The University of California could soon face an additional $100 million in preapproved, midyear trigger cuts — on top of $650 million already cut from the system this year — if state revenues fall significantly behind projected numbers.
The Legislative Analyst’s Office and the state Department of Finance will release revenue forecasts for the state — by mid-November and December, respectively — which will determine if cuts will be enacted in part, in whole or at all.
“The Legislature wanted to make sure that there was a built-in mechanism in place to keep the budget in balance, and that’s what you have with the preapproved trigger cuts,” said H.D. Palmer, spokesperson for the state Department of Finance.
In a time of drastically reduced funds, higher education may continue to be the most vulnerable institution due to policies and mechanisms in place that prioritize state funding for other public services.
According to Hans Johnson, senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, state legislation currently guarantees that a minimum portion of the state’s general fund will be allocated toward K-12 and community college education. Although California community colleges are covered, the University of California and California State University are not protected under the law.
Furthermore, Johnson said other public services, such as transportation and economic assistance for low-income families, are provided safety nets due to matched federal funding, court mandated funding and dedicated revenue streams.
“I think the reality is (higher education) is likely to remain more on its own,” Johnson said. “It’s just kind of depressing, but that’s the reality … Higher education is the area that seems the most expendable. I would say mostly the fault lies with our state policymakers, and the UC and CSU are given a hand that they have to deal with. They’re really responders to what the state does.”
Previously, Gov. Jerry Brown has assured UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau that the trigger cuts were likely to occur.
Chancellor for Administration and Finance John Wilton said in a Friday interview with The Daily Californian’s Senior Editorial Board that although the UC will not raise student tuition midyear, the institution may dip into its emergency reserves if the cuts are enacted.
However, Palmer and Paul Golaszewski, senior policy analyst for the Legislative Analyst’s Office, said that at this point, not enough information is known to predict whether the UC will actually lose the $100 million.
“I think that people are trying to extrapolate three months of revenue data and assume where things are going to go,” Palmer said. “But there are a lot more pieces of critical data that we are going to be getting in the next few weeks that will inform the Legislative Analyst’s forecast, as well as ours.”
Jessica Rossoni covers higher education.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.
UC needs to cut administrators. Increase retirement age for employees. Reduce pension benefits. California is out of money. It is overtaxed. Productive people are fleeing.
Just read the news about what’s happening in Europe and its effects on our stock market. Make a wild guess which direction California’s wealthy investors’ earnings are moving this year. Yup, UC will lose the $100 million for sure.
Newsflash! The state legislature has been cutting UC funding for decades. UC hasn’t been a priority for policymakers in years.
So go protest about the cuts in SACRAMENTO.
Protesting about them on campus is stupid, because the people who decide the funding don’t actually life or work there.
Cali Dept of Finance, Eh?
Nathan Brostrom, UC’s Executive Vice President for Business Operations, must know all about the goings on at that organization.
While working in the State Treasurer’s office Brostrom saddled CA w/ the biggest muni-bond deal in the nation’s history ($11 Bn).
At UC, he orchestrated the debt financing of the stadium renovation, $320 Mn for a structure sitting on an active fault, one constantly subject to aseismic creep.
Where was VP Brostrom before UC? JP Morgan.
JPM’s tentacles reach all things financial in this nation.
The Biggest Municipal Bankruptcy in the Nation’s History – Jefferson County, AL – they just filed. How did it happen? JP Morgan paid phat kickbacks to county officials to shit all over the public’s best interests. Buy up those toxic mortgage backed securities, friends, just like UC was doing in 2007 even as the marked collapsed! JPM already had to
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/11/10/bloomberg_articlesLUFH8207SXKX.DTL
So why does a guy so steeped in Wall St. toxicity still work at UC?
One might ask exactly the same thing about the other JP Morgan executive schmuck working in the white house as Obama’s chief of staff.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/us/politics/william-m-daley-obama-aide-hands-over-operations.html