Campus officials say costs related to Occupy the Farm top $300,000

Related Posts

The costs incurred as a result of the occupation of UC-owned land in Albany and the May 14 police raid on the encampment total more than $300,000, according to UC Berkeley and city of Albany officials.

The campus will seek to recoup its losses in a civil suit filed against 15 Occupy the Farm protesters. According to campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof, as of June 13, costs incurred to UCPD are estimated at $311,915.

In an effort to prove that the land would be better utilized with urban farming, the group began occupying and cultivating the land, known as Gill Tract, in April, only to be forcibly removed by police last month. The tract is used by the College of Natural Resources to conduct plant research.

According to Mogulof, the campus estimates that it spent $89,045 on mutual aid costs for officers from seven other UC campuses for their time and room and board; $84,268 on overtime costs of UCPD officers; $63,717 on contract officials provided by the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office; $53,523 on private security contractors and $21,362 on supplies and equipment.

As for the cleanup efforts, Mogulof estimates another $53,548 will go to Physical Plant and Campus Services for materials and labor costs related to the repair of fences, gates, locks, pipes and lighting rental at the Gill Tract.

Albany Police Chief Mike McQuiston estimated his department incurred $16,965 in overtime costs for officers, public safety dispatchers and other support personnel involved in the raid, as well as an additional $100 in expenditures for miscellaneous related materials and supplies.

McQuiston said in an email that his department’s involvement in the raid was focused “on minimizing risk to persons, property and governmental operations outside the Gill Tract should there be any ‘spillover’ effects, and in coordinating operational aspects such as traffic safety and parking control, while also ensuring the right of all persons to peaceably assemble.”

According to McQuiston, the city’s public works department also spent $320 for overtime as a result of the raid. McQuiston said in the email that he had no plans to seek reimbursement for the expenses, nor was he aware of any cost recovery efforts being pursued by the city.

However, the university is planning to recoup its losses by seeking damages in its civil suit against the protesters.

“We cannot be forced to bear the burdens of illegal activities,” Mogulof said.

Mogulof said he does not yet have the official amount the university is seeking in the civil suit because the university is still compiling the total cost, which includes punitive damages, costs of the suit and attorneys’ fees.

Upon learning of the costs incurred to the university, the city of Albany and the Albany Police Department, Gopal Dayaneni — an Occupy the Farm spokesperson and one of the protesters named in the civil suit — said the university chose to act on the occupation but did not have to.

“They chose to militarize the space,” Dayaneni said. “It was overkill and unnecessary, and it is an absurdity to say that Occupy the Farm is responsible for that.”

Dayaneni said the university is “trying to quash public speech and public advocacy” with the suit.

Occupy the Farm’s month-long occupation of the Gill Tract created public awareness for food sovereignty and urban agriculture, according to Dayaneni.

“There was unprecedented community participation in that space,” he said.

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

36

Archived Comments (36)

  1. Guest says:

    Look, Occupy is not about penny-pinching with the UC; they’re about complete and systemic economic change. They are not interested in half-assing any sort of reform by micromanaging budgets. So to make omelettes you have to break a couple eggs.

  2. Farm Digger says:

    Consider that the Alameda County DA dropped charges against 9 out of 9 people arrested at the farm by UCPD. That goes a LONG way to prove that the expenses were unnecessary. 

    If somebody drops a fly in your soup and you choose to get rid of the fly by renting a bulldozer, you don’t get to sue for the cost of the bulldozer.

  3. FreeSyria says:

    Russia out of Syria in global protest!!! Build the movement and take Assad down and send Russia on its way. Russia Out of Syria!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Unite the globe. Unite Syria

    • reztips says:

      And after that, send Islamofascists out of Syria. Remember, it was Assad who for years housed the leaders of the pro-genocidal Ham-Ass…

  4. FreeSyria says:

    Russia out of Syria in global protest!!! Build the movement and take Assad down and send Russia on its way. Russia Out of Syria!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Unite the globe. Unite Syria

  5. Sids22 says:

    I wondered why days after the raid the land was protected by ten guards and two cop cars.Now I see that it was done to pad the bill

  6. Tony M says:

     Being a “student” doesn’t give you carte blanche to destroy the property of others. You people are seriously delusional on a number of points.

  7. ArwenUndomniel says:

       This is a joke and a smoke screen! How is the University ever going to collect $300,000 from a group of 15 young adults who wanted to Occupy the land in order to grow crops to feed the community? Talk about overkill.

       This is a smokescreen because the University rakes in millions of dollars from multi-national corporations who lease the land to grow crops such as GMOs that destroy our food supply. The land was suppose to be use to do research and grow crops that would benefit the public but instead the University has violated it’s ethical and legal duties to the public and leased University property for profit and not the public good.

        This is a great case to take to trial because it will be tried in the press and the public will know all the financial and illegal activity the University has been doing.

    • Guest says:

      If you think the public is generally supportive of what happened to the Gill Tract you’re SERIOUSLY mistaken.  If you think you can disrupt agricultural research and just walk away without consequences you’re in for a helluva reality check.   

      Tell you what:  we can talk about how UC Berkeley is corrupt and evil and greedy and all that drivel you keep spouting ONCE THE MONEY IS PAID BACK BY THE SCOUNDRELS THAT CAUSED THE DAMAGE.  And since occupy didn’t leave the Gill Tract of their own accord, YES, POLICE WERE NECESSARY TO EVICT THEIR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASSES.  Therefore, that’s part of the tab whether you like it or not.

      K, I’m done. 

    • Tony M says:

       [ This is a joke and a smoke screen! How is the University ever going to
      collect $300,000 from a group of 15 young adults who wanted to Occupy
      the land in order to grow crops to feed the community?]

      They had NO interest in “growing crops to feed the community” – all they wanted was attention. As far as how they are going to pay for it, maybe they should get jobs.

      • ArwenUndomniel says:

        There are no jobs or haven’t you heard. The University knows that. This is more publicity hype. I love it…the University pays their attorneys to try and collect a judgment on people who have no money and the taxpayers pay for their lawyer’s fees. Brilliant!!

        • Guest says:

          Perhaps we should hit the fifteen for court costs too!

          • ArwenUndomniel says:

            No but we can pay MANY THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN ATTORNEYS FEES OUT OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS to get a judgment and try and collect it from people we already know cannot pay it. That will show them. Brilliant!  

          • Guest says:

            I’m HAPPY to pay said attorneys’ fees to teach your ilk a lesson.  Ever heard of wage garnishment?  It can follow someone for the rest of their natural lives. They can be MADE to pay it.  Trust me.  

            And no, it’s not brilliant; it’s just what ought to and evidently will happen.

            By the way, young jedi, your fleet is lost.  And your friends on the Endor moon will not survive.    The alliance will die. 

        • Tony M says:

           [There are no jobs or haven't you heard. The University knows that.]

          And whose fault is that again?  Yet I bet you’re enough of an idiot to vote for the same person who had been in office for over 3 years now, and still doesn’t have a clue.

        • reztips says:

          If they can’t pay, the law should put them away.

          Don’t forget, the deadbeat of today is the drug dealer of tomorrow…

    • reztips says:

      If some of these Occutards are students, and a successful law suit vs them by the University succeeds, then they may not be able to re-enroll and far more worthy students will take their place. In other words, addition by subtraction.

      Moreover, the judge could tap their future salaries should they start earning their keep at McDonalds or as drug dealers in their beloved Peoples Park…

  8. Keep It_in Perspective says:

    UCOP spent $6.6 BILLION in a 5 year period and called it ‘miscellaneous services’.
    hmm, lets see here 300,000 vs 6,600,000,000?

    what a joke.
    Fuck the administration.

    • reztips says:

      $300,000 the University no longer has thanks to the Occutards could pay the tuition for some students and the salaries of some professors. It ain’t chump change…

  9. Citizen says:

    Doesn’t this seem excessive to observe a peaceful occupation by students while on property owned by the school?  These days our own students seem to be considered,  personae non gratae.

  10. Current student says:

     Another great victory for the fleabaggers and occutards!  You really stuck it to the taxpayers, oops I mean The Man, this time!!

    I’ll be thinking of you ***holes when the regents pass another fee increase this year.

    • Current Lying Clown says:

       hey retard, how big is the UC’s budget?

      • Current student says:

         hey occutard, how big is the UC budget surplus?

        oh that’s right, UC has a gaping DEFICIT.  every dollar counts, fleabagger scum.

        • Tony M says:

           [hey occutard, how big is the UC budget surplus?]

          Thank you. At least someone here gets it…

        • ArwenUndomniel says:

          The only reason the UC budget is at a deficit is because the University keeps raising their own salaries. I love it! Get and job and raise my salary when I want to remodel my house, buy a boat, go on an expensive vacation, see the world. And you “Current Student” appear to not mind paying. Great! I am interested in a trip to Europe. Can I send you my budget for the trip and have you can pay for it in advance? Thanks! You are VERY generous. What a nice person!!

          • Tony M says:

             [The only reason the UC budget is at a deficit is because the University keeps raising their own salaries.]

            That’s not the only reason, and as long as you continue to make your silly simplifications of complex issues, nobody with half a brain is going to take anything you say seriously.

          • reztips says:

            If the UC cut worthless programs such as the Ethnic and Middle East Studies dep’ts, the deficit would be lower…

          • Chrisjuricich says:

            How controversial. I get it, the occupiers taking the farm, UC protecting its interests, but now suing the farm occupiers…too much. Good luck getting that money from occupiers…jeezis.

    • Phil Perspective says:

       Stay classy!!  Great way to prove you’ve got nothin’!!

    • C. Longstaff says:

       Whining white wing weenie wanking wacko!