Academic affairs VP candidate platforms address transparency, student resources

Woodrow Currie, Natalie Gavello, Naomi Wilson and Frank Luna are running for ASUC academic affairs vice president.
Woodrow Currie, Natalie Gavello, Naomi Wilson and Frank Luna are running for ASUC academic affairs vice president.

Related Posts

Four candidates are running for ASUC academic affairs vice president this year, with goals that include increasing transparency and addressing fiscal challenges.

The academic affairs vice president oversees student government operations related to academic issues on campus. The position also acts as a liaison between the ASUC and the campus division of the Academic Senate.

Below are the four candidates running for the position, as well as their major platforms.

Woodrow Currie (SQUELCH!)

  • Poke fun at candidates who take elections too seriously
  • Save the world from a dystopian future

Natalie Gavello (Student Action)

  • Expand career services available to students
  • Advocate for a halt of cuts to student resources
  • Increase transparency of Operational Excellence
  • Increase the number of campus study spaces

Frank Luna (Students for a Democratic University)

  • Change ASUC rules to allow more student participation in meetings
  • Reach out to student groups to become involved in the ASUC
  • Critically re-examine the Campus Code of Student Conduct

Naomi Wilson (CalSERVE)

  • Advocate to increase openness of the campus division of the Academic Senate
  • Create more support for the American Cultures program
  • Make grants more available and accessible to students

Current Student Action AAVP Julia Joung said she would advise her successor to be prepared to respond and adapt to changing circumstances such as this past year’s Occupy Cal movement and said that candidates need to be ready for such happenings in addition to their original plans.

She also recommended that her successor work to make the office and its projects more publicly known, as many students are not aware of them.

“For the office of AAVP to be (not transparent) is a shame,” Wilson said.  “Everyone is a student here.”

Both Gavello and Wilson share the intention to increase transparency, but their focuses are in different areas. Wilson said she is interested in opening up the campus division of the faculty Academic Senate, while Gavello is particularly concerned with the transparency of the campus cost-cutting Operational Excellence initiative.

Gavello’s goal of increasing the number of study spaces on campus is a repetition of the platform of Joung’s platform from last year’s elections.

Luna, on the other hand, hopes to critically re-examine the structure of the ASUC — which he called a hierarchy — and said that Students for a Democratic University wanted to see significant changes within the student government.

The office itself goes through changes each year based on how the current AAVP wants to structure the office and what is happening within the campus.

Joung said she made her office smaller than that of her predecessor Viola Tang because that was what she was comfortable with as a leader. She said her office also focused on issues such as streamlining campus appointments and admissions policies in addition to grants.

Gavello also said she wanted to have a “small, tight-knit” office where everyone would be working on something they felt passionate about.

The election will be held April 10, 11 and 12.

Courtney Moulds covers student government.

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

5

Archived Comments (5)

  1. Qok says:

    I never need study spaces, except for during Dead Week and Finals. And even then, it’s not that bad. I don’t think that should be a priority for an executive candidate, at least… maybe a senator?

    Wilson’s dedication to the American Cultures program is fantastic. Many people really never learned actual American history in high school; as a public institution, focusing on making sure every single student learns at least a little bit of truth about our history and our culture is essential.

  2. mk says:

    I think Naomi’s platforms are solid, progressive, and achievable, and I know her to be a dedicated member of her communities. I support CalSERVE!

  3. Rukyat G. says:

    I support Naomi Wilson for Academic Senate VP!

  4. Guest says:

    “Gavello’s goal of increasing the number of study spaces on campus is a
    repetition of the platform of current Academic Affairs Vice President
    Julia Juong — who also ran with Student Action — from last year’s
    elections.”  The DailyCal should really run a story to compare how some parties’ platforms are exactly the same from year to year… and always buzzwords like communication and transparency.

  5. Gkelly41 says:

    Naomi’s platforms look the most unique and feasible of all to me. Natalie’s are a little generic for me, whereas Luna’s look like institutional changes to the ASUC that may not be achievable in the Academic Affairs space.