Here We Go Again

Campus Issues: The ASUC Senate's irresponsible spending threatens the body's future financial stability and independent status.

Related Articles »





  • Printer Friendly Printer Friendly
  • Comments Comments (0)

One day after the Dow Jones industrial average closed above 10,000 for the first time this year, the market experienced its biggest one-day percentage drop since July 2. According to analysts, a significant decline in consumer spending may have fueled the latest downturn.

Given the economic climate, it's logical to expect that consumers would be wary to shell out the dollars for purchases beyond basic necessities. Yet, despite an equally precarious financial situation on this campus, the ASUC Senate continues to defy this logic and spend the money it should be saving as a precaution for an impending crisis.

After spending roughly two-thirds of the fund it uses to allocate money to student groups in just two meetings, the ASUC Senate has about $1,500-which is less than 10 percent-of the fund left. Though this depletion can be offset by transferring funds from its carry-forward reserves, as has been done in the past, this would be a financially irresponsible move.

Student groups are clearly feeling the pain of the recession, and seeking more support from the ASUC to help them (make it through) this difficult time. But with the senate constantly raiding its reserves to replenish the contingency fund, these groups will lose out in the long run when the senate lacks the resources to provide any funding or undertake any serious capital expenditures in years to come.

Though it makes sense to use reserves to tide things over until the economy gets better and student groups can better fend for themselves, it's unacceptable for the senate's irresponsible spending to become a trend. It's exactly this problem of overspending that brought about the creation of the Auxiliary in the first place.

ASUC senators represent our student body to the administration and the larger university community. As they continuously demonstrate their lack of financial foresight, it could threaten the independent status of the student government as well as discourage administrators from including students' input on important budgetary decisions that affect us all.






Comments (0) »

Comment Policy
The Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regards to both the readers and writers of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. Click here to read the full comment policy.
White space
Left Arrow
Editorials
Image Wilma Chan for State Senate
With two very qualified candidates vying to fill Senate President Pro Tem D...Read More»
Editorials
Image Tony Thurmond for State Assembly
No candidate running for the 14th Assembly District seat is completely unqu...Read More»
Editorials
Image Yes on Measure F
The proposal allows all voters in Alameda County to impose their will on un...Read More»
Editorials
Image No On Prop 98, Yes on Prop 99
While Propositions 98 and 99 protect private property from aggressive gover...Read More»
Right Arrow






Job Postings

White Space