School District Faces Racial Preference Lawsuit

Related Articles »





  • Printer Friendly Printer Friendly
  • Comments Comments (0)

Berkeley Unified School District's race-based admissions policy came under attack yet again on Monday when the Pacific Legal Foundation appealed a 2007 court decision that ruled in favor of the district.

The public interest litigation firm, working on behalf of the American Civil Rights Foundation, filed a lawsuit against the school district in October 2006 for allegedly violating Proposition 209, a 1996 California law that prohibits racial preferences in schools.

But an Alameda County Superior Court judge decided in April that the district's elementary student assignment plan was legal and nondiscriminatory.

Student assignment relies on a diversity number given to the planning area the student lives in, with 445 areas total in the city.

The system is trying to increase diversity in the schools by using race as a factor in determining admissions, along with parent education and income level, said district spokesperson Mark Coplan.

"(The plan) doesn't actually involve going to the individual and saying you fit this profile. It doesn't look at the individual at all-it looks at areas," he said.

The Pacific Legal Foundation believes the district's use of race in student assignment is illegal and harmful, said Alan Foutz, the attorney leading the foundation's appeal.

"They want the racial composition for any particular elementary school to reflect the racial composition of the district as a whole. We believe this constitutes as racial balancing, which the Supreme Court constitutes as unconstitutional," Foutz said.

The district's placement system has already faced two lawsuits in the past four years.

"We've won in two courtrooms against the Pacific Legal Foundation in the past and we are very confident we will win again," Coplan said. "Not only have we won, but other districts are looking at ours because our plan is the plan that works without crossing (Proposition) 209."

The foundation is now requesting that the California Court of Appeals review the Alameda County judge's decision.

Neither the Pacific Legal Foundation nor Berkeley Unified School District said they intend to back down.

"This particular case is grounded solely in California law. We intend to go to California Supreme Court if necessary," Foutz said.

Tags: BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION


Contact Deepti Arora at darora@dailycal.org.



Comments (0) »

Comment Policy
The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regards to both the readers and writers of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. Click here to read the full comment policy.
White space
Left Arrow
Courts
Image BART Shooting Case Moved To Los Angeles County Cou...
OAKLAND-An Alameda County Superior Court judge decided yesterda...Read More»
Courts
Image Change of Venue Considered for BART Shooting Case
OAKLAND-Arguments continued in Alameda County Superior Court today...Read More»
Courts
Image Court Hears Change of Venue Arguments in BART Shoo...
OAKLAND-The courtroom in Alameda County Superior Court w...Read More»
Courts
Image BART Case Hearing Draws Activists
In anticipation of the change of venue hearing for former BART police Offic...Read More»
Courts
Image Murder Conviction Overturned in 1985 West Berkeley...
A man with an extensive criminal history whose convictio...Read More»
Courts
Image Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Charges in BART Sho...
The former BART police officer accused of shooting Osca...Read More»
Right Arrow






Job Postings

White Space