Code of conduct violation leads to removal of five players

Head coach Kirk Everist confirmed Monday that five players were removed from the Cal men's water polo team after violating an undisclosed team code of conduct policy.
Tony Zhou/File
Head coach Kirk Everist confirmed Monday that five players were removed from the Cal men's water polo team after violating an undisclosed team code of conduct policy.

Related Posts

Five players have been removed from the Cal men’s water polo team due to a violation of the team’s code of conduct, head coach Kirk Everist confirmed Sunday night.

On Monday, Everist said the five players removed from the team are senior goalie and team captain Justin Parsons, sophomore attacker Max Bergeson, junior attacker Perry Short, junior attacker Tommy Gilfillan and sophomore attacker Nick Santala.

“We had a code of conduct problem,” Everist said. “We had a number of players that gave me no choice but to remove them from the team.”

Everist said that the code of conduct is not signed by players but is an internally recognized code that the all the athletes know about.

He would not say what the code of conduct violation was, citing his players’ and team’s right to privacy. Athletic Director Sandy Barbour also declined to comment on the situation.

But when the Bears jumped in the pool this weekend for the NorCal Invite in Stanford, some familiar faces were missing. In one of the most competitive tournaments of the year, the absences of Parsons in the cage and Bergeson on offense were impossible to miss.

In terms of the situation affecting the team, there is little doubt that the loss of so many impact players will influence the dynamic of a program that had national title hopes this season.

“Those guys will be missed,” senior team captain Marin Balarin said. “Those guys were our teammates and our friends, but we have to keep moving on. We don’t have time at this point in the season to lose focus.”

Senior Mason Cox echoed Balarin’s sentiments but still managed to see a case for team improvement in the situation.

“It hurts, but in the end I think it helps the team,” Cox said. “It makes us focus a lot more. It puts things in perspective. I think it makes the teams stronger as a whole and takes individualism out of the equation. You realize what you have to do as team.”

The last time that the Cal water polo team experienced a mid-season exodus was in 2009, when starting goalie Jacob McIntosh left and was replaced by Wil Toppen.

Midseason removals are surprising, but not unprecedented for Cal athletic teams. Last year, then-sophomore Richard Solomon was cut from the men’s basketball team for the remainder of the season in a high-profile case of academic ineligibility.

This past August, linebacker Cecil Whiteside was also declared academically ineligible and was dismissed from the football team. However, he was reinstated shortly thereafter.

In 2008, football team member R.J. Garrett and former player Gary Doxy were arrested on suspicion of robbery at Clark Kerr Campus.

For the Cal men’s water polo team, the removal of five players equates to the loss of about a fifth of the active roster.

Despite going 2-2 at the NorCal tournament this weekend, the Bears are confident that they are still national-scale contenders with the talent that remains.

“Kirk told us after the game that this weekend showed us that the talent is still there and the ability is still there,” Cox said. “If we can play together, we can still compete for a national championship.”

A previous version of this article may have implied that Jacob McIntosh left the Cal men’s water polo team in 2009 in similar fashion to the exit of the five players, when in fact he quit due to personal reasons.

A previous version of the photo caption accompanying this article may have implied that head coach Kirk Everist confirmed on Monday the removal of five players. In fact, he confirmed the names of the five players, thereby reconfirming the removal.

A previous version of this article incorrectly spelled Richard Solomon’s name.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Joe

    What is Richard Solomon’s current academic status with Cal?

  • A Cal Student

    I have class with one of the players. He said the five players were removed for smoking weed. My thoughts on this: If you were told once before to abide by team rules then you should have done so. Said player also made the comment that he felt the dismissal was BS because the football players get away with it all the time. To his statement I say good point. However, it is idiotic to think that just because Coach Tedford turns a blind eye to his players who smoke weed does not mean that Coach Everist will be okay with it, therefore you should be able to get away with it. The last thing the player said before we all moved on was that at least the water polo team has had success the past couple of years despite smoking weed, the football players smoke weed and suck. What’s their excuse? I don’t think either program should condone the behavior, but I do think he has a valid point about the football players. Maybe if Tedford and his crew actually expressed some authority the way that Coach Everist did we would have a football team that actually took their jobs seriously. Nonetheless, team rules are in place for a reason, abide by them or don’t play. Sounds pretty simple.

  • Coach Everist

    I think someone might’ve gotten Sandusky’d….

  • ondal

    You spelled Richard Solomon’s name wrong. You also failed to mention that Cecil Whiteside was reinstated to the team.

  • Alum

    Announcing these dismissals under a “code of conduct” cloud, then citing “right to privacy” as a reason not to elaborate further?? IF respecting privacy were a priority with this coach THEN perhaps he shouldn’t have called the press conference.

    You can dismiss someone without announcing to the world the reason, Coach. “They are no longer with the team” is all that need be stated. You want to brand them with a scarlet “A”? Fine, but don’t try to pretend that you are concerned for their rights. Be man enough to admit that their transgression was so heinous that you wanted to hurt them publicly because we all know that was your purpose in speaking out and you aren’t fooling anyone.

    The University should protect its students from men like this. You either offer full disclosure or you say nothing. It is yet another example of Barbour’s weak leadership in allowing her charges to get away with such a juvenile display.

    • Guest

      we are all stupider for having read this comment