State Senate considers bill that would require CA public universities to offer abortion pill

pill_mitzi_perez_file
Mitzi Perez/File

Related Posts

A Senate bill that would require California public college campuses to provide medication abortion services to students was introduced Friday.

Senate Bill 320, authored by Sen. Connie Leyva, D-Chino, would require on-campus student health insurance plans offered by California State University, the California Community Colleges and the University of California to include coverage of the abortion pill, which can be taken up to 10 weeks after a woman’s last period. The bill would not cover surgical abortions.

“I want to make sure women have access to these services — that they have a choice of whether they want to terminate their pregnancy,” Leyva said. “It should happen on campus so they don’t have to travel off campus, which could be a great expense and could make a hard situation more stressful.”

Campus junior Adiba Khan and alumna Meghan Warner spearheaded a movement at UC Berkeley through their organization, Students United for Reproductive Justice, or SURJ, in October 2015. The movement called for the Tang Center to provide medication abortions as part of the Student Health Insurance Plan, or SHIP.

Khan said SURJ hoped to improve reproductive healthcare access for students after discovering that two friends, who were both on SHIP, sought abortion services at the Tang Center and allegedly faced “bureaucratic hurdles.”

“You have to do mandatory counseling,” Khan said. “You basically have to disclose to more people that you want an abortion. … It’s so stigmatized.”

Although the Tang Center does offer a list of providers in the community for abortion services, such as Planned Parenthood in El Cerrito, Khan and Warner were concerned about the financial and academic burden this would put on students.

Khan and Warner authored an ASUC resolution that proposed implementing medication abortions at the Tang Center. Although the resolution passed in spring 2016, it didn’t get approved by the campus administration and wasn’t implemented by the Tang Center, according to Warner. She added, however, that because of their efforts, the current SHIP no longer has the $300 deductible for out-of-network procedures.

The Women’s Foundation of California, inspired by the ASUC resolution, brought the bill idea to Leyva’s attention, but Leyva only discovered that the bill was inspired by the ASUC resolution once she had started authoring SB 320.

“(SB 320) was something that has been in the works for some time,” Leyva said. “It’s just a coincidence that it’s around the same time (as the ASUC bill).”

University Health Services spokesperson Kim LaPean said in an email that the Tang Center fully supports a woman’s right to choose and that the center continues to engage in discussions with students about their concerns regarding abortion services. She added that only the UC Office of the President could comment on the bill, as it is a systemwide bill that includes other universities.

According to UC spokesperson Ricardo Vazquez, the university is still in the process of reviewing SB 320 and has not yet taken a position on it.

Pieter Sittler, internal vice president for Berkeley College Republicans, said in an email that he believed that a decision like this is best decided on the state level. He added that if California legislators and citizens feel this is appropriate, then it should be put into law, but that other states, such as Arkansas, may have a different stance.

The bill has been referred to the education and health committees and has to be out of both committees by April, according to Leyva. If passed in these committees, the bill will go to appropriations for cost analysis before being voted on on the Senate floor. Levya stated that the bill is still in an early stage of the process, but it could reach the governor’s desk by September.

“One of the excellent things about this statewide bill is that when we were advocating for medication abortion at Tang, one of the main concerns was that if Berkeley (were) the first to provide this service, it would create a ton of opposition from anti-abortion, pro-life groups,” said ASUC Senator Marandah Field-Elliot, who was also part of SURJ and contributed to the ASUC resolution with Warner and Khan. “If the bill passes, the impact will be dissipated through all institutes of higher education and will improve access all over California.”

Both Field-Elliot and Khan said that SURJ is planning on holding a rally April 7 on Sproul Plaza about noon to garner support for the bill.

Contact Carina Zhao at [email protected].

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Patty Harden

    Just when i thought things couldnt get any more f&;#ed up talk about stepping all over the conscience of the taxpayer

  • Grandpa Dino

    Terrible idea.

  • lspanker

    Why is this the business of the educational system? One more examples of how the lefties haven’t figured out yet why they lost the last election.