On Wednesday, July 18, the UC Board of Regents endorsed Gov. Jerry Brown’s Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012 tax initiative after securing a $125.4 million tuition increase buyout. If the initiative, Proposition 30, is successful, the 2012-13 academic year will mark the first time since the 2006-07 academic year that undergraduate student fees do not increase. However, if the initiative does not pass, the university will lose the tuition buyout and face an additional $250 million cut. Thus, if the initiative fails, the University of California will experience a $375.4 million shortfall in the upcoming academic year. This type of shortfall would be absolutely devastating.
What does this mean for the university? The initiative presents an opportunity to pursue financial stability. While the initiative is far from perfect, it provides students with immediate relief. Students have carried the burden of inadequate state funding for far too long. The initiative would provide funding to ensure that students do not experience another fee increase in the 2012-13 academic year. Additionally, the governor’s administration has stated an intention to enter a multiyear funding agreement with the UC and CSU systems to provide steady increases to each university’s budget over a four-year period. Alternatively, if the initiative fails, the UC system will face an enormous budget deficit, which could lead to cuts and fee increases. In short, passage of the initiative could redirect the trajectory of the university for the better, while its failure could lead to business as usual.
Finally, the initiative serves as an opportunity for Californians to reclaim the university. In recent years, the state Legislature has significantly cut funding for higher education, yet there has not been a unified statewide response. The initiative provides Californians with the opportunity to demonstrate their support for the university. The initiative’s passage depends on the collaborative efforts of UC students, staff, faculty, employees and Californians. Students must mobilize on each campus and lead effective voter registration drives to build student vote power. UC faculty and staff must emerge from behind their office desks to voice their support for the initiative. UC workers must continue to support higher education and garner support from their constituency. Californians from every city across the state must reclaim their stake in the state by casting a vote in favor of its future. The initiative’s passage would mark an electoral victory, but, most importantly, it could foster a greater sense of ownership from California’s public.
The university has reached a critical point. If we do not act now, it will face incredibly difficult times. Californians must act for university to continue to fulfill its mission to educate the state’s best and brightest, to produce cutting-edge research, to employ hundreds of thousands of workers and to produce national leaders. The university’s success depends on Californians as much as California’s success depends on the university.
Cinthia Flores is the UC student regent-designate.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.


Cinthia’s opinion piece reads like a ransom note. “Do this or else…!” But at least she has the basic facts straight. One fact she left out is that CalPERS underperformed by 86% so who knows what our politicians will do to make it up. Borrow from UC?
http://www.sgvtribune.com/opinions/ci_21127503/our-view-calpers-paltry-performance-rings-alarm-cities
Cinthia, I will vote for this if you don’t vote for Loni Hancock. I am not about to vote for taxes, if you will just reelect one of the people who has been instrumental in increasing tuition for UC students. Every student that votes for the initiative needs to recognize that we are in this position because of the legislature. So be sure to vote out the incumbent who has cut our funding for years.
Yet passing the tax will only bring us to the level of last year, not even coming close to rollback the drastic cuts from 2008-2010. The question is, are we postponing the catastrophe by only a year?
The increase in sales tax is regressive and hurt the poor the most.
Vote NO on Tax Increases.
Cinthia Flores- another one suckered into propagandizing for the bureaucracy.
A good little Moonbeam sheeple.
Stupid GDIs trying to do shit
Go FRATLIFE !
Reclaim the state, force the already over taxed middle class to be taxed even more. Why cut spending or re-direct spending from bloated retirement and pension plans when you can just force the rich to pay more!!!…That is until the rich and middle class decide to leave (Did you know CA loses something like 2 millionaires a day?)…I’m a student and I’ll be voting NO