An armed robbery occurred Monday night in Oxford Lane — at the southwest corner of Eucalyptus Grove — involving three men and three female juveniles, according to a UCPD crime alert.
One of the suspects and the victims — three female juveniles unaffiliated with UC Berkeley — made contact initially in the Oxford Lane alleyway where the suspect, riding a bicycle, approached them for a conversation.
That same suspect then left only to return 10 minutes later, at around 8:15 p.m., in a black SUV with two other suspects. The encounter began to turn physical when the male suspects began “grabbing the victims inappropriately,” according to the crime alert.
The three victims attempted to escape but were stopped when the first suspect revealed a handgun and aimed it at the victims. The first suspect then grabbed a bracelet from one of the victim’s arms and attempted to take her phone. A struggle between the two ensued, with the three suspects eventually fleeing the scene in their SUV, going southbound on Oxford Street. None of the victims were injured.
According to Berkeley police Sgt. Mary Kusmiss, spokesperson for the Berkeley Police Department, one of the victims then alerted the department with a 911 call from her cellphone at around 8:19 p.m. She said BPD arrived on the scene promptly at around 8:20 p.m.
A total of five Berkeley police officers and two sergeants were on the scene to take statements and “conducted area checks for the suspects.” Neither the suspects nor their vehicle were found.
The three suspects are still outstanding, according to Kusmiss.
The first suspect was described as a Hispanic male, between 17 and 18 years old, with an average height and build, wearing a gray beanie and black hooded sweatshirt and armed with a handgun.
The second suspect was described as a white or Hispanic male, 18 to 20 years old, with an average height and build, wearing a dark beanie, a white t-shirt and baggy jeans. The third suspect was described in the crime alert as a Hispanic male.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

so I am to attend Berkeley this spring and I am an international student, do you have any advises for me… I am gonna live in Stern, the northern dorms… are they safe? what precautions I should take? what is the average,expected percentage to be robbed?
interesting that the Daily Cal is willing to identify the race of Hispanic criminals, but noy black criminals
I commend the Daily Cal for revising their arbitrary policy of not identifying suspects by race.
Bunch of nerds posting….
kids – don’t walk that dark pathway at night. It’s been a mugger’s paradise for years.http://www.dailycal.org/2011/08/24/ucpd-responds-to-three-sexual-battery-incidents/
If you do, bring along your equalizer.
Some of the young’uns might not be familar with the term “đi đi mau” – LOL!
Pedants! (rolls eyes)
Three women are held up and we argue grammar and punctuation! (I’ll admit, I just spent 15 minutes Googling use of ‘were’ vs. ‘was’ with ‘none’.)
This is what psudo intellectuals do. Argue about dick.
This incident is another example of why we need a concealed carry policy.
This must be a rehash of an old Monty Python skit…
User123445:
The period is placed before the quotation marks, not after. (rolls eyes)
Wrong. There are two rules for that, British/Canadian and American and both are acceptable, but hey, you knew that, right? (rolls eyes again)
Jessie K
The paper is correct and you’re the one that is sad. Victims is plural so therefore “were” applies, not “was”. Go back to school. (rolls eyes)
“None” = “No one” (singular), so “No one of the victims were injured”? I don’t think so. I vote with Jessie K.
Fail. Go back to school.
None = no one, not one, and not any. A cursory google search revealed this. Maybe you should double check yourself before critiquing the works of others. This is the information age, you know.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=none
I’ll just leave this here…
As a former copy/night editor this conversation amuses me greatly.
“None of the victims were injured.”
None WAS; and this is a college paper? Sad indeed.
Rule: With words that indicate portions—some, all, none, percent, fraction, part, majority, remainder, and so forth —look at the noun in your of
phrase (object of the preposition) to determine whether to use a
singular or plural verb. If the object of the preposition is singular,
use a singular verb. If the object of the preposition is plural, use a
plural verb.
Congrats.
Sure, like this: “One of the victims were injured.” Makes perfect sense, no? No.
“No one” and “none” are not the same term. Fail.
Jessie K You WAS taught by the same English teacher as me LOL