UC Berkeley’s College of Engineering is striving to increase gender and ethnic diversity among its students following allegations of discrimination last semester, although efforts are progressing gradually.
The college garnered much attention last October when a California Watch article pointed out instances of sexism in the campus’s male-dominated engineering student population. In a December letter, college dean Shankar Sastry admitted that the representation of women and underrepresented minorities was “markedly low in comparison to the rest of the Berkeley campus and to our engineering peers” and planned to dedicate efforts toward increasing diversity.
According to a demographic summary of gender and racial distribution released this month, out of the 3,052 students enrolled in the college in 2010, only 20 percent were female. Additionally, underrepresented minority students made up only 7 percent of the college in 2010 — compared to a campuswide 16 percent — with American Indian and Pacific Islander students at less than 1 percent.
To help rectify the lack of diversity, the college has been focusing on K-12 students in the hopes of attracting a broader range of applicants, according to Karen Rhodes, executive director of marketing and communications for the college.
“We are constrained from using ethnic or gender quotas by law, but what we can do is look at the current numbers and improve them,” Rhodes said, adding that there is “strong potential” for increasing the college’s acceptance yield rate.
Rhodes said the college is also working on planning partnerships with student groups and inviting students from “low-performing schools” for overnight stays.
Additionally, Oscar Dubon, an associate professor of materials science and engineering, began a new appointment Jan. 1 as associate dean of equity and inclusion for the college. Dubon is charged with overseeing and coordinating departmental efforts to recruit and retain underrepresented students and faculty, among other duties, according to the December letter.
Perhaps because the efforts are concentrated more on recruiting future students than on the existing student body, however, tangible results of the college’s efforts to increase diversity have been largely unobserved by current engineering students.
Ryan Shelby, a graduate student in mechanical engineering who spearheaded diversity efforts on behalf of student organizations representing minorities, said the college has been trying to address the issue of diversity since 2009 but with a stagnant task force and “unfulfilled objectives.”
He said Dubon, with whom he has met, is “passionate about fixing the problem” but has no budget at the moment.
Shelby said the college should begin setting hard numbers for percentage increases of underrepresented students.
“They’ve made a lot of cosmetic changes, setting up committees — I want to see change actually happen,” Shelby said. “I hope it does happen.”
The lack of diversity is not quite as pressing an issue to all, however. Claire Thompson, a freshman studying electrical engineering and computer science — the major with the smallest percentage of female students, according to the demographic summary — said she has grown somewhat used to the gender disparity in her classes.
“When you first walk into the room and see you’re one of the only girls, you think it’s kind of weird,” Thompson said. “But after a while, you get used to it.”
Amy Wang covers academics and administration.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

waste of money
admit the most qualified students, regardless of their race or gender
What do you think the ratio would be like in nursing school or secretarial school? Engineering appeals to a male brain type. No amount of social engineering will change that.
Would you want your computer protected from hackers by an affirmative action recipient? Would you want to drive on a bridge designed by an affirmative action recipient?
Also, whenever somebody calls asking me to donate to Cal, I tell them that I will as soon as they stop wasting money on paying deans of diversity. Clearly, as the situation stands, they have enough money, so they don’t need mine.
Unless there is reason to believe that the admissions process is biased, I see no reason whatsoever to academically compromise the standards of admissions for racial or gender-based equality. That’s affirmative action, even if you’re not setting quotas, and the people of this state have already voted it off the table. I’m not one of those people who says that racism and/or sexual inequality are gone, but I don’t see how making racist and sexist decisions in college acceptance policies fixes the problem. Yes, you’ll have “better” demographics in your College of Engineering. You’ll also have relaxed standards for our student body, thus lowering the quality of the education you’re giving, to say nothing of your students’ post- graduation potential. All in the name of equality.
It depends on what you’re trying to do in running the College of Engineering. If you see it as a social tool, useful for helping certain demographics get BS degrees, then you should be worried about demographics. If you’re more concerned with teaching engineering, and fostering better academic student rapport, you should accept only the most qualified applicants.
Unfortunately, most of the powers that be in the UC system have caved to pressure from the far left, and are willing to sacrifice academic performance for their own social agenda.
“When you first walk into the room and see you’re one of the only girls, you think it’s kind of weird”
The solution is not to re-engineer (pardon the pun) the student body in EECS to make women and non-Asian minorities feel accepted, but to make the course so interesting, challenging, and fun such that students don’t have time to look around and wonder whether their classmates are female, Punjabi, or future Knicks point guards.
Diversity = Mediocrity