‘An impossible situation’: Cal Athletics gets $20M bailout from chancellor’s office

Ana Isabel Diaz/Staff

Related Posts

For the second year in a row, Cal Athletics will receive a bailout from the chancellor’s office to close its deficit, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of the department.

Facing an anticipated budget shortfall of $16 million in Cal Athletics, former chancellor Nicholas Dirks authorized spending up to $20 million to close its deficit for fiscal year 2017, according to campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof. This bailout was in accordance with campus policy requiring the clearing of deficits, Mogulof said in an email.

Cal Athletics also received a different $22.9 million bailout from the chancellor’s office in the previous fiscal year to resolve a similar shortfall, according to Cal Athletics financial statements. In both cases, the chancellor’s funding came from unrestricted investment income and does not include state support or student fees, according to Mogulof.

If it uses all of the funds available from the chancellor’s office, Cal Athletics will have received about $100 million in bailouts, subsidies and annual student fees since fiscal year 2010, according to calculations by The Daily Californian.

As Chancellor Carol Christ attempts to close the $110 million campuswide deficit, Cal Athletics’ sustainability in its current form at UC Berkeley has come into question.

“You couldn’t simultaneously balance the athletic department budget, have athletics solely responsible for the debt on California Memorial Stadium and maintain our current sports program,” Christ said in a recent interview with the Daily Cal editorial board.

“You just can’t do it — the numbers don’t work.”

Major cuts to Cal Athletics could be on the way in the coming months. Teams might be removed, rosters may be reduced and Edwards Stadium could be turned into housing.

Athletic director Mike Williams did not respond to a request for comment as of press time.

‘Crippling’ debt

Cal Athletics has seen its deficit soar in recent years, as it faces huge interest payments from debt incurred by the 2012 renovation of California Memorial Stadium and construction of an athletics complex. In fiscal year 2016, the department had a deficit about $22 million — almost triple the $8.5 million deficit the year before.


According to a department financial report, Cal Athletics expects to pay about $18 million annually in interest until 2032, when the principal of the debt kicks in. Payments will then jump to more than $25 million per year and gradually inch close to $40 million. For reference, the total revenue for Cal Athletics in the 2016 fiscal year was about $86 million.

In total, Cal Athletics holds more than $400 million in debt, the most of any athletic department in the country, almost entirely from the renovation and seismic retrofitting of the stadium and construction of its athletics complex. Bloomberg News has called the debt “crippling.” Deadspin ran a piece this summer with the headline, “Cal Is Fucked Because Of Its Stupid Stadium Deal.”

When California Memorial Stadium and its athletic center were developed, many questioned the department’s plan to pay for the stadium, a major part of which was the sale of expensive “premium” seats to Cal football games. The plan was called “risky” at the time by the Mercury News.

While early numbers were positive, they have declined in recent years. As of June 30, 2016, 1,814 “full season equivalents” of these seats were sold. That’s down from 2,225 in December 2013.

“They went to the roulette wheel and they lost,” said Roger Noll, an economics professor emeritus at Stanford University and expert on stadium financing.

“The hole they’re buried in is not one that can be fixed.”

Overall football ticket sales have dropped too. For its marquee home rivalry game against the touted USC team this year, a then-undefeated Cal team saw only 46,747 in the stadium, about 74 percent of capacity. In the 2009 season, before the stadium was renovated, Cal averaged a home attendance of just under 60,000. Last season, that number was 46,628.

But the budget woes of Cal Athletics don’t end at football.

‘An impossible situation’

Men’s basketball, generally considered a money-making sport in college athletics, lost money at Cal in fiscal year 2016 even though the team made the NCAA tournament. Cal women’s basketball lost just under $3 million that same year after losing $2 million the year before that, according to department financial statements.

In 2007, former chancellor Robert Birgeneau forgave $31 million of Cal Athletics’ debt owed to the campus.

In 2007, former chancellor Robert Birgeneau forgave $31 million of Cal Athletics’ debt owed to the campus. Karen Ling/File.

While those programs might catch the most media attention, the sheer number of sports Cal offers, 30, has also been cited as a drag on the department’s budget. Cal has one of the largest sports offerings in the Pac-12 Conference.

“It’s an impossible situation,” said Michael O’Hare, campus professor of public policy. “There’s just no stable state for us to have 30 teams at that cost, and it’s going to get worse.”

Even in years, such as fiscal year 2011, when the department ostensibly ran a surplus, Cal Athletics received millions from the campus in the form of a regular yearly subsidy. Since fiscal year 2010, Cal Athletics has received an estimated $47 million in subsidies directly from campus, not including bailouts. In that same time span, the department took in $12 million from fees assessed on the student body.

But the bailouts of the last two years are not the first time Cal Athletics has needed campus help to resolve its financial woes. Then-chancellor Robert Birgeneau forgave $31 million of Cal Athletics’ debt owed to the campus in 2007, and the chancellor before him, Robert Berdahl, did the same with another chunk of Cal Athletics’ debt in 1999.

With revenues uncertain and debt payments rising, many experts have painted a bleak future for Cal Athletics.

“There are really no other options. You owe the debt. No matter what you do, the debt is going to be there,” Noll said, adding that he expects Cal Athletics to have large deficits long into the future.

In June, the Chancellor’s Task Force on Intercollegiate Athletics concluded that Cal Athletics’ deficit, as well as the campus’s deficit, was not sustainable. Although Christ seeks to balance athletics’ deficit by 2020, the task force said that was unlikely.

“Given its magnitude, it is virtually certain that interest expense will exceed (Cal Athletics’) operating income for the foreseeable future no matter what actions are taken regarding program scope in (Cal Athletics),” the task force said in its report.

Despite new deals with Under Armour and Learfield and departmental staffing cuts, Cal Athletics anticipates a deficit of about $15 million for the 2018 fiscal year, according to Mogulof — which, as per campus policy, Mogulof said would require deficit relief from the chancellor’s office.

Austin Weinstein covers academics and administration. Contact him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter at @austwein.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Gibarian

    Given the time they took out the debt, did they also execute a swap deal and have counterparty risk?

    Newsflash: jocks really are bad at math.

  • C Bierbauer78

    Twenty million taxpayer dollars, twenty million taxpayer dollars there, and pretty soon you are talking real money.

  • dwss5

    Article title:
    ‘ “An impossible situation”: Cal Athletics gets $20M bailout from chancellor’s office’

    Apparently, CBS San Francisco has picked up this story as well in Friday’s news item ‘Memorial Stadium Renovation Cost Puts Cal Athletics Budget In Jeopardy’ http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/10/20/memorial-stadium-renovation-cost-puts-cal-athletics-budget-in-jeopardy/
    First paragraph of the CBS SF story:
    BERKELEY (KPIX 5) — The $400 million price tag for renovating UC
    Berkeley’s Memorial Stadium could end up leading to cuts to Cal Sports,
    bleeding the athletics department dry and plunging into crippling debt.

  • C Bierbauer78

    ‘Cal Athletics will have received about $100 million in bailouts, subsidies and annual student fees since fiscal year 2010’

    This ia a blatant waste of taxpayer dollars. Terminate all intercollegiate sports. Intermural sports can teach all the sportsmanship and teamwork that the money wasting current athletic program provides and ar reasonable cost to the taxpayer.

  • Liz Estrada

    Makes no sense that whole departments are being considered for elimination and $20 million is going to service a debt for the Athletic Department. Yet another horrible decision made by administrators that ends up punishing people engaged in actual scholarship.

  • what a waste of money

  • William M Popper

    …works out to around $325,742.29 per California touchdown since stadium remodel…

  • Disqusted

    Football über alles has been the downfall of many stadium deals. http://www.theleadsports.com/the-14-worst-taxpayer-funded-stadium-deals-ever/

    You might think that a world class university, with a well regarded business school across the street from the stadium, would have known better, but you would be wrong.

    Stadium neighbors don´t want to be disturbed, so UC can´t even rent out the stadium for concerts or other large events. What the heck were they thinking?

    Maybe they can book some daytime concerts that will not fit at the Greek Theatre.

    • Trulahn

      What neighbors? All of the properties around the stadium belong to the university. We rent out Greek Theater for concerts and it’s practically right next to the stadium.

      • Nunya Beeswax

        Panoramic Hill doesn’t belong to the university. There’s a residential neighborhood back there that has existed since before the stadium was built, and they get screwed every time there’s an event at the stadium because it was built with absolutely no plan for access or parking.

        • Gibarian

          The Stadium was built in the 20’s, so the neighborhood has had enough time to get used to it and move out if so desired. The university has eminent domain powers, so it could just buy up the neighborhood if need be. The relationship is very similar to the Rose Bowl, actually.

          • Nunya Beeswax

            It could certainly buy up the neighborhood, but it wouldn’t come cheap. By the time the court challenges had all gone through (and winning them is anything but a foregone conclusion), they’d have spent more money than it was worth. None of which addresses the stupidity of not only building a stadium smack on a major fault line, with no access or parking plan, but going $400 million into debt in order to improve that stadium. Again, it’s clear that somebody wanted a major project on his resume and small concerns like whether the project was affordable or made any sense were just handwaved.

  • Anonymous

    And for Mr. Mogulof to say that the funds are coming from “unrestricted” monies is inane. Those unrestricted funds could, just as easily, be used on student education.

    • s randall

      “Unrestricted” means that they can legally use those monies on athletics. So you have to read it as, “we aren’t doing anything illegal.”

  • s randall

    Football is in a death spiral. We keep having night games, because we aren’t popular, and that keeps people from buying season tickets and attending, because night games suck.

    Why is our “Homecoming” game with Arizona at 5 PM? I distinctly recall being told that the Pac12 guarantees that homecoming games will start by 3 PM.

  • BerkPed

    Time to say good bye to football, and all other NCAA sports. Time to stop letting the tail wag the dog.

  • Nunya Beeswax

    Cut it loose. Let IA stand or fall on their own income.

    At a time when budgets are being cut everywhere else, it is absolutely unconscionable that this tail continues to wag the dog.

    • Nunya Beeswax

      “If it doesn’t have to do with education, it doesn’t need to be in an institution devoted to learning.” –John Mark Reynolds

  • DQ

    I think the Revenge of the Nerds are in order… Somehow the administration convinced themselves that throwing resources behind brain-damaged ‘Alpha-Betas’ is a better way to provide education than improvements in course offerings, upgrades in research facilities, etc. Me think football causes brain damage even off the field!

  • hoapres

    This is absurd.

    Live within your means is for everybody else.

    • dwss5

      hoapres wrote:
      “Live within your means is for everybody else.”

      Yep, even for Nicholas Dirks and Dan Mogulof.

      As the article explicitly quotes it:
      “Facing an anticipated budget shortfall of $16 million in Cal Athletics, former chancellor Nicholas Dirks authorized spending up to $20 million
      to close its deficit for fiscal year 2017, according to campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof.”

      Gotta wonder what would happen if the Dirks and Modulof co-conspirators were instead urged to spend THEIR OWN DARN MONEY to purportedly “save” Cal Athletics rather than going on their current ~$20 million spending spree using “everybody else’s” money (i.e., that of the greater general Cal budget) ??!!

  • X Ray

    So far, all of this is just service on the debt. In the outer years … not too long from now … those payments will rise to $35 – $40 million. Per year. The only way out of this is are donations encouraged from winning football & basketball programs … and an administration that refuses to conflate Nazism with free speech. As an alum, I refuse to give Cal a single penny as long as they continue their embrace of Nazis.

    The incompetence of this administration in *all* areas is not only shocking, it is sickening.