Comma plus conjunction

It has come to my attention that people often don’t know how to use commas properly, so I’ll point out a misuse that has been bugging me lately.

See the sentence above? It contains two independent clauses separated by a comma and a conjunction (so). It’s a rule most of us learned in middle school: Use a comma and a conjunction when combining two independent clauses.

It’s an easy grammar rule to remember. What people can’t seem to remember, or perhaps understand altogether, is that it is erroneous, incorrect, HORRIBLY WRONG to include a comma before a conjunction followed by a dependent clause.

Example: I encounter these mistakes almost everywhere, and cringe each time.

Notice the lack of a subject in the second part of the sentence. This is not OK. If it were a sentence on its own, it would be “Cringe each time,” which is a command that doesn’t make sense in this context.

The correct way to express my disgust at aforementioned grammatical blunders is as follows: I encounter these mistakes almost everywhere, and I cringe each time.

Look! It’s an independent clause! It has a subject and a verb! I’d like to give a pat on the back to those out there who remember one of the most basic grammar rules from back in the day. Thank you for caring about coherence.

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

1

Archived Comments (1)

  1. james says:

    you know what is also not ok? your using ALL CAPS in a grammar column.