‘Free speech year’ panel at UC Berkeley talks harm by hate speech

Jenna Wong/Staff

Related Posts

Chancellor Carol Christ hosted a panel Monday on the harm that can come from unrestricted speech.

The event, titled “Beyond the First: Healing and Harmful Speech,” was moderated by Eva Paterson, a UC Berkeley alumna and co-founder and president of the Equal Justice Society. The panel included professors with backgrounds in psychology, linguistics, law and ethnic studies who discussed the impact of harmful speech on physiological, psychological and emotional levels.

Sharon Inkelas, special faculty adviser to the chancellor on sexual violence and sexual harassment, worked with Vice Chancellor for Equity and Inclusion Oscar Dubón, Jr. to coordinate the event. The event was the second in a series of faculty forums in what Christ has called a “free speech year.” Christ said in her opening remarks that the second panel’s theme was chosen after audience members and panelists at the first panel brought up “injury” and “harm” in relation to free speech.

Both panels come at a time of several free-speech-related controversies at UC Berkeley. “Free Speech Week,” a joint effort between campus publication the Berkeley Patriot and controversial writer Milo Yiannopoulos, was set to take place on campus in September until its cancelation. Conservative writer Ben Shapiro’s campus talk Sept. 14 drew about a thousand protesters.

“The ‘free speech’ events of this past fall had a big impact on the community, especially among groups and individuals with a past personal or cultural history of oppression,” Inkelas said in an email. “The goal of this panel was not only to characterize that negative impact through scholarship and empathy but also to suggest helpful responses to harmful speech, and healing mechanisms.”

Panelists went into detail about the tangible impact of slurs, discrimination and hate speech. Victoria Plaut, a panelist and campus professor of law and social science, said exposure to hate speech can have a variety of effects on the victim, from feelings of exclusion to existential pain, hopelessness and dehumanization. Panelist Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton, a campus psychology professor, said oppressed groups often face uncertainty regarding how and when they will face discrimination, which leads to increased and chronic stress.

“Hateful speech and speech acts … always exceed the immediate context,” said panelist Lok Siu, an associate professor of ethnic studies, during the event. “They conjure and evoke personal memories and collective histories.”

Each panelist provided insight on healthy ways to address the negative impacts of “harmful speech.” Suggested techniques ranged from engaging in critical self-care — including eating ice cream, according to Paterson, Mendoza-Denton and Siu — to talking openly about the issues, protesting and rallying.

“If whatever you are doing is leading you to feel helpless, (it’s) time to do something else,” said panelist Robert Levenson, a campus psychology professor. “I started feeling better about myself when I was out yelling and organizing and marching.”

Several audience members and panelists raised questions about the role of the institution in combating harmful speech. Plaut said during the panel that ensuring “culturally responsive counseling and mental health services” and connecting campus community members around these issues are important steps for institutions like UC Berkeley.

“(Discussing these issues) is important, just for having people go through their day-to-day lives,” said Basil Kyriacou, a campus sophomore who attended the event. “If it helps one or two people make sense of everything, I think it’s worth it.”

Contact Olivia Nouriani at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @olivianouriani.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • California Defender

    A “free speech” panel that only discusses and validates extreme left-wing ideology?

    Sounds more like an echo chamber. But based on the number of empty seats, nobody heard the echos that recommended “engaging in critical self-care — including eating ice cream.”

    Good thing nobody heard the Berkeley professor who suggested that after eating ice cream “I started feeling better about myself when I was out yelling and organizing and marching.”

    As they say in Berkeley, rocky road ice cream is best with a drizzle of hate on top.

  • Killer Marmot

    Chancellor Carol Christ hosted a panel Monday on the harm that can come from unrestricted speech.

    Whatever the harm done by unrestricted speech, it is vastly superseded by the harm done by restricting speech.

    The ability to say what must not be said is our greatest defense against oppression. Don’t cripple it because you figure you know what’s correct and incorrect, and therefore you know what should be said and what should not be said. None of us are that smart.

  • lspanker

    Another group of freaking crybabies who can’t handle the fact that people have the right to express views and opinions they don’t like,,,