Students, workers demand community benefits agreement for Richmond Bay Campus

Daria Andrews/Staff

Related Posts

More than 40 students and workers marched to California Hall on Friday to demand that Chancellor Nicholas Dirks grant more protections for Richmond workers related to the development of the Richmond Bay Campus.

Students called upon Dirks to sign a community benefits agreement — a legally binding agreement between a developer and the surrounding community — that would guarantee resources such as affordable housing and health benefits and prevent jobs from being outsourced. The Richmond campus is a collaboration between UC Berkeley and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to expand its research facilities.

At 2 p.m., students from UC Berkeley and other UC campuses gathered on Sproul Plaza alongside workers from the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 3299, the largest UC workers’ union.

Chanting slogans such as “For people over profit,” the protesters berated UC Berkeley for allegedly invading the Richmond community and expressed concerns that the development would lead to gentrification. The protest was held in conjunction with the second annual Student Labor Organizing Conference.

“The fact that the UC is coming to Richmond is not only a great benefit and a great opportunity, but it is also a great threat,” said Melvin Willis, a speaker at the protest and a Richmond activist.

At California Hall, protesters taped letters to doors calling on Dirks to “respect Richmond and its residents.” The letters were taken down that afternoon by a campus employee with the promise that they would be delivered to Dirks’ executive assistant.

Priscilla Ibrahim, a UC Berkeley sophomore and AFSCME 3299 intern, said a major community priority is more educational opportunities. She called for the Richmond campus to provide high school internships so that a student might work there, “not as a custodian but as a chemist.”

Campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof said because planning for the research campus is so preliminary, specific community agreements haven’t been created. Dirks established a community working group in September that includes labor, school and city representatives that is exploring different models of helping Richmond benefit from the campus.

“We’re completely committed to ensuring that whatever we do at the site benefits the community to the maximum extent possible before, during and after construction is completed,” Mogulof said.

The proposed 134-acre site, currently housing the Richmond Field Station, was selected in 2012 as the location of the Berkeley lab’s second campus.

In April, Dirks and Berkeley Lab Director Paul Alivisatos signed a joint statement of commitment to a community partnership, and the UC Board of Regents approved the project’s Long Range Development Plan and environmental impact report in May.

At the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate’s meeting on Wednesday, Dirks plans to unveil his vision for the campus’s development.

The ASUC Senate expressed support for the research campus contingent on the establishment of a community benefits agreement at its meeting Wednesday.

CalSERVE-Cooperative Movement Senator Austin Pritzkat, who helped organize the protest, said the people of Richmond should be treated with dignity.

“The university should make a commitment to ensure that it doesn’t displace the community in Richmond, that it helps serve the community and that it benefits the people living there,” Pritzkat said.

Katy Abbott covers crime and courts. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @katyeabbott.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Willliam Wallace

    The “Richmond Campus” is a toxic waste dump nestled between toxic waste dumps, PCBs on one side, pesticides and acids on the other. Mercury and heavy metals all over. It’s safe if you don’t breathe or touch the soil or water! You can look it all up yourself on the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Geotracker website/ which links to the Department of Toxic Substance Control (CAL-EPA) Envirostor website.


  • dr_doodle

    Uhhh … Speechless here. I mean, I know UCB is a large community so it’s quite possible for their to be 40 misguided union-addled numbskulls, but does this story really need to treat them as any more than that?

    UCB is “invading” Richmond? Aside from the needlessly inflammatory verb choice, it might bear mentioning that the land is question has been owned and operated by UCB for decades. And that the City of Richmond went on an all-out campaign to win the Richmond Bay Campus, with much celebrating when the decision was made. Or that the residents of Richmond are CRYING and BEGGING for economic development and job creation.

  • Wendy Villalobos

    Great to see that not ALL Cal students and ASUC folk are ignorant and selfish. I hope Dirks will actually listen this time and not give round abouts. Keep up the great work <3 GO BEARS

  • Alex

    “the protesters berated UC Berkeley for allegedly invading the Richmond community and expressed concerns that the development would lead to gentrification.”

    The University is now an invading force, ha, what idiots these labor loons are.