UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau hopes to call upon state governments and private donors to match federal funding to public research universities in a new proposal.
The proposal, which is still in its initial planning stages, would redirect $1 billion in federal funds over the course of 10 years to support public universities and was announced at the campus Graduate Assembly meeting Thursday.
Birgeneau has already started communicating with state legislators for preliminary support for the proposal, according to campus spokesperson Janet Gilmore.
The proposal calls on states and private donors to match federal higher education funding for public research universities, which currently totals about $30 billion annually, according to a UC Berkeley News Center article.
“It is an incentive for states to get funding and to give them an incentive not to cut,” Gilmore said.
Under the plan, the federal government would allocate up to an additional $130 million a year to California, up to $30 million of which would go to UC Berkeley, according to the News Center.
However, federal funding is already a primary source of campus revenue, second only to student fees, said Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Harry Le Grande. The university receives federal funding largely through grants, which total about $6 billion, according to UC spokesperson Steve Montiel.
Birgeneau stated at an August press conference that because of the decrease in state higher education funding, the federal government should increase funding to the country’s public research universities.
“The United States is now the only Western country where the federal government does not invest directly in its flagship public universities,” he said at the press conference. “Our great public universities … are a national resource, and … their support cannot be left to the states alone.”
However, campus Graduate Assembly President Bahar Navab said Birgeneau’s proposed plan fails to address the problem of why the state has limited funding for public education.
“It is a two-part issue,” Navab said. “There is the decreased funding for public education, but there is also a limited amount of revenue the state has, and until there is more money going into education, it will always be education versus something else.
Amruta Trivedi is the lead academics and administration reporter.
Correction(s):
A previous version of this article incorrectly cited campus spokesperson Janet Gilmore as the source in its claims that the federal government spends about $30 billion annually on funding higher education and that the plan would allocate up to an additional $130 million a year to California, up to $30 million of which would go to UC Berkeley. In fact, the information was actually from the UC Berkeley News Center.
The article also incorrectly stated that UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau has plans of making an official proposal of this new funding plan in Washington DC. In fact, while Birgeneau has plans of going to DC, there are no plans as of yet to present this proposal in front of Congress.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Birgeneau can’t accomplish this all by himself and isn’t time to stop acting like children and help this man and yourselves. News flash no one can help you but you, that’s how it works. Don’t be sitting around waiting for your parents to bail you out, because they need help too. You are right about one thing, neither the federal or state government is listening to you because unless you’re a corporation or a bank, you don’t matter. So do something besides complain about Birgeneau, at least he is trying.
Birgeneau thinks Congress can mandate matching donations from private donors.
Birgeneau’s proposal is in ‘initial planning stages’ yet he’s already heading to DC.
And this is Chump Change, a drop in the bucket:
$1 billion/10 years = $100 million/year (and that’s nationwide).
Whereas there’s ALREADY $30 billion/year in federal higher ed grants.
Whereas UC’s CURRENT ANNUAL BUDGET is $22 Billion.
The CA State Auditor reported that UCOP spent $6.6 billion over 5 years and could provide a only two words to account for the money: miscellaneous services.
http://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2010-105.pdf
Conclusion: Birgeneau’s proposal is a distraction from real issues such as the UC’s longstanding inability to handle funds responsibly and with sufficient accountability to faculty/students/staff/taxpayers. Birgeneau is both disingenuous and incompetent.