Blame for homicide passed between police, protesters

Related Media

Related Posts

Correction Appended.

The Berkeley Police Department has come under fire this week for not responding to a call that evolved into the killing of a man Saturday.

Blame for the alleged murder of Peter Cukor, 67 — who was beaten to death outside of his Berkeley Hills home Saturday evening — has been passed between the police department and Occupy protesters who marched from Oakland to the UC Berkeley campus that evening.

Berkeley police have acknowledged that they were keeping officers on standby to monitor the march to the campus’s International House when Cukor first called at 8:45 p.m. to report a suspicious person “hanging around” his property.

However, at that time, the police department was only responding to criminal, emergency, in progress calls, according to Berkeley Police Department Lt. Andrew Greenwood.

After phoning police, Cukor walked to a nearby fire station for help and, on his way back, was bludgeoned to death, according to Greenwood. Police were on the scene in minutes, after Cukor’s wife, Andrea, called the department to report her husband was being assaulted.

Cukor was pronounced dead at the hospital, and a man identified as Daniel DeWitt is now being held on suspicion of the murder.

The alleged murder has shaken the community, including Berkeley City Councilmember Susan Wengraf — whose district encompasses the crime scene and knew Cukor personally — who has emphasized the “need to get at the root of this terrible tragedy.”

“Everyone is very shaken, and they are feeling vulnerable,” Wengraf said.  “I would like to get some assurance that the residents can depend on the police department 24/7, regardless of what else is going on in the world at the time.”

Although the police department has faced criticism for its delayed initial response, Greenwood said the first call from Cukor did not indicate the situation was an emergency. At the time, officers were only responding to emergency calls because they were preparing for the Occupy march that was planned for that evening, according to Greenwood.

“I’m totally freaked out by what happened,” said Cathy Romanski, a staff member at the UC Berkeley School of Law and a resident of the Grizzly Peak area where the murder occurred. “The police didn’t come when we needed them because of Occupy Oakland,” Romanski said. “I want them to know what they did — that a person died because of their protests. It’s appalling.”

However, Wendy Kenin, an Occupy Oakland protester, said the Occupy Oakland march did not leave until after the assault had already been reported, so blaming the department’s lack of response on the protesters is unfair.

“They are over-responding, and they are putting all their manpower into a peaceful demonstration when they should be responding to calls about potential violence,” Kenin said.

The second call from Cukor’s wife came in around 9 p.m., and the protesters left Oakland around 9:15 p.m., according to Noah Zimmerman, an Occupy Oakland protester.

Wengraf has called for police to provide information about how calls for help are handled, and to provide a timeline of what occurred after the call was made.

After the first call on Saturday evening, an officer who saw the queue of non-emergency calls offered to respond, but was told not to, according to Greenwood.

“It is a tragedy that the first call came on a non-emergency line, which is why it was not treated as an emergency and the dispatcher did not perceive the urgency of the situation,” Wengraf said.

In a statement released Tuesday, Berkeley Police Deptartment Chief Michael Meehan said the department is reviewing the circumstances of the case to “ensure everything possible was done to properly respond to this tragic event.”

“Occupy Oakland and Occupy Cal are being treated as convenient scapegoats for BPD’s poor, regrettable decision that indirectly resulted in a death of an innocent person,” Zimmerman said.

Correction(s):
A previous version of this article referred to the death of Peter Cukor as a murder. In fact, it is an alleged murder.

  • Tenedor

    How about car drivers bringing suits against bicyclists who dont follow the traffic rules: riding their bikes while using a PEDESTRIAN crosswalk, not making stops at lights or signs, not to mention riding on sidewalks, putting pedestrians in danger, swerving in and out of traffic, puuting themselves and others in danger???????? When are cyclists going to understand they are moving vehicles with all the responsability of following traffic laws. IS TIME TO EDUCATE BICYLISTS AS WELL!!!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/4V3A62P3OKTQP43EH7373OSEWU Peter

    Censorship on my comments would only make people more curious of what’s going on, and people would  believe in what I said more.
    ————————————————————————
    Truly admire the name of Berkeley. No intention of offending people of Berkeley, but what I am going to tell is tough to hear but real happenings. We need attention from the whole society to concur such anti-humanity crimes:
    ===================================
    Eric, we know your name has a huge impact on human society, but how could you stand for your fame
    without completely clarifiying those accusations listed here? Can you deny any one of them?
    ————————————————————-
    Eric Schmidt had threatened my life with the death of Stanford student May Zhou during his fight with
    Stanford. Eric Schmidt is part of this plot in May Zhou’s death. He had also conspired my life at a
    later time, and which had cost his Google CEO position.

    It started from a 2004 Stanford campus assault case, in which a lady named Gabriele Scheler bitterly assaulted me; Police concluded that I am a victim while Scheler is a criminal suspect after serious investigation; However Sebastian Thrun later joined Scheler to false accuse me at Stanford, and Eric Schmidt had joined them to support Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler against ruling from Stanford and police. During their tough fight with Stanford in the early 2007, Eric Schmidt and Sebasitan Thrun’s side had murderred May Zhou to threaten me, by telling me: “You see May Zhou, she’s an Asian (me too an Asian), … Police might not even find out who did it, what if it happened to you?” , and to terrorize Stanford (because May Zhou is Stanford student), and they did plot a murder on me as well last year when they found I would not compromise but insist on clarifying their crimes

    These accusations had been confirmed by authorities investigation and stand still which Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun dare not deny to the public so far. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun had not paid for their crimes

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/4V3A62P3OKTQP43EH7373OSEWU Peter

      We know such anti-humanity crimes would not be tolerated anywhere on this planet, and need attention from the whole society to concur such anti-humanity crimes, and I bet people of Cal would not advertize a fascism criminal who had endangered human lives either

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/4V3A62P3OKTQP43EH7373OSEWU Peter

        Just now, a man named “Everyman413″ said:
        “Have you not been taking your meds Peter?    Your incoherent, paranoid and libelous ramblings would be funny except that it seems you really do believe in the boogie man.  Nurse Ratched has been notified and wants you to return back to the institution immediately.”
        ==============My Answer===================== 
        Freedom of speech and equal opportunity, as long as I am sticking to the facts. Facts Eric Schmidt dare not deny while publicly losing face. No University would like to advertise a fascism criminal who had endangered human lives. Anyone who read his story had the right to know the crimes assiciated with him as well. Afraid of my speech to the public?  This ‘medical help’ cliche had been repeatedly used by Schmidt’s side for many years to save their face, but in the end, they dare not deny those facts displayed in my challenges. Can you have Eric Schmidt or Sebastian Thrun deny anything in it?

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/4V3A62P3OKTQP43EH7373OSEWU Peter

      Eric Schmidt on Sep 2, 4:02 AM said On BusinessInsider:  “Peter. It’s me, Eric. I thought we already talked about this. I am going to squash you like a bug if you keep posting on this comment board. What you don’t know (but surely suspected) is that the video cameras I installed in your house are allowing me to track everything you do. In fact, I am live streaming your pathetic life, including all the insane searches you do about my home address and love interests, to all my friends on the Stanford faculty. Next I will bring in my mafia-like dark killing power to bear. ”
      =========================== ===========================

      Eric Schmidt: Here is my reply to you in September, 2011; Remember, the more you seem busted, the more grounds you are losing. calm down

      ===========================
      Eric, be you real or not Schmidt, so finally, your psychological defense was broken, now that your mind became insane.

      Didn’t I defeat you globally wherever you go? You still don’t understand, that’s because your deeds, killing the innocent and threatening the victim, would not be tolerated anywhere on this planet. Anyone would be alerted of this case when you assisted a Stanford Computer Science faculty Sebastian Thrun to counter Stanford ruling against him and to threatening me from fighting against your crimes, by threatening me with the real murder case of Stanford student May Zhou; in fact, police investigation had confirmed it is people on you (Schmidt) and Thrun’s side who murdered May Zhou, before I would post the case on the web. Quite a scandal unheard of in history of college education.

      I clearly aware your side is closely watching me though I am a powerless victim on the other side of the earth, because you fear me of my speech to the public about your crimes, crimes you dare not deny, but would drive you insane as you are now. I never search your address or personal issues, other than posting your deeds on the web, this time you are really irritated and finally displayed the evil you to the public.

      Have some manners please. That’s not going to save you of your fate as a loser … You still have to explain to the public of your crimes behind May Zhou’s case and plotted murder on me, which got you removed from your CEO position, and so You still have to face the legal conseqences.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/7ZHHXIL2CQOG5YS23HZAEVZ5GA Peter

        Google’s era under Eric Schmidt had involved into multiple crimes in Stanford which is fascism by nature.

        Google’s Eric Schmidt had abused google resources to financially and politicially support a criminal suspect named Gabriele Scheler, along with a Stanford Computer Science faculty Sebastian Thrun, against ruling from Stanford and police authorities. During their fight with Stanford, Eric Schmidt’s side had murdered an innocent Stanford student May Zhou in 2007 to threaten me and to terrorize Stanford. When they found I would not compromise a bit but actively tried to clarify the case, Eric Schmidt’s side did plot a murder on me as well. The only reason they didn’t make it a reality is becaue they were closely watched by police and they are afraid of leaving evidence (not becasuse they have any mercy on me as a human being, fascism by nature.) Eric Schmidt lost his CEO position because of his involvment into these crimes.

        These accusations had been investigated and confirmed at authorities and stand still which Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun dare not deny to the public so far. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun had not paid for their crimes.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/7ZHHXIL2CQOG5YS23HZAEVZ5GA Peter

        This is actually a war between fascism and anti-fascism. At this stage, fascism still prevail in our lives. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun are just two forefront people we can see in this fascism circle. There is a whole pack of fascists behind them to cover up their crimes.

        Anyway, Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun’s names are not clear in Stanford Student May Zhou’s death, nor in their conspiracies on my life last year; and neither Eric Schmidt nor Sebastian Thrun dare deny their involvment into such crimes to the public. But without clarification of this case, the criminal suspect side had committed more and more retaliatory crimes on victims. Can anyone deny this fact?
        What’s their problem? I bet that’s because they are afraid of facing lawful responsibilities once they deny such accusations

        Time to clarify these anti-humanity crimes to the public and have those criminals concurred at authorities and get them pay for their crimes

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/7ZHHXIL2CQOG5YS23HZAEVZ5GA Peter

    Just now, a Guest speaker said: “The comments by “Peter” are very sad, apart from being incoherent. Whoever you are, I urge you to see a doctor and get evaluated. Seriously. No offense intended.”

    ===================My Answer===================== Blaming me for “being sad, apart from being  incoherent” is not a valid excuse to dismiss anti-humanity crimes associated with these fascism criminals.

    Freedom of speech and equal opportunity, as long as I am sticking to the facts. Facts Eric Schmidt dare not deny while publicly losing face. No University would like to advertise a fascism criminal who had endangered human lives. Anyone who read his story had the right to know the crimes assiciated with him as well. Afraid of my speech to the public?  This ‘medical help’ cliche had been repeatedly used by Schmidt’s side for many years to save their face, but in the end, they dare not deny those facts displayed in my challenges. Can you have Eric Schmidt or Sebastian Thrun deny anything in it?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WRACM77JT2RXUR3LMGDPPUGUYY Tony M

       Time for you to see your shrink, kookster.