Federally funded research critical to solve problems

Dear Daily Cal,

Your article on the potential impact of the budget cuts proposed by President Donald Trump on research at UC Berkeley did an outstanding job in describing the role of federal research dollars on campus. As noted, the budget proposed by President Trump contains significant cuts to critical agencies that fund basic research, including the National Institutes of Health, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and clean energy programs within the Department of Energy. Not only do these funds support the research efforts of individual students, they also serve to help us fulfill the broader missions of the university.

Though it is the charge of Congress to pass the budget, most federally sponsored research is through the executive branch. Trump’s budget proposal strongly indicates that the current administration does not think that the federal government should invest in scientific research.  The fact that the president’s cabinet contains at least three members — Scott Pruitt, the EPA director, Rick Perry, the energy secretary, and Rex Tillerson, the secretary of state – who question the science behind climate change, does not indicate that this philosophy will readily change.

The concern goes beyond budgets and scientific research. As noted in a recent New York Times op-ed by Harald Varmus, Nobel laureate and former director of the National Institutes of Health and of the National Cancer Institute, This is not about Republicans versus Democrats … It is about a conception of national leadership that connects our economic success and our security to the generation of knowledge and to the arts and sciences, not just to our military strength.” It is for this reason that the impact of the administration’s policies on the UC Berkeley community has already been profound. It has disillusioned many in our research community — the faculty in my department, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in my lab, the undergraduates in my classes, and the staff who support these education and research efforts.   

What to do? One clear imperative is to speak up. To this end, I encourage all of you — students, faculty and staff — to participate in the March for Science this Saturday.  Furthermore, I encourage you to add your voice by signing a recent declaration at academic-values.org. This declaration calls on everyone associated with U.S. colleges to reaffirm the value of scientific knowledge, of reasoned debate and of cultural diversity and inclusion. As noted by professor E.J. Chichilnisky, the Stanford professor behind this effort, “These ideals are central to the academic mission of research and education — a mission that has empowered individual advancement and societal progress in America, and has attracted talented individuals from around the world seeking and building a better future.”

Federally funded basic research is critical for identifying and solving society’s problems. If we want to continue to advance as a society we need to continue to advance in science.

— Dr. Marla Feller, head of the division of neurobiology in the department of molecular and cell Biology and member of the executive committee of the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • flashsteve

    The way the protesters and media have framed the ‘defunding of scientific research’ controversy is just laughable. Trump has never proposed wholesale defunding. He has proposed cuts. His intent is to fund research that is worthwhile. Now, it is difficult to know what research is cost-effective ahead of time, but we need to look at how every Federal dollar is spent. You all know that there is research being done at CAL which is purely vanity work. If students want their tuition to go down, the first place to look is at all the high salaries devoted to research (Federally funded), with little or no teaching involved.

  • Stan Morgan

    So a bunch of bureaucrats who vote against the taxpayer every chance they get are afraid the gravy train’s gravy will dry up?

    Oh, cry me a river.

    Highest poverty rate in the nation.

    An effective Corp tax rate of 50 percent.

    Sky high energy bills and gas taxes.

    And conservative speakers very lives are in peril if they speak their minds in public.

    What is abundantly clear is the disdain California’s bureaucracy holds for the taxpayers who paid for and built the formerly great state of California.

    As they say a Liberal will choose destructive over productive and evil over good every chance they get.

    • SecludedCompoundTTYS

      Why are liberals so blind to the other side. Is it because its an ideology more than anything? I cannot find a liberal to debate me with facts on any topic except ones we agree on. If I state the facts they do not like, they will not acknowledge them. It is so strange and bizarre, its true indoctrination.

Tags No tags yet