Undocumented Student Program’s only attorney was just placed on paid administrative leave

Malini Ramaiyer/File

Related Posts

Prerna Lal — the immigration attorney at UC Berkeley’s Undocumented Student Program, or USP, who was responsible for the release of UC Berkeley student Luis Mora from Border Patrol and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody at the beginning of the year — was placed on paid administrative leave Thursday for unclear reasons.

Lal was placed on leave from the East Bay Community Law Center, or EBCLC, a community-based clinic that provides legal services to low-income clients in Alameda County. Lal recently mobilized around the case of Mora, who was detained by Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“I can solely assure you that Prerna Lal not only is a great lawyer, but an outstanding human being with an out of this world moral character,” Mora said in an email after the announcement that Lal would be put on paid administrative leave.

Lal said they do not know why they were put on administrative leave. They work as the USP’s only attorney, serving hundreds of undocumented students and their families. Last year, amid the uncertainty surrounding President Donald Trump’s repeal of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, Lal worked on 300 cases. At the beginning of this year, Lal’s cases numbered about 100.

Both campus spokesperson Janet Gilmore and USP Director Meng So offered the same statement regarding Lal being placed on paid administrative leave.

“We have been informed by colleagues at East Bay Community Law Center (EBCLC) that the attorney who was responsible for cases related to our undocumented students has been placed on administrative leave,” both So and Gilmore said in their statements. “All cases have been assigned to other attorneys at EBCLC who have a depth of expertise in immigration law.”

EBCLC staff could not be reached for comment.

In the past, Lal has criticized the campus’s commitment, or lack thereof, to serving undocumented students. They previously stated that they were given no office on campus at which to work and meet students. According to Mora, if Lal had secured campus resources, his detainment could have potentially been prevented.

The news of Lal’s placement on administrative leave comes just days after UC Berkeley Chancellor Carol Christ announced plans to allocate $800,000 to undocumented student needs for one semester of the 2018-19 academic year and to create a permanent resource center for undocumented students at the César E. Chávez Student Center.  According to the campus’s “Undocuaction Plan,” these developments are set to happen as soon as next month.

Despite Lal being put on administrative leave, Gilmore and So said they are confident that UC Berkeley students and their interests will continue to be well-served moving forward.

Contact Alyssa Bernardino at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @alybernardino.

Please keep our community civil. Comments should remain on topic and be respectful.
Read our full comment policy
  • jeyhovah

    why did she delete her twitter?

  • taxpayer22

    Legal immigrants take offense to seeing illegal aliens being called, “immigrants.”..

    Honest immigrants earned that title. Illegal Aliens snuck in and they are just that, illegal aliens.

  • taxpayer22

    Americans want massive cuts to legal immigration… 81 percent support Reducing immigrant levels.

  • That Guy

    “They” how many are there?

    • lspanker

      That’s the new pronoun in use by the “we’re confused about our own gender, so everyone else needs to be confused as well” crowd. :O|

      • That Guy

        I don’t care about their gender but “they” is plural.

        • Anirvan

          The singular they has been used in the English language for centuries. Even Shakespeare used it (see A Comedy of Errors, act IV, scene 3, line 2). Just because you don’t know about a specific word usage doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

          • That Guy

            “used to refer to two or more people or things previously mentioned or easily identified.”

          • lspanker

            That usage has grown in popularity over the past decade.

            Only among the gender confused and their advocates/apologists.The rest of us find it quite silly that certain people get their panties in a knot over gender-specific pronouns.

          • Anirvan

            I feel your pain.

            Some people are triggered by new words or usages, and that’s OK.

            You’re welcome to live in your safe space, free of scary new words like “selfie,” “blog,” “binge-watch,” or “crowdfunding.”

            Or if you’re triggered by new definitions for old words, your safe space can also ban “cloud,” “drone,” “catfish,” or “salty.”

            But if you’re triggered by the singular “they,” you might also need to burn books by Shakespeare, Chaucer, Austen, etc. — because they used it as well.

            Good luck with your linguistic safe space!

          • lspanker

            Methinks you’re addressing the wrong person. I’m not triggered by “they”, I merely pointed out how silly it is.