Selected faculty members and students will meet at an on-campus stakeholders’ meeting Friday with the advisory committee chosen to recommend a replacement for outgoing UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau.
At the meeting, which will be held at Clark Kerr campus, faculty members selected by the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate and students selected by the ASUC and Graduate Assembly presidents will have the opportunity to meet with the committee in a closed meeting to discuss qualifications of the new chancellor.
In a Thursday email to the campus community, ASUC President Vishalli Loomba and Graduate Assembly President Bahar Navab invited students to attend one of two “listening sessions” — which are open meetings — with the committee to express their thoughts and perspectives on the search for a new chancellor.
The committee will consist of five UC regents, five UC faculty members — three from UC Berkeley and two from other campuses — one undergraduate student representative, one graduate student representative, a UC Berkeley staff representative, an alumni representative and a representative from the UC Berkeley Foundation, according to UC policy.
Nine current and newly elected members of the academic senate — the elected representatives of the faculty — and other faculty members will present their views at the Friday meeting, said Bob Jacobsen, chair of the campus division of the academic senate, in a message to academic senate faculty and emeriti.
On Sunday, Student Action Senator Shahryar Abbasi was nominated and approved to serve as the undergraduate representative on the committee. Abbasi will replace Loomba, who was originally nominated, because the committee requested that the undergraduate representative be a student who would still be an undergraduate in the fall semester.
In an attempt to increase student participation at Friday’s stakeholder meeting, Loomba and Navab opened up applications for student representatives in order to select 10 students from the general student body to participate. The applications were due on April 16.
Two graduate students and eight undergraduates were selected, Navab said. The names of the students have not yet been released.
ASUC Senators Ju Hong, Elliot Goldstein and Safeena Mecklai and Graduate Assembly delegates Gordon Hoople, Heather Arata and Bianca Suarez — who were not a part of the application process — will also serve as student representatives, according to Navab.
Jacobsen told faculty and emeriti to email him if they wanted to have something presented at the Friday meeting. Individuals can also make comments on the campus website, he said in the message.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

under the prevailing conditions, any person who would accept the position of Chancellor either
i) has already abandoned all pretense of moral constraint, and is willing to lie shamelessly on a daily basis, or
ii) will be immediately marginalized, and quickly removed from the administration.
Case in point: David Kessler, was hired as UCSF chancellor, realized there was massive accounting fraud (hundreds of millions), and was fired for it.
http://chronicle.com/article/Audit-Firm-Sides-With-Ex-Dean/40376
The auditors, from KPMG, said that they couldn’t reproduce the methodologies the university had used and that its financial schedules couldn’t be reconciled with the university’s general ledger.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/05/BAI8URR5N.DTL&ao=all
“The KPMG review substantiates that there are financial irregularities for closed fiscal years,” Kessler said. “It also further substantiates the lack of fiscal controls.”
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/17/nation/na-kessler17
Kessler alleged that he was told by Richard C. Blum, now chairman of the Board of Regents, that raising “the financial stuff [was] the cancer” and that “if you piss people off for the right reason, [they're going] to figure out some way to get back at you.”
http://pogoarchives.org/m/co/grassley-letter-to-university-of-california-system-20091207.pdf
http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/alerts/whistleblower-issues/wi-wp-20091208.html
Why are these meetings closed?
Probably so people can talk to the Regents without students chanting stupid demands.
B/c only certain functions are required to be open to the public under the Bagley-Keene Act of 1967.
Something as simple as looking into the relevant statutes is far beyond Arnie’s capabilities.