FBI ordered to pay UC Berkeley alumnus $470,000

Related Posts

A federal judge ruled Oct. 17 that the Federal Bureau of Investigation must pay a UC Berkeley alumnus and former Daily Californian writer nearly half a million dollars for withholding records concerning the bureau’s covert activities during the 1950s and 60s.

Seth Rosenfeld, who first requested documents from the bureau more than three decades ago, won $470,459 in attorney fees for two lawsuits he filed against the FBI under the Freedom of Information Act in 1990 and 2007.

The two cases involved requests of records pertaining to Ronald Reagan’s role as a private informant to the FBI when he was a Hollywood actor and governor of California and the bureau’s activities on UC Berkeley’s campus during the Cold War.

Rosenfeld used the documents he received to write his book “Subversives: The FBI’s War on Student Radicals, and Reagan’s Rise to Power,” which details the FBI’s secret involvement on campus during the 1960s.

Department of Justice attorneys, who represented the FBI, argued that the bureau did not need to pay the attorney fees because officials would have released the information anyway, according to a press release from the First Amendment Project, an Oakland-based nonprofit organization that provided legal representation to Rosenfeld. However, in his ruling earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen found that the bureau had unreasonably withheld the requested records.

FBI officials declined to comment on the ruling.

“I’m gratified that Judge Chen has held the FBI accountable for improperly withholding public information,” said Rosenfeld, who began his research into these records in 1977 during his senior year at UC Berkeley. “I hope that this ruling will encourage government agencies to comply with the FOIA.”

The awards fees won last Wednesday will be split between the First Amendment Project and Bryan Cave, the firm that worked with Rosenfeld in filing for the fees. These awards, coupled with those won through an earlier ruling, bring the total that the FBI has had to pay Rosenfeld for attorney fees to more than $1 million, according to the press release. Additionally, the release stated that the FBI has spent more than $1 million processing the requested records.

Rosenfeld has filed a total of five lawsuits against the FBI under the FOIA. The most recent lawsuit, concerning documents related to Black Panther Party member and FBI informant Richard Aoki, is still pending a hearing date.

Contact Alex Berryhill at [email protected].

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

4

Archived Comments (4)

  1. Current Student says:

    Apparently if you file enough frivolous nuisance lawsuits, you just might hit the jackpot.

  2. When the FBI loses a civil suit, which they will drag out for years, they simply collect some taxpayer money to pay off their crime. Where is the disincentive to continue committing crimes? If you are interested in Seth Rosenfeld’s story of past FBI crimes and their attempts to conceal them, you may be interested in their current illegal covert activities. You can only read about those with a search for ‘New police weapon against homeless” and “Historic coverup of FBI and police crimes currently taking place”. You will also read about my court appearance yesterday. [email protected] Masters degree Harding University 1993

  3. Guest says:

    Just keep failing lawsuits until one lands with an activist judge who agrees with you.

    What an a$$hole.

    • Just Sayin' says:

      Or conversely, comply with the law to prevent such punitive relief. Also, why do you assume it’s an activist judge? Do you know anything about FOIA?