Berkeley STILL hasn’t sanctioned homeless encampments. Why?

CITY AFFAIRS: Mayor Jesse Arreguín campaigned on helping the homeless community, but he has yet to live up to his campaign promises

quotecard_homelessness

When Jesse Arreguín was just a candidate in Berkeley’s 2016 mayoral election, his campaign revolved around fixing the housing and homelessness crises. But a year after being elected, Arreguín still hasn’t followed through on many of his promises to the homeless community.

At a homelessness forum hosted by Councilmember Kate Harrison on Monday, Arreguín said he wants to ensure that the city “has the ability to remove an encampment at their discretion” with a 72-hour notice, if public safety concerns arise. The proposed policy — which Arreguín called in a recent interview with The Daily Californian a “good neighbor policy” — would ostensibly allow encampment residents to stay as long as they address the health or safety concerns brought forward by city code enforcement officers within the three-day period.

The proposed policy is well-intentioned, and the number of city-initiated encampment removals has certainly decreased in recent months. It is encouraging to see a more concerted effort to decriminalize homelessness in Berkeley. But just Thursday, another encampment was disbanded by the city — and this is to say nothing of recent BART raids.

The draft language doesn’t seem sensitive to the realities of homeless people — for instance, there’s nothing to stop a code enforcement officer from determining that somebody’s belongings are an “accumulation of trash.”

The policy is still in the early stages of development, but it diverges from Arreguín’s campaign promises of authorized camping on designated private property. In a recent interview, Arreguín affirmed that “if there are encampments and they aren’t creating significant impacts, they should be allowed to exist.”

But that’s not happening now. A 72-hour notice doesn’t make ultimately disbanding homeless encampments more acceptable, and it certainly doesn’t solve homelessness. Neither does enforcing subjective neighborhood standards.

“I’m of the personal opinion that if the city were to sanction encampments, it’s got to be supervised,” Arreguín said. “You have to provide restrooms and garbage (collection), or there may be sanitation issues.”

Great idea, Mr. Mayor. Indeed, let’s do this.

Arreguín and the rest of City Council have shown that they know how the city should act in regards to homelessness. But still only one encampment has a portable restroom nearby, and there’s no city-sanctioned permanent encampment. And with so much of the council on the same page, excuses ring like hollow politics. The city’s been waiting too long for pragmatic changes to homelessness policy.

The Berkeley community is waiting for Arreguín to be the mayor that he campaigned to be. So where is he?

Editorials represent the majority opinion of the Editorial Board as written by the opinion editor.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • Princess Swan

    As someone who was once part of that movement they want the easy way of things. They want to be lawless and want to remain lazy. While there I witnessed multiple incidents of violence, drug use, and public intoxication. They want a place where they can do drugs and be free to keep the area unhealthy. Once I finally got smart and left I got myself off the street and did better with my life. End the free ride and arrest every one there.

  • Marcia Poole

    I agree with this. All we have to do is witness last Thursday’s raid on the encampments in front of old city hall. Mike Zint, leader of First They Came For The Homeless, has disputed the city’s published statements on what happened and the raids that followed. Jesse has not. Please read Mike’s statement:

    “This is intended to stop the lies, and show the truth. This is what happened. Our community had nothing to do with the fire. Our
    community was not on the landing, or north of the bulletin board. We were on the south side of the bulletin board, and on the south side of the building.

    The first fire occurred in early January. Below is a quote from a berkeleyside article, and link to the article. It was made by a local resident. It is clearly stated this person had nothing to do with us. There was no resulting raid, because the truth was published and known to the community.

    Neighborhood resident Kim Aronson, who alerted Berkeleyside about the fire, said the man whose home burned moved onto the property several months ago, several weeks prior to the creation of a large homeless protest camp outside Old City Hall. Aronson said the man had lived inside a bush, which he had built out with boxes and a number of other items.

    http://www.berkeleyside.com/
    2018/01/11/small-fire-man- made-tent-berkeleys-old-city- hall-homeless-camp/

    In the recent article, we see something different. We see a city employee being quoted. This quote puts the blame on us, and groups everyone into the same encampment. This quote, in a news publication, puts everything in motion for removal. The Daily Cal did something similar.

    We’re not sure how it started,” though it looked like some objects from thehomeless encampment on the lawn was involved,” May said. Some members of the “First They Came for the Homeless” political group and homeless encampment have been living at Old City Hall since November, when they were evicted from their
    nearly year-long post at the Berkeley-Oakland border. The group has grown to occupy much of the lawn.

    https://www.berkeleyside.com/
    2018/02/06/berkeley- firefighters-put-small-debris- fire-old-city-hall/

    Below is testimony from Paul Blake. Paul is very well known, and respected in Berkeley. He is known to the city government and reporters from many media outlets. His testimony contains some things that show the city lied. “BFD arrived 12 minutes late to the scene, but is used as a witness. The witness also had no knowledge of the dynamics on the property, yet again is used as a witness. This type of journalism kills homeless people. It sways opinion based
    on lies. And once printed, it is almost impossible for the truth to get out. The damage, in this case, will not be undone easily.”

    “I was the very first person who rushed up the Old City Hall stairs. No one else was there other than myself and the individual who claimed responsibility for the flames. flames were 3-5 ft high. He said it was a candle. He continued down the stairs and rode initially north. I rushed to the fire while calling for a rake to spread the burning material out on the concrete to avoid flames reaching low branches of a tree. While approaching the flames I heard 3 small explosions from fire. At this point a resident from Dare 2 Change Community, an affiliate of FTCFTH, insisted that I stop… and get no closer to the fire. Police and fire arrived on scene with hand extinguishers. I called for any extinguishers on site. FTCFTH brought
    their site extinguisher to Police and Fire who used it to help extinguish flames. Every BPD officer I personally spoke to clearly stated that fire was NOT in FTCFTH group. Resident was NOT affiliated with FTCFTH. Additionally the remark that FTCFTH possessions or material was involved in this blaze is unsubstantiated and not witnessed by me at all. As I was the very first responder and initially the sole witness to this fire I am prepared to respond
    to any other witness cynically suggesting that FTCFTH or Dare 2 Change was in ANY way responsible or a contributor to this incident. I have not read Berkeleyside account, however I can state that I have NOT been contacted by Berkeleyside… any other first responder other than myself… was NOT on the scene. No one else was there with me other than individual who claimed to start the fire. NO ONE other than BPD who knew me had any comments at all. BFD had no questions and in fact arrived a full 12 minutes after I was there. “…implicitly blames FTCFTH for new fire” I do not see it that way… I was there… I was the first one there.”

    The day of the fire, there was a meeting. The mayor’s quote. “Arreguín added that the city would post eviction notices 72 hours in advance and allow encampment residents to attempt to fix their behavioral or health-related issues in order to avoid eviction.”

    http://www.dailycal.org/2018/
    02/06/berkeley-residents- dissatisfied-efforts-combat- homelessness/

    Thursday, at 5 am, the police raided our city hall location. They did it with less than 24 hours notice. They displaced over 40 people. Those displaced were seniors, disabled, and addicts fresh into recovery. They removed months of stability. They put some people into a much worse situation. They destroyed recovery progress, and put some addicts in the impossible position of staying clean on
    the streets. They destroyed a community that was making a difference. First They Came For The Homeless has helped get over 50 people off the streets. With the help of the Dare 2 Change community, we finally had a working solution for getting addicted clean and into our sober community. They graduate from Dare 2
    Change community, and enter into the FTCFTH camp as drug and alcohol free. Once in FTCFTH camp, the new people must go through probation, just like any other new resident. Dare 2 Change has graduated 23 people. In the same period of time, the HUB got two housed out of camp. We have used no tax payer dollars. The HUB has around 1.7 million dollars budgeted.

    When you do the math, we have gotten 50 off the streets.Before the raid, we hadaround 60 sheltered in tents. Including sheltering those 60, we are also providing stability, storage of gear, security, personal space, privacy, and community. With Dare 2 Change’s 23 graduated, that brings us to around 120 people that were not fighting for a mat on the floor. They are no longer in doorways. They are no longer on drugs, wandering around town.

    We are the homeless. We don’t get funded. All we have is an idea on what is needed. We have proven over the last 13 months that this community based solution, with rules and camp consensus policy making, is the best way to save lives, and get people off the streets. The fact that the city would rather spend millions on things that don’t work, than listen to the homeless suggests to me the city has no desire to really help. They would rather chase the homeless, or house them out of town.

    Mike Zint

    First They Came For The Homeless

  • Killer Marmot

    Homeless camps are dangerous and unsanitary, and nobody wants them in their neighborhood.

  • Man with Axe

    It is an unfortunate fact of life that the easier you make it for homeless people the more homeless people you will get. This dimension of the problem must be addressed.

  • That Guy

    Edwards Stadium+ the baseball field+ eucalyptus field could house close to 1,000 in tents.

  • lspanker

    Berkeley STILL hasn’t sanctioned homeless encampments. Why?

    Because it’s a stupid idea, even for Berkeley, that’s why…

  • That Guy

    put them on campus.