Millions of dead trees in California could spark massive wildfires, UC Berkeley study shows

trees_scott-l-stephens_courtesy
Scott L. Stephens/Courtesy

Related Posts

Fire experts, including two UC Berkeley researchers, published a study Wednesday that found that the 100 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada could potentially increase the risk of mass fires in the next decade.

The accumulation of dead trees creates a massive reserve of fuel for wildfires. The study, which was published in the journal BioScience, discusses the use of forest management methods, including mechanical thinning and prescribed fires, as fire prevention techniques to reduce tree density in forests and disrupt the conditions that fuel mass fires.

“I hope (the study) might give further information into the idea of just trying to address the overarching problem proactively,” said campus professor of fire science Scott Stephens, who co-authored the study.

Stephens said dense tree populations, coupled with the current drought, create problems for individual trees, including competition for water and other resources. When these overpopulated forests die, they become conducive to wildfires.

The study refers to prescribed burning and mechanical thinning as a few methods to remove dead biomass as a fuel source for high-intensity fires. This is achieved by removing or burning the smaller trees in a forest.

According to study co-author Brandon Collins, a researcher at the UC Center for Fire Research and Outreach, these methods aid in preventing connectivity, a forest condition that fuels rapid and massive wildfires, between the dead trees. Large, open spaces between individual trees are critical for inhibiting the rapid spread of wildfires in forests, Collins said.

Bill Stewart, co-director of the campus Center for Forestry, said management techniques such as prescribed fires and mechanical thinning, or “logging,” have been the source of public controversy.

Uninhabited spaces between individual trees are necessary, however, in order to build up the resilience of forests, Stewart said.

Implementing low-density conditions in forests — that is, maintaining large, open spaces between individual trees — is an important aspect of fire management, Collins said. Low-density conditions prevent fires from spreading rapidly through forests, according to Collins.

Collins described the common suppression method of extinguishing wildfires as they occur as “chasing catastrophes.”

“We’re just kind of chasing fires,” Collins said. “The real concern is that we’re not getting ahead of anything. We haven’t managed the forest yet. … We need to see that these fires are driven by mismanagement.”

The vast majority of forests that haven’t been burned or been affected by the drought are densely packed, Stephens said, and are therefore vulnerable to mass fire conditions.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or CAL FIRE, has employed prescribed fires to decrease these conditions, according to CAL FIRE spokesperson Heather Williams. In 2017, more than 17,000 acres were treated with prescribed fires, Williams said.

“With the research, we’re really glad to see that they’re supporting the method CAL FIRE (and) our partners are using,” Williams said.

Williams said that CAL FIRE has increased year-round staffing, allowing the organization to employ more fire-prevention work.

“I do think that there’s hope,” said Stephens. “Sometimes people look at the big events … and it feels like inevitably climate change is going to cause havoc. But there is hope. There are some things you can do today that will make the forests more resilient. So I am hopeful for those transformations.”

Adrianna Buenviaje covers research and ideas. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @adriannaDC.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • John J. Mulhall

    Everybody but the permanently ignorant and their political ilk knows this. LA and So Cal have to re-learn it every 5 years (give or take) when their canyons and hills burn up because they don’t keep the underbrush down. They don’t learn from the fires in the Sierras every few years, and they don’t learn from other’s massive fires (I allude to Washington State and what became the “Tripod Fire” less than 10 years ago when they had a 5-year ‘heads up’ with beetles in the trees [that died and burnt] ).

  • Linda D Newman

    Imagine that, logging is actually beneficial… too bad they are discovering that after so many sawmills were closed down

  • D.Plorable

    We could put a lot of people to work doing the thinning-out that needs to be done. Perfect for the most difficult-to-employ, lower-skilled parts of the labor economy, such as parolees, ex-offenders in general, and the drop-out/flunk-out young adults (mostly male) that the state has a surplus of, persistent in the middle of what we are told is a low-unemployment job market.

    But Sacramento has other priorities. And the greener-than-thou lobby files hailstorms of lawsuits to stop any logging, even to salvage usable timber after the trees already burned.

    We used non-violent inmates to fight fires once they start, we could use a lot more to prevent them.

    Interesting case study here:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rim_Fire

    The debate continues
    https://www.npr.org/2014/08/18/341391128/one-year-after-calif-rim-fire-debate-simmers-over-forest-recovery