“Generations, like people, have personalities,” wrote the Pew Research Center in an introduction to its detailed 2010 report on the characteristics of young voters, “and Millennials — the American teens and twenty-somethings who are making the passage into adulthood at the start of a new millennium — have begun to forge theirs: confident, self-expressive, liberal, upbeat and open to change.”
Indeed, we are quite liberal — at least for now. We are more racially tolerant, secular and open to alternative lifestyles and family structures than any other generation, according to Pew. We came out in force for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012.
And the fact that we are projected to nearly double as a percentage of eligible voters by 2020 has Democrats buoyant about their political future and Republicans (appropriately) scrambling to become culturally and socially modern. Some commentators have suggested that the rise of the Millennials will contribute to a long-term leftward realignment in American politics.
This may well be accurate. But another reading of the Millennials’ political views is also plausible — one that should be sobering to Democrats still celebrating their 2012 victory. Namely, that Millennials are first and foremost individualists and that our current allegiance to the Democratic Party is merely a product of our libertarian tendencies on cultural issues, not a broad embrace of the liberal vision for the country. There is evidence suggesting that once Millennials achieve our social objectives — when, for example, gay marriage is universally accepted, marijuana is legal and access to birth control is no longer debated — we could move swiftly into the Republican camp.
For example, Millennials are somewhat less likely than members of any other generation to say that the government favors the rich, according to a 2011 Pew study. And on entitlement spending, arguably the most important budgetary issue the government will need to grapple with in the coming years and decades, Millennials are also quite conservative.
A whopping 86 percent of us support some degree of privatization of social security. This is striking when you consider the ease with which Democrats massacred President Bush’s 2005 social security privatization proposal. In the same vein, Millennials are more likely than members of any other generation to prioritize low taxes and deficit reduction over preserving benefits. And 74 percent of Millennials told Pew they support “changing Medicare so people can use benefits toward purchasing private health insurance” — the essence of Paul Ryan’s failed Medicare plan, which Democrats successfully painted as extreme.
Some of the Millennials’ apparent indifference toward strong social insurance programs can probably be explained by the illusion of invincibility that tends to accompany youth. But there is also, I think, a cultural reason — an underlying sense of individualism and that is unique to my generation.
Psychologist Jean Twenge, the lead author of a study on the behavior and character traits of Millennials published earlier this year, told The Chronicle of Higher Education that Millennials have been raised to place “more focus on the self and less focus on the group, society and community.” This culture, she said, “emphasizes individualism, and this gets reflected in personality traits and attitudes.” Among other things, Twenge’s study found that in 1971, college students placed financial success at No. 8 on their list of priorities, but that it has consistently topped the list since 1989.
We also think quite highly of ourselves. As New York Times columnist David Brooks has pointed out, “College students today are much more likely to agree with statements such as ‘I am easy to like’ than college students 30 years ago. In the 1950s, 12 percent of high school seniors said they were a ‘very important person.’ By the ’90s, 80 percent said they believed that they were.”
In other words, the data don’t suggest a generation that should be naturally sympathetic to a progressive, communitarian economic message. I hope I’m wrong, but I doubt the Democrats’ rallying cry that “we are all in this together” will resonate with self-assured, independent Millennials in the long-term.
None of this is to say that the Democrats’ advantage with Millennial voters is limited exclusively to social issues. Millennials are more environmentally friendly, more supportive of school funding and more open to cuts in military spending than older voters.
Nevertheless, it is quite likely that once the Republicans drop their 1950s social sensibilities, many Millennials will be won over by the party’s message of economic individualism. So Democrats, I hate to say this, but don’t count on us.
Contact Jason Willick at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter: @jawillick.
Comment Policy
Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regard to the readers, writers and contributors of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Click here to read the full comment policy.

I actually agree with this article. Wow. Willick actually writes something I agree with.
well researched article and provocative thoughts. While I don’t necessarily agree, this is a great Daily Cal article, refreshing.
Wow, Jason, you must be a closet Republican to post this rubbish.
And you must assume Cal’s students are all Democrat automatons.
Most of us are principled, compassionate Democrats who don’t like Republican obstructionism, racism, homophobia, etc.
I am a black conservative. A Republican at that. It is funny that when label an entire party with such terms as racism, homophobia you reveal your own.
Jason did a great job. I predict that as the aging Baby Boomers extract more and more out of Millenials’ paychecks they will vote for more stingy politicians.
Time will always be a large factor in how people vote. Historically, teens and younger voters move to the conservative side as they get older. The youth of 1970 were pretty liberal in their ideas, but by 1980 they were voting in Reagan and living conservative lives that no one would have expected ten years earlier. By 2020, this group of young voters will be part of the working population, and they will be raising families. Their voting priorities will be very different at that time.
No, we will remain liberal. You conservatives are just hoping you get more votes, which won’t happen because now there are more minorities and fewer whites. Minorities vote overwhelmingly for Democrats.
Minorities in trouble vote for Democrats. Once minorities as a population have better lives, then they will vote conservative also. Latinos and blacks in the US already are very conservative when it comes to many social issues. They only vote Democratic now because Republicans do not support economic and immigration policies that minorities often support. In time, minorities will break the cultural and racial chains that keep them from the educational and economic success of whites and Asians. Once that happens, they will vote conservative, because they will have the freedom. In the long run, liberalism will lose out, because everyone will have similar chances.
“Minorities in trouble vote for Democrats.”
In your dreams. Asians voted overwhelmingly for Obama this year. I don’t you’d call them “troubled.”
Troubled doesn’t just mean economic trouble. Asians and Jews are two highly educated and successful groups who buck the economically expected idea that they should vote more conservative. Both groups tend to still vote Democrat, because they still look at themselves as minorities, and that the Democratic party is the party for minorities. The Asian population in the US has grown by about 50% over the last decade, so they are also mindful about which party supports immigration. Jews continue to face discrimination, and the government was much more tolerant than private business when it came to hiring discriminated groups like Jews. Both reasons would cause Jewish voters to also lean toward voting Democrat.
LOL. Thank you for citing your sources this time.
Lest you be accused of plagiarism or self-plagiarism or whatever else academic misstep you can fall afoul of.
You can never be too careful when people hate your ideas and want to slander you.