — parallels those of a voter trying to speak to the U.S. president, according to Jacobsen.
In the face of such hurdles, individuals have tried to voice their grievances through larger organizations.
“Faculty have put huge amounts of energy into … many efforts that are not public — in particular, efforts to address issues through the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate,” Levine said in an email.
The campus division of the senate, composed of faculty members, speaks on behalf of the faculty to voice its concerns to the administration and through the administration to the board.
But the senate’s progress does not always keep pace with the rapidly changing funding situation for higher education.
“Because the faculty works in a deliberative way — a somewhat slow way, by some people’s standards — and because the budget came fast, there was some mismatch there,” Jacobsen said.
Levine said that the faculty’s advocacy movement still has traction and that its goals have remained the same since 2009.
However, Hejinian said she was not sure the movement would achieve its goals.
“I am not optimistic that these protests will stop what’s going on, certainly not in the near future,” she said.
Regardless of the prospect for failure, Jacobsen said the faculty will continue to advocate for the university so that it remains a premier institution, despite differences between individual faculty members.
“The faculty is a whole range — we don’t agree on anything except that we want this place to be great,” Jacobsen said. “We differ on tactics, on strategy, even sometimes on what great means, but we want this university to be great.”
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.
Public/ Private colleges: MIT, like MIT, UC should post All classes/materials online free to the world..
Tax-money on public land: UC should post all classes Free Free Free on web. All paid for with tax-money on public land…
Maybe it’s because professors don’t want to be seen as having anything to do with the crazies who occupy buildings and then whine when they get in trouble for it.
University
of California Berkeley:
the need for transparency has never been so clear. Chancellor Robert J Birgeneau
($500,000 salary) displaces qualified for public university education at Cal. instate
Californians for a $50,600 payment and a foreign passport.
UC Berkeley, ranked # 70 Forbes, is not increasing
enrollment. Birgeneau accepts $50,600
FOREIGN students at the expense of qualified Californians.
UC Regent Chairwoman Lansing and President Yudof agree to discriminating
against instate Californians for foreigners. Birgeneau, Yudof, Lansing need to answer to Californians.
Your opinion makes a difference; email UC Board of
Regents [email protected]
It’s because of Yudof’s buy-off. Over the summer he granted a salary raise and some other goodies to keep the faculty quiet. Look it up.
The real issue is that they see themselves as separate and insulated. Their narcissism is merely one variation on numerous other forms of perceived “safe” me-based existences that are available to the sheeple in our society.
Bunk. Merit increases go only to some. The others would certainly not feel “bought off.” Equally likely is that faculty don’t want to be associated with student movements that are disorderly and unintelligent. Kids raised on video games and salacious TV don’t have intellectual credentials that impress faculty.
“Video games and salacious TV”? Wow. Okay. You should go down to Wall Street. I hear it’s pretty disorderly and unintelligent down there too. More power to them.
Only an fraction of faculty supports protest at all, ever. Most want to lobby in Sacramento, consequences to other social programs be damned. And they were never directly impacted by these tuition raises in the first place.
You can blame video games and salacious tv or you can actually read about how the Academic Senate explicitly approved UCOP’s privatization agenda–which was reported on in this newspaper recently: http://www.dailycal.org/2011/07/07/academic-council-approves-recommendation-to-utilize-more-lecturers/
I read the article, but I sure as hell didn’t see any approval of privatization. It said we had to practice damage-control to reduce the harm the legislature’s cuts are doing.
Kids in the 60s didn’t have “video games and salacious TV” but it didn’t stop them from acting like psychopaths on the streets of Berkeley.
I love the University
of California (UC) having been a student and lecturer. But today I am concerned
that at times I do not recognize the UC I love. Like so many I am deeply
disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing, President
Yudof and the ten campus Chancellors from holding the line on rising costs.
Californians are
reeling from19% unemployment (includes those forced to work part time, and
those no longer searching), mortgage defaults, loss of unemployment benefits.
And those who still have jobs are working longer for less. Faculty wages must reflect California’s ability to pay, not what others
are paid.
Pay increases for
generously paid Faculty is arrogance.
UC Berkeley (ranked #
70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increases. Chancellor
Birgeneau has molded Cal.
into the most expensive American public university.
President Yudof and Chancellor
Birgeneau have dismissed many much needed cost-cutting options. They did not
consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring
faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, cutting
and freezing pay and benefits for all chancellors and reforming the pension
system.
They said faculty such
reforms “would not be healthy for University
of California”.
We agree it is far
from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university
system and the state to hold the line on cost increases. UC cannot expect to do
business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises and huge bonuses during
a weak economy that has sapped state revenues and individual Californians’
income.
There is no
question the necessary realignments with economic reality are painful. Regent Chairwoman Lansing can bridge the public trust
gap with reassurances that salaries and costs reflect California’s economic reality. The sky above UC will not fall
Opinions? Email the UC Board
of Regents [email protected]