Trust in the future

STATE ISSUES: Gov. Jerry Brown’s veto of the TRUST Act, while understandable, hinders a logical policy reform. The act must pass in the future.

Related Posts

Undocumented immigrants who commit minor crimes should not be deported.

If Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation known as the TRUST Act, that principle would be state law. But he vetoed the bill, saying that it was “fatally flawed.” Under the bill, local law enforcement would not comply with an immigration detainer unless an undocumented immigrant committed serious or violent crimes. Brown argued that many crimes, such as those involving drug trafficking and child abuse, were left out of the bill. While his veto is understandable because the bill should be as complete as possible, it is a major setback for progress on immigration policy.

Brown could have prevented a veto by ensuring that when the TRUST Act reached his desk, it was a bill he could sign. In his veto message, Brown made it clear that he supports the idea of the act and wants it to become law; he stated that federal officials shouldn’t “coerce” local law enforcement into holding people who “pose no reasonable threat to their community.” But if the governor really supported the act wholeheartedly, he should have communicated his concerns to the Legislature. If enacted into law, this act would have huge implications, providing much-needed protection for the many undocumented immigrants Brown seems to support.

Without the act’s passage, undocumented immigrants across the state remain at risk unnecessarily. It is unfair to leave open to deportation individuals who grew up in the United States, make valuable contributions to society and pose no threat to their community. Deportation resulting from a minor crime is the worst case scenario, but it is a very real threat for many people until the TRUST Act becomes law. That fear has also “eroded community trust for local law enforcement,” according to a statement on the website of the the act’s author, state Assemblymember Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco.

Despite these negative consequences, and the criticism that the veto prompted, Brown’s decision is not indicative of his overall attitude toward undocumented immigrants. Aside from his veto message, Brown proved his support for that community in the past when he signed the state DREAM Act into law — allowing undocumented students to receive financial aid — and, more recently, when he signed a bill that will enable some undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses.

At the local level, Berkeley City Council voted in June to craft a policy aimed at accomplishing the same end as the TRUST Act. City Councilmember Jesse Arreguin indicated that the city is still proceeding with its plans despite the act’s failures, and it should. Since reform is moving much too slowly at the state level, the least the city can do is protect the local community.

It is imperative that the state move quickly to amend the TRUST Act’s deficiencies as soon as possible. Brown claimed in his veto message that he “will work with the Legislature to see that the bill is corrected forthwith.” He must live up to his word.

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

19

Archived Comments (19)

  1. guest says:

    Your beloved Jerry voted against your agenda, so you say ‘oh it’s understandable why he did it…but in the future…’ imagine if this was a republican how your tone would change….I came here legally in 2001, and got my green card in 2010, and now am a citizen. I know how much it sucks to be a legal immigrant in this country. This mess needs to be fixed. Fix the stupid Bush era immigration legislation, which made immigration way too difficult, and stop creating loopholes to get illegos into this country…I would vote for a president who vows to do a sweep of the nation to kick out the illegos.

  2. Diana says:

    I am not sure if this editorial makes me want to laugh or cry…

  3. peepsqueek says:

    A half million Mexican-Americans and illegal Mexicans marched in LA a few years ago for an amnesty. It was purely self serving, because if we had 12 million illegal Russians, Chinese, or Arabians, not one Mexican would be out there marching for the amnesty and moral justice. If there were 12 million Muslims marching for amnesty instead of Catholics, you would not see all those priests marching for amnesty along side them. You cannot have one group being illegally served over another.

    Legal aliens, who sign the guest list on the way in, will work just as hard as an illegal alien, and then we will know who they are, the tax payer is not over burdened with the health, education, transportation, or even the criminal activity of their children will not be an added burden. Do we as citizens have any choice in this matter?

  4. Calipenguin says:

    Under our system of government states must obey federal law. Federal requests for detainers are not just a friendly suggestion: they are official commands from federal law enforcement. What if an illegal alien belonging to al Qaeda is picked up for stealing ammonium nitrate? Under the TRUST Act he would be let go by California’s police departments. In any case, the TRUST Act is unnecessary because Obama has already said he won’t deport any illegal aliens who didn’t commit very serious crimes, so ICE can’t deport them. If Romney becomes the next President he will likely sign federal legislation gutting the TRUST Act completely.

  5. I_h8_disqus says:

    Shouldn’t illegal immigrants be deported just because they are here illegally? We don’t need any other reason to deport them.

  6. Stan De San Diego says:

    > Undocumented immigrants who commit
    > minor crimes should not be deported.

    Why not?

    • libsrclowns says:

      Because they are members of Obama’s protected class. Now they can get a drivers license and vote for Obama. See how it works?

      • Stan De San Diego says:

        Well I guess Zero needs all the votes he can get, given that his re-election campaign is turning into a slow-motion train wreck.

        • Guest says:

          Too bad for you the train wreck is so slow that he’s still poised for re-election in November. If Romney can’t win a state like Ohio (>80% white and <5% hispanic, as a sidenote), he only has himself to blame.

          • Stan De San Diego says:

            Apparently you haven’t been paying attention to the news as of late.

          • Guest says:

            http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/karen_heller/20121007_Karen_Heller__Romney_T-shirt_episode_offers__teachable_moment__-_for_parents_and_teachers.html

            Hey Stan and libsrclowns. Here an article about how liberals treat anyone who has the temerity to support Romney:

            What happened to Samantha Pawlucy, also known as Romney Girl, most
            likely feeds into every conservative Pennsylvanian’s perception of our
            city as a cesspool of Democratic liberals.


            At her public school a week ago Friday, the Port Richmond sophomore
            says she was dissed on dress-down day because she had the temerity to
            wear a Romney/Ryan T-shirt, embracing the minority group our city least
            tolerates: Republicans.

            Geometry teacher Lynette Gaymon told Samantha that Charles Carroll
            High – a model of diversity with an enrollment that’s one-third black,
            one-third white, and a third Latino – was a “Democratic” school.


            In Philadelphia, registered Democrats outnumber voters in the
            Republican/Philadelphia Parking Authority Party 6-1. You could
            reasonably argue that every city academic institution is a Democratic
            school, even one like Carroll, named for a rich aristocratic Federalist.


            Gaymon also likened wearing the pink Romney/Ryan shirt in a Democratic school to the teacher’s sporting a Ku Klux Klan top.


            I’m sorry to inform you, though you probably have guessed, that Samantha, 16, is white and Gaymon, 29, is black.

            Lib-thought: Free speech only for anyone who agrees with you.

          • Guest2 says:

            Polls show Romney pulling ahead in Ohio.

      • Guest says:

        By the way, do you actually think anyone with a driving license can vote? You don’t need to be a citizen to get a driving license…