Partial disclosure: I, Noah Ickowitz, am a former ASUC senator with the SQUELCH! party. Don’t you worry. I can still recognize the obnoxious, delusional and limiting parts of our student government. Luckily, I can also commend the fantastic parts of it. I will try to give you as much of a balance between the two as possible.
For you as readers, I will provide analysis and even more than that — new information that will blow your Cal socks right off — if you care about this stuff. The actions and absence of actions by the ASUC in and out of official meetings bring a fantastically dramatic dimension to the student government and will hopefully do the same for this column. My stories will make you feel like Gossip Girl and The West Wing had a love child named the ASUC. The ridiculous amounts of money students spend on their election campaigns would make even Meg Whitman weep. Juiciness will be for another day, but I encourage you to read on.
Some students on campus are so enamored by Berkeley’s student government to the point where they can’t see its flaws. Opposite from these ASUC loyalists stand the rebellious individuals who believe not only that the student government does nothing, but also that it is evil incarnate. As most things go, the truth rests somewhere in between the extremes — I realize that is not rocket science.
First, to those of you who think the ASUC does nothing, I’m sorry, you’re wrong.
Senators wrote hundreds of bills last year, allocated thousands of dollars to student groups and held absurdly long weekly meetings. Former CalSERVE Senator Andy Albright worked to move more than $3 million in ASUC funds into a more “responsible” bank. Former External Affairs Vice President Joey Freeman led a campaign to redistrict the entire city of Berkeley in order to increase student representation on the Berkeley City Council. Whether these moves were prudent or in line with your ideologies, there is no doubt that these actions have tangible consequences.
Now, to those of you who think that the ASUC is completely autonomous and has done only good: I’m sorry, you’re wrong, too. I’d love to believe that students still completely control the bookstore or the businesses on Lower Sproul Plaza, but that’s simply not true. A Commercial and Student Services Board exists, which does have student representatives, but administration remains prominent on the board. Soon we will either have to work to regain more control or admit that we just don’t have as much power as we think we do. I will concede that the ASUC does control the Cal Lodge, which allows for great skiing — just what we need in times of financial crisis. My problems with the Cal Lodge will be revealed at another time, but yes, I’m sure many of you did not know it exists — which is part of the problem. The powers of the ASUC lie more in its human capital than in its financial assets.
It’s true that it was not always this way. We did at one point in time own the bookstore. But senators serve one-year terms, and rarely do they run for re-election. As you can imagine, this turnover rate prompts fresh leadership year after year with little to no governing experience behind most senators. After all, we did once get bailed out by the university, which led to the creation of the current Commercial and Student Services board system.
Life away from the ASUC can sometimes feel like breathing without air, but stepping back from the senate has given me insight that I didn’t always have whilst arguing until two in the morning with my fellow senators. But don’t get me wrong. The two major political entities, Student Action and CalSERVE, do occasionally unite by party at the expense of students. Although this still angers and frustrates me to the core, I now realize the existence of these parties inadvertently highlights the awesomeness of the ASUC. Since many schools do not even have student-made political parties, the very existence of these parties showcases the intensity and seriousness of our student government. I am proud of that intensity.
At the core of this column rests information that will make you cringe, cry and laugh. Never hesitate to email me with tips, praises or words of contempt. For those of you freshmen who don’t yet understand why the student government has such a presence on our campus, I can hold your hand in the spring as we walk through Sproul Plaza and get berated by flyers. I mean that in the least creepy way possible.
Contact Noah Ickowitz at [email protected].
Follow him on Twitter @noahickowitz.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

When will ASUC be voting on divestment from Israel? This may slow down Israel’s drive to bomb Iran.
You know what would also slow down anyone’s drive to bomb Iran? If Iran stopped trying to build nuclear weapons while also supporting terrorist groups and calling for the complete destruction of a couple nations.
Mr. Ickowitz, I voted for you as ASUC President because of your honest, critical, and thoughtful writing (especially on the AC Transit Pass). Great to see that you have a more permanent presence on here. As a member of the ASUC, I look forward to reading these columns about the structural problems, ASUC issues as well as ASUC victories throughout this year.
This isn’t a bad idea, and you’re the right guy to write it, but instead of telling us what you were going to do with your column, you should just have done it.
Noah is a fall columnist, meaning that he will write under this column periodically. We can assume that the tales he promises will come in later columns.
As long as you are as honest as you were at http://www.dailycal.org/2012/03/12/farrakhans-words-bring-more-harm-than-good/ (“Sign the petition to oppose Farrakhan’s harmful words”) this will be a great column to look forward to on Friday mornings.
For starters, please discuss the groupthink all too common in the ASUC and how the ASUC’s votes are not representative of all students.
For example, in today’s paper:
“ASUC Senate unanimously endorses Prop. 30″
http://www.dailycal.org/2012/09/13/asuc-endorses-prop-30/
Because of the unanimous nature of the bill’s passage, some students
expressed a concern that the diversity of student opinion was not fairly
represented by the senators.
Shawn Lewis, executive director of the Berkeley College Republicans,
criticized senators for voting unanimously on an issue that he said many
students may disagree on.
“I see this as a failure by the senators to reach out and hear other
viewpoints,” Lewis said. “They had said they would try to include other
views, but I haven’t seen that. I’m not surprised.”
Senator Klein Lieu, who authored the bill, rejected the idea that
senators had misrepresented the campus community and said the senate
speaks on behalf of all students. He emphasized the importance of the
ASUC’s endorsement and the impact the election will have on the future
of the university.
I strongly oppose Proposition 30 and am disturbed that Senator Klein Lieu is saying that the senate’s unanimous vote on the issue is representative of my opinion and that “the senate
speaks on behalf of all students.”
Senator Lieu’s words cannot be farther from the truth.
Specific discussions about issues like these will give your column a dose of honesty and reality not seen since Casey Given’s column last year and not seen in the Daily Cal at all this year.
Don’t discuss boring safe matters. Take on the difficult issues and the readers will respect you.
You may oppose Proposition 30, but your exaggeration of Senator Klein lieu’s opinion is unfounded! “cannot be farther from the truth” is a heavy qualification for such a statistical statement: yes, you are correct that the Academic Senate does not speak on behalf of *all* students, but it is fair to say that an elected body of students speaks for *some* students. And further, it is easy to see that *some* students, saddled with the rising costs of this educational system, will support Proposition 30 in its tax-the-top ideals. Students stand to benefit, fiscally. The ASUC works to benefit students.
You claim to host honesty and reality, but your stance against Proposition 30 has me unconvinced. What is your argument against it? Throwing money at our problem isn’t the solution, obviously — but is it too evil to push for “those with the most” to support the opportunities for others that will further the welfare of our university, state, country, and society?
Vote NO on Prop 30.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-23/new-california-taxes-pay-for-pensions-not-schools.html
Do you seriously believe that Senator Klein Lieu is correct when he says “the senate
speaks on behalf of all students”?
Absolutely not!
Senator Klein Lieu DID NOT say SOME students. He said ALL.
Senator Klein Lieu was being dishonest when he said he spoke on behalf of ALL students.
I oppose Prop 30 because its more money that will go to unions.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-23/new-california-taxes-pay-for-pensions-not-schools.html
The reality is that California is the third highest taxed state in the country, but our education system is in the bottom five in the nation. We are ranked as one of the worst states to do business in the country, and we have lost more businesses than we have gained for quite some time now. We are also net losers in the population of higher income individuals as the wealthy have relocated to other areas of the nation instead of moving to California.
Proposition 30 is not going to be a savior just like the lottery wasn’t a savior for education in California. Prop 30 doesn’t even designate funds to the UC. We just hope that it will prevent the legislature and governor from cutting our funds. What would work better is to make a more focused state budget that doesn’t waste the high tax revenues we already have, because we do have a lot of tax revenues. Our state just runs itself as well as the ASUC runs the student store.