Future University of California students may be asked to disclose their sexual orientation upon accepting an admissions offer to a UC campus.
Recent legislation and efforts to obtain this information were introduced with the goal of improving campus data and resources available for students who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. However, UC officials say this will not be implemented for the incoming class.
Both the CSU and the UC may request information about a student’s sexual orientation on the Statement of Intent to Register in order to protect students not comfortable with sharing their sexual orientation with parents or guardians.
The Board of Admissions and Relations with Schools, a committee within the systemwide Academic Senate, recommended in January that the UC work to gather this data in an effort to comply with AB 620 — state legislation passed in October 2011 that requires the California Community Colleges and California State University to collect demographic data on sexual orientation and requests the same of the UC.
Although the UC collects data on ethnic groups, socioeconomic status and other demographic categories to track issues such as retention efforts and graduation rates, Academic Senate Chair Robert Anderson said there is currently no method in place to measure how LGBT-identified students fare on UC campuses.
“We collect data on other groups, and it’s time that we treat LGBT people the same way,” he said. “I think this is a very reasonable aspect of expressing our diversity.”
According to Jesse Bernal, diversity coordinator at the UC Office of the President, discussions around this issue were already circulating prior to the passage of AB 620. Bernal said that a final decision on how to implement these efforts is “definitely at least a year out.”
Lawrence Pitts, UC provost and executive vice president for academic affairs, will make the final decision on how and when to implement a plan for the UC.
“We have an internal group that has been investigating the challenges to gather this information and how best to go about it,” Bernal said.
Similarly, CSU spokesperson Liz Chapin said that efforts at the CSU are also far from finalized. She said the CSU is still exploring the issue, but adding the question to the registration statement may be the best option.
“The bill does not have any specific timeline,” Bernal said. “The only specificity is whenever you update forms, you need to now include sexual orientation.”
Including sexual orientation in demographic efforts is largely uncharted territory at universities across the nation. According to Bernal, Elmhurst College in Illinois was the first to ask for this information in its application — a practice it began for the 2012-13 academic year.
Andrew Albright, a gay ASUC senator, said that coming to Berkeley from a conservative town was “like a breath of fresh air” and that UC Berkeley consistently ranks as one of the top schools in the country in terms of friendliness toward LGBT students.
“But that doesn’t mean that we can’t do more work,” he said. “I have friends who are called ‘faggot’ walking down the street, and I know people who have been forcibly kicked and beat at a party. Microaggressions happen every day, even in a place like Berkeley.”
Jessica Rossoni covers higher education.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Asking isn’t requiring. If you consider that information private, keep it to yourself and bear in mind that once you’ve released it to someone (especially a corporate someone), you no longer have control over it.
Who cares about a person’s sexual orientation , the fact that as a society we care so much about what 2 or 3 people do in a bedroom makes me think we have a very primitive view of human sexuality . Can we please focus on issues that affect the human race as a whole such as healthcare,job,food, etc. OMG !
This won’t change a thing…..
This is blatantly irresponsible policymaking. Stating your race is very different from stating your sexuality, and a non-disclosure option is not an acceptable compromise.
Guardians are almost inevitably a part of the application
process. What if a closeted student is forced to out themselves to their
guardians through their UC application? What if this revelation jeopardizes
their wellbeing? Conversely, should closeted LGBT applicants be forced to lie
on their applications? Such circumstances have resulted in people being kicked
out of their homes. Such circumstances have resulted in people committing
suicide. Coming out is not a process that can be coaxed along by applications
and disclosure forms and, even if these avoidable problems are not the intent
of policy makers, they are inevitably the effect.
Not comfortable disclosing your sexual orientation to your parents?
Surely you’ll have no misgivings about giving that information to UC or CSU!
I mean it’s not like the UC abuses its authority under FERPA to dig around in students mental health care files for the purpose of settling political scores…
Oh wait, they do exactly that – just ask Alex Kim about it!
Attn. Robert Anderson: GO FUCK YOURSELF.
There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the university to require you to state your sexual orientation. Fuck that noise.
The administration and legislature are a joke.
I’d advise you to check yes if you want to have any chance at receiving any scholarship money.
To paraphrase Joe Friday, “anything you say can and will be used against you”. Do any of you gay/lesbian types really think this is going to advance your agenda? What’s wrong with just keeping your personal preferences to yourselves?
For once, I completely agree with you Stan.
Stan is just upset because he had to give his sexual orientation to his college against his will. Its okay Stan, its okay.
I see the little troll child couldn’t find fault with my argument. He’s just attention-starved.