Selective Disservice

Requiring military recruiters to obtain special permits would be an affront to the city's legacy of free expression.

Related Articles »





  • Printer Friendly Printer Friendly
  • Comments Comments (0)

Berkeley of local lore is a haven for ideas that are unwelcome anywhere else. Whatever your beliefs, the story goes, you can pitch them safely here in a place whose name still evokes images of the Free Speech Movement. This city is the place to make an argument­-any argument.

Unless, apparently, you work for the armed forces.

In a ridiculous display of hypocrisy, local activists have moved to place an initiative on the November ballot that would prevent the establishment of military recruitment offices within the city without a special permit.

The Berkeley City Council-not one to be left out of demonizing the military-will for its part consider ordering the city manager to inform recruiters that they are "uninvited intruders." And, lest the activists have trouble finding parking, Councilmembers Linda Maio and Max Anderson have proposed reserving them a spot on busy Shattuck Avenue, free of charge.

Small gestures, the initiative's backers argue, in the effort to protect youth from the influence of recruiters. As cities regulate businesses that sell adult material, so too should Berkeley regulate recruiters.

Leaving aside the base offensiveness of comparing the men and women of the armed services to pornographers, both the initiative's supporters and the council are suffering from an embarrassing case of misdirected anger. Their dispute, whether they realize it or not, is with the Bush administration's military policies-not with offices making a pitch for armed service.

Families strive to protect their children from all manner of perceived threats, from fast food to video games to churches that preach the "wrong" religion. Ultimately, the best protection any community can offer its youth is an education that allows them to make their own sound choices, regardless of the temptations they confront and even when their government is occupied with matters more pressing than shielding their eyes.

So let the activists educate-let them open their own recruitment center, staff it daily, put it next door to the Marines. But the same laws that allow protesters to rally outside the recruiters' door allow that door to remain open. Attempting to simply run recruiters out of town is cowardice and a disgrace to the Berkeley legacy of open debate.






Comments (0) »

Comment Policy
The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regards to both the readers and writers of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. Click here to read the full comment policy.
White space
Left Arrow
Editorials
Image Wilma Chan for State Senate
With two very qualified candidates vying to fill Senate President Pro Tem D...Read More»
Editorials
Image Tony Thurmond for State Assembly
No candidate running for the 14th Assembly District seat is completely unqu...Read More»
Editorials
Image Yes on Measure F
The proposal allows all voters in Alameda County to impose their will on un...Read More»
Editorials
Image No On Prop 98, Yes on Prop 99
While Propositions 98 and 99 protect private property from aggressive gover...Read More»
Right Arrow






Job Postings

White Space