Tents set up on Sproul in response to Cornel West discussion

Occupy Cal demonstrators set up three tents on Upper Sproul Plaza Friday evening in an impromptu act to gather public attention as over 1,000 people lined up to hear American intellectual Cornel West speak in Pauley Ballroom.

Although the action of setting up the tents was not formally approved by the occupation’s general assembly, assembly members present did not object to it, according to Christopher Luk, an Oakland resident who set up a tent.

West spoke with Carl Dix, a founding member of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA , in a campus event titled “In the Age of Obama … Police Terror, Incarceration, No Jobs, Mis-education: What Future for our Youth?”

“We got a line, we got an audience,” Luk said.

Police officers forced a previous Occupy Cal encampment to clear from the plaza Nov. 17. Though Occupy Cal general assemblies have continued since then, tents have not been set up, aside from a brief establishment at a Nov. 21 sleep-out on the plaza.

Luk said he was not worried about potential police presence, but said it was probable that officers could arrive later in the evening.

“If the cops come to take (the tents) down that would be better, because then (the people) in line would see how they treat us,” Luk said. “If they roust, they roust.”

UC Berkeley senior Alex Kim — who took a vow of silence and briefly set up a tent for himself and his cat on Chancellor Robert Birgeneau’s lawn Nov. 24 — wrote in a note that police officers do not have an excuse to remove the protesters during the weekend, when classes do not occur.

The tents will continue on a day by day, individual basis, according to Luk.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Anon

    Wait, so people who AREN’T EVEN STUDENTS, people from Oakland with no UCB affiliation, are coming onto campus and setting up tents, making the campus look like a refugee camp? Get a life.

    • Anonymous

      Berkeley is the piss pot for the bay area.

  • What’s new

    A vow of silence does not mean you don’t talk, Alex the idiot.  It means you don’t communicate at all.

    Geez, you are so stupid.

    • Stan De San Diego

      Alex is merely another left-wing attention whore.

  • Guest

    Correction: The line to see Dr. West numbered closer to 5,000.  Kudos to Dr. West and Cal students for coming out.

    • Anonymous

      Free event, right?

    • Another cal parent

      Proselytize for profit!  Capitalize on communism! Kudos to Dr West for turning a profit, Kudos to Carl Dix for earning ten grand on communism!  Kudos to Cal students for being so informed and provocative.  Grab your tent and unite!  

  • POLICE LIE CONSTANTLY

    Proving the Lie: Litigating Police Credibility
    David N. Dorfman
    http://digitalcommons.pace.edu

    Police officers can be expected to
    omit, redact, and even lie on their police reports, sworn or unsworn;
    they will conceal or misrepresent to cover up corruption and
    brutality; they are trained to deceive citizens during investigations as
    part of good police practice; they will obscure facts, and even lie, to
    cover up the misconduct of fellow officers.” Additionally, command
    practice and policy gives officers every incentive to lie to cover for
    lack of productivity or to aggrandize themselves for recognition and
    promotion. And yes, police officers will commit perjury in our courts of
    law.

    However, lies under oath, while often involving the
    tailoring of testimony to meet constitutional requirements, run a much
    wider gamut. For instance, perjury will occur to avoid criminal
    conviction or civil liability when the police officer is the accused.
    Police will commit perjury to further the prosecution of a citizen by
    adding inculpatory “evidence” to better secure a conviction,” to gild
    the lily of police conduct, or merely to sanitize the record of
    uncomfortable facts.  Put most broadly, as long as a police officer’s
    use of power and fulfillment of responsibilities is reviewed (whether by
    courts, government agencies or supervisors), and as long as such
    reviews are deemed by the officer as creating legal impediments to more
    immediate goals, he will have an incentive to lie.

    • Stan De San Diego

      Yawn. Take your silly propaganda elsewhere.