Letter to the editor: Homeless youth are not always homeless by choice in the city of Berkeley

In his Oct. 22 column “Homeless by Choice,” Jason Willick describes a population of young people coming to Berkeley who are part of a youth subculture just wanting to travel around from place to place — more or less having adventures. As someone who has worked with homeless youth in Berkeley for 10 years, setting up the Telegraph Avenue homeless youth drop in center back in 1996 and now working as director of Youth Spirit Artworks, one of the two groups specifically working with homeless youth here in Berkeley today, I would like to address this giant myth.

Jason, if someone you meet on the street asks you how you are doing, what do you tell them? You say, “fine” right, even if you aren’t? If you talk to them for two hours, or maybe two weeks, would you still even then tell them your deepest secrets? I very much doubt it! In 1998 — and things have not changed in who is out there on Telegraph Avenue since 1998 — the city of Berkeley carried out a significant study of homeless youth in Berkeley by hiring veteran social worker Wendy Georges. Georges now runs Alameda County’s TRUST Clinic, which works with hard to reach homeless people. Georges’ results from months of talking with youth showed that an estimated 44 percent of Berkeley’s homeless street youth were victims of either sexual abuse or physical violence. 4 of the 27 youth surveyed in the study were experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder. One hundred percent were medicating the pain related to their trauma with drugs and alcohol.

On the one hand, youth out there have little fishing rods and pails saying “Spare change for pot and alcohol” and seem to be having a grand time. But beneath that surface of “constant partying” there is a very different reality. It isn’t fun being homeless — it’s lonely and extremely dangerous — and people don’t leave “okay” homes to live on the street because it’s fun. Two plus two is still four.

I want to challenge Jason and everyone considering how they are going to vote on Measure S to throw away this often repeated falsehood about why youth are homeless in Berkeley and that it is a “groovy lifestyle they’ve chosen.” That depiction is utterly untrue.

When you see a youth on the street, imagine, instead of their having a sign that says “Spare change for pot,” if he wore a sign that said, “My stepfather raped me for 10 years straight and I couldn’t take it anymore so I left.” The youth on Berkeley’s streets have faced serious abuse and trauma and badly need help.

— Sally Hindman,
Executive director of Youth Spirit Artworks

Contact the opinion desk at [email protected]

Correction(s):
In a previous version of this letter to the editor, the writer said that according to a 1998 study, 85 percent of Berkeley’s homeless street youth on Telegraph Avenue were victims of either physical abuse or violence. In fact, an estimated 44 percent were victims. The letter also stated that 100 percent of Berkeley’s homeless street youth were experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder. In fact, only 4 out of 27 youth surveyed were found to have had post-traumatic stress disorder.

Comment Policy

Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

Comments

comments

13

Archived Comments (13)

  1. katesisco says:

    After my husband died in a community where we owned two homes and raised our two sons, I became homeless. I would say the cops stole my home but you would think I was mentally ill. Lets say I leaned about being homeless at 45 when all I ever was before was a mother, teacher aide, homemaker, and wife. Notice I was not a drug abuser or alcoholic.

    I just finished reading Hotel Dieu and even thou you are not SF, I imagine SROs are the choice there as well. You cannot keep a pet in a SRO. I spent a year and a half living in my car with my pets in the all night parking lot across from the police station in Gallatin TN. The only people that harassed me were the cops. I had 10 jobs that year and most of the $$ went for gas.

    I applied for SS myself as no atty would rep me. I got ss when I was 60. My husband died 15 years ago in Minocqua WI. A good man with a deep heart was murdered.

    Ms Kathleen Sisco
    510 1st Ave S # 320
    Escanaba MI 49829

  2. life is a party in berkeley and you are almost never alone only when i go to sleep was i alone ditch your house and go urban camping for a while you will see. the problem i had was no private property to wich to take my drugs and boozei cant wait to get back to that party its a little ruff but every thing is free in Berkeley
    i mean everything if you know what your doing
    so hell ya they would choose to live out side as oppossed to following someone living rules mooch better stop hassleing these homless let them do there thing .believe me if they want help they will ask for it later

  3. Stan De San Diego says:

    > When you see a youth on the street, imagine, instead of
    > their having a sign that says “Spare change for pot,” if he
    > wore a sign that said, “My stepfather raped me for 10
    > years straight and I couldn’t take it anymore so I left.”

    So the logical solution to escape from a pervert is to travel to a strange town full of even more perverts?

    Liberal please…

  4. Stan De San Diego says:

    Whether or not they choose to be “homeless” (which most of them do, based on the consequences of their own actions), they choose to come to Berkeley, simply because they know they won’t be forced to accept shelter or treatment because the hand-wringing goo-goos are more worried about their “rights” than the rights of productive and law-abiding citizenry, students, and real tourists (the people who spend money without making pests of themselves).

  5. Berkeleyan says:

    A sign reading “spare change for pot” is still a sign reading “spare change for pot”. We’re voting measure s, which compels people into substance abuse treatment. People like you, dear author, sure as hell aren’t helping the situation.

    And your title “Homeless Youth Are not Always Homeless By Choice in the City of Berkeley” suggests that’s Mr. Willick’s argument, which it isn’t. Failed straw man, buddy.

    • Urban Strider says:

      You are mistaken and ill informed regarding what is and is not helping homeless youth in the streets of Berkeley. You will not be paying the social and financial costs of Measure S. You and supporters of Measure S will pass that onto citizens and business owners. Measure S is absolutely not needed by UCPD or BPD to carry on any draconian policy enforcement to cite or otherwise punish homeless youth. I ask you Berkeleyan when was the last time you observed or investigated all of these so called services that are available to the homeless. How many nights have you spent at YEAH? I look forward to working with you and your ill informed supporters to take a tour of the wonderous services and opportunities that these kids are declining. Service resistant? What a condescending term. How about I’d rather live on the streets rather than be robbed or beaten? The shelters and services that are available are generally managed by overworked underpaid staff that are sometimes overwhelmed by the enormous workload facing them. Mayor Bates touts all of the great funds given to services. It doesn’t matter if the City gives millions to fill a gap that equals twice the need. Best to ya buddy.

      • Berkeleyan says:

        We offer more services than surrounding cities per capita than others, and we’re giving those services to people coming from elsewhere (and by elsewhere I mean as far away as Kansas). Stop shitting on Berkeley, we’re a very generous city and you don’t appreciate us for all that we already do. Peace out.

        Yes on S

        • Urban Strider says:

          Why so inarticulate? As I said… providing 1 million of solution to a 2 million dollar problem is still woefully inadequate… You are shifting the dialogue and focus by reshaping the frame. Shitting on Berkeley??? Is Berkeley your home? If it is you are no more or less important in this community that anyone else. I suspect that I have contributed more positive work to this community over a period of 40 years than you have in your lifetime, and I am offended that it is in fact you, who exploits our City with ill informed and “me to” style opinions. I look forward to an original and productive thought from you on Measure S and without your knee jerk responses. So… when can we check you into the gracious and abundant homeless services? Seriously… why not embed yourself in the homeless community that you speak so authoritatively on? Check out the services. Why not put in the work with individuals like myself (you know… the people shitting on the City) for real solutions rather than investing in your self interest by providing ill informed opinion? Peace to you as well.

          • Berkeleyan says:

            Nothing knee jerk about my feelings. I’m born and raised here. And if our 2 million dollar problem involves care for people who are “care-resistant” AND not even from around here WHILE our neighboring cities and counties don’t pick up the slack, then the ONUS IS NOT ON US.

            Be “offended” and indignant as you want. I can see I struck a nerve with you. Truth hurts, don’t it?

            Measure S will pass. The city wants it; students, residents, the community.

            Your forty years has obviously made zero difference, by the way.

            Peace. Out.

          • Urban Strider says:

            lol… a nerve… nope. Just continued acknowledgment of your avoidance of the obvious. Born and raised here provides you with what authority and credibility? What have you contributed? Seriously you speak about issues that you really have no real knowledge of and… are comfortable with that. Regarding making a difference. I presume that you’re over 40 and able to speak from personal experience? Or maybe you’re not and instead are preparing yourself for future contributions. In the meantime you speak authoritatively on homelessness and social services as well as municipal oversight. Never reach any farther than you need to for facts or understanding. I am hoping that I can send the bill for Measure S to you and the other supporters if it passes. So again… we do we start your research and engagement in the outstanding services provided by the City of Berkeley on our tab?
            Peace and best to you.

          • Emily Post says:

            That was quite a hostile exchange, but I’m glad that it resulted in the two of you agreeing to meet face to face and actually investigate those services! I’m sure you’ll like one another far better once you learn each other’s names.

        • Stan De San Diego says:

          > We offer more services than surrounding
          > cities per capita than others

          Which is of course why they are here in the first place. Emeryville and Albany don’t offer the same type bum friendly-policies, and the working-class “people of color” over in Oaktown have enough of their own problems that they don’t have a bunch of sympathy left over for a bunch of spoiled white 20-somethings playing down-and-out.

  6. Jeff C. says:

    Wow.

    Thank you for bringing up a hard-to-face reality.