Judge Releases Stadium Ruling
Date Added Wednesday, June 18, 2008 | 6:40 pm
Last Updated Wednesday, June 18, 2008 | 7:49 pm
Category: News > University > Academics and Administration
The long-awaited ruling regarding the fate of UC Berkeley's proposed athletic center near Memorial Stadium has finally been released.
The three plaintiffs-the city of Berkeley, the Panoramic Hill Association and the California Oak Foundation-have in-part won the suit, although Alameda County Superior Court Judge Barbara Miller said in the ruling that the university's environmental impact report for the athletic center is in compliance with environmental laws, with a few exceptions.
Since Miller said the proposed plans do not fully comply with either the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act or the California Environmental Quality Act, she in part granted to the plaintiffs the petitions for writ of mandate.
"The university has to go back to the drawing board at some level," said Michael Kelly, Panoramic Hill Association's vice president for UC relations.
Kelly said he thinks the ruling has long-term implications for how the university plans development projects.
At the same time, campus officials said the 129-page ruling looks promising.
Representatives of the parties involved in the suit are slated to hold press conferences throughout the evening.
Jacqueline Johnston is an assistant news editor. Contact her at jjohnston@dailycal.org
Comments (0) »
Comment PolicyThe Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regards to both the readers and writers of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. Click here to read the full comment policy.













Printer Friendly
Comments (









