UC Berkeley will be allocating at least $8 million as part of a systemwide salary merit increase program.
The merit raises will be given to staff and faculty who receive satisfactory performance reviews and staff whose salaries are currently under $200,000. The systemwide program will cost the university $140 million in total, according to UC spokesperson Steve Montiel.
The increases will apply to approximately 4,000 non-represented staff who are eligible for the program and will cost approximately $8 million, according to the campus administration. The top 20 percent of staff who scored the highest on their performance reviews are eligible for a 3 to 6 percent salary increase. The remainder of eligible staff will receive a 3 percent increase.
The campus administration was not able to estimate how many non-represented faculty are eligible because the review process for faculty has not yet been completed. Eligible faculty will receive a 3 percent increase.
The average non-represented, ladder-rank faculty member’s salary was $135,000 for 2010-11, while the average staff salary was $60,000, according to the campus.
More than 80 percent of staff who received a satisfactory review earn between $50,000 and $120,000 per year, meaning that the salary bonus would be an additional $1,500 to $3,600 annually.
The increase for non-academic staff is retroactively effective to July 1, while that of faculty is effective as of Oct. 1, according to the campus.
The increase is effective at all 10 UC campuses. UC spokesperson Dianne Klein called the increase “a merit raise, not a bonus.”
The merit increases are part of the UC’s effort to recruit and retain high quality professionals — an effort that has been severely weakened by California’s budget crisis.
Wendy Brown, campus professor of political science, said the climate among faculty and staff has “demoralized” due to dwindling funding from the state. Brown said the salary increase is meant to address this climate.
“Will it do that? Probably not,” Brown said, but added that the bonus salary would nevertheless be appreciated. “Most UC faculty and staff salaries have not kept pace with inflation, let alone salaries at our peer institutions.”
Correction(s):
A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that faculty and staff would be ineligible for merit increases if their salary was over $200,000. In fact, only staff are ineligible if their salary is over $200,000.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.
This from the same UC system that is supposedly broke.
think about this the next time your tuition is increased.
I love the University
of California (UC) having been a student and lecturer. But today I am concerned
that at times I do not recognize the UC I love. Like so many I am deeply
disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing, President
Yudof and the ten campus Chancellors from holding the line on rising costs.
Californians are
reeling from19% unemployment (includes those forced to work part time, and
those no longer searching), mortgage defaults, loss of unemployment benefits.
And those who still have jobs are working longer for less. Faculty wages must reflect California’s ability to pay, not what others
are paid.
Pay increases for
generously paid Faculty is arrogance.
UC Berkeley (ranked #
70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increases. Chancellor
Birgeneau has molded Cal.
into the most expensive American public university.
President Yudof and Chancellor
Birgeneau have dismissed many much needed cost-cutting options. They did not
consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring
faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, cutting
and freezing pay and benefits for all chancellors and reforming the pension
system.
They said faculty such
reforms “would not be healthy for University
of California”.
We agree it is far
from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university
system and the state to hold the line on cost increases. UC cannot expect to do
business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises and huge bonuses during
a weak economy that has sapped state revenues and individual Californians’
income.
There is no
question the necessary realignments with economic reality are painful. Regent Chairwoman Lansing can bridge the public trust
gap with reassurances that salaries and costs reflect California’s economic reality. The sky above UC will not fall
Opinions? Email the UC Board
of Regents [email protected]
Excellent…after the Occupy Wall Street event is over, denouncing Wall Street pay raises and excesses…maybe they can move back over to the Cal Campus?
there are now more administrators in the UC system than faculty,
please do try to defend the indefensible,
Numbers please? Many staff members work for self-supporting units (Housing, Parking, ASUC, Hospitals, Recreation, and are not paid from the same sources as faculty. What are you trying to prove?
How come it costs 50% more (after adjusting for inflation)
for University of California Board of Regents Chair Lansing and President Yudof
to provide the same service?
Total expenditures in the UC system in 1999-2000 were $3.2
billion to educate a student population of 154,000. Converted into 2011 dollars
using the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI calculator gets us to $4.3B in 2011
dollars, which comes out to $27,850 per student.
In 2011, the total UC system budget was $6.3 billion
dollars: an increase of almost 50% after adjusting for inflation. Enrollment
also rose – to 158,000 students, a 3% increase, yielding a cost per student of
$39,750.
Costs went up 50% in
10 years. And yet the news out of UC
President Yudof is that the UC system is “bracing” for ‘another round
of budget cuts’!
Email opinions to UC Board of Regents [email protected]
More fee hikes coming for the Cal kiddies. If you want to be the best, you have to pay for the best.
I love the University
of California (UC) having been a student and lecturer. But today I am concerned
that at times I do not recognize the UC I love. Like so many I am deeply
disappointed by the pervasive failures of Regent Chairwoman Lansing, President
Yudof and the ten campus Chancellors from holding the line on rising costs.
Californians are
reeling from19% unemployment (includes those forced to work part time, and
those no longer searching), mortgage defaults, loss of unemployment benefits.
And those who still have jobs are working longer for less. Faculty wages must reflect California’s ability to pay, not what others
are paid.
Pay increases for
generously paid Faculty is arrogance.
UC Berkeley (ranked #
70 Forbes) tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increases. Chancellor
Birgeneau has molded Cal.
into the most expensive American public university.
President Yudof and Chancellor
Birgeneau have dismissed many much needed cost-cutting options. They did not
consider freezing vacant faculty positions, increasing class size, requiring
faculty to teach more classes, doubling the time between sabbaticals, cutting
and freezing pay and benefits for all chancellors and reforming the pension
system.
They said faculty such
reforms “would not be healthy for University
of California”.
We agree it is far
from the ideal situation, but it is in the best interests of the university
system and the state to hold the line on cost increases. UC cannot expect to do
business as usual: raising tuition; granting pay raises and huge bonuses during
a weak economy that has sapped state revenues and individual Californians’
income.
There is no
question the necessary realignments with economic reality are painful. Regent Chairwoman Lansing can bridge the public trust
gap with reassurances that salaries and costs reflect California’s economic reality. The sky above UC will not fall
Opinions? Email the UC Board
of Regents [email protected]
$120 million for the UC system for raises?? Who pays for this? Student tuition of course. Nice. The average non-faculty staff member gets paid nearly DOUBLE the national average salary .. and UC is giving $120M raises at them at a time when many of the students’ families are struggling just to keep their kids in college?
Such arrogance.
“The average non-faculty staff member gets paid nearly DOUBLE the national average salary”
Really? Because most the staff I know are hardly able to survive on their UC salaries. Check your stats before you make them up.
“Who pays for this?”
The article already spelled that out:
About 40 percent of the money will come from state general funds and
other core funds, such as student fee revenue, according to Montiel.
Approximately 60 percent will come from other funds, including medical
center revenues and contract and grant funds, according to Montiel.
So the answer is, a portion of 40 percent. And what’s your objection? The meaning of “tuition fee” is payment to the people who educate. Why shouldn’t student tuition be used?
What part of THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS BROKE do you NOT understand?
This is great news. However, the UC Berkeley central administration still has not officially informed the staff and faculty with the details that is provided in the news article. I heard that other UC campuses addressed the details of the merit raise with their faculty and staff weeks ago.