Letters to the Editor
Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Category: Opinion
Speaker Ignites Controversy With Tonight's Visit
We, as Jewish and non-Jewish students, faculty, staff, and community
members, are very troubled by Hillel's decision to sponsor Daniel Pipes'
visit to Berkeley.
While we support Mr. Pipes' right to speak on campus, we are concerned that
Hillel's sponsorship of this event gives the false appearance of an
endorsement of his views from the Jewish community. Pipes has used his
stature to espouse some of the most vilely xenophobic sentiments that we
have ever heard from a modern American public figure. Pipes portrays a world
so threatened by Islamism that Muslim organizations are inherently
dangerous, Muslim public relations groups are inherently dishonest, and
Muslim names are red flags. While Pipes claims to differentiate between
"bad" Islamists and "good" moderate Muslims, he is so relentless in his
insistence that violent Islamism is the most urgent of threats that he
defames the religion he claims to respect. We urge Berkeley Hillel, an
organization deeply concerned about the history and persistence of
anti-Semitism in the world, to consider the implications of its sponsorship
of an individual whose rhetoric towards Muslims so directly echoes messages
directed against Jews in the past.
Ehud Moshe Appel, Gidon Felsen, Kendra Froshman, Sarah Jebrock, Rebecca Pedinoff, Emily Shaw, Lisa Rachel Stampnitzky, Calanit Saenger, Sarah Adler-McDonald, Mehammed Mack, Hudi Brenman, Jacqueline Brandner, Cyrus J. Farivar, Maya Kronfeld, Sajidah Wahdy, Samuel Melton, Yaniv Scherson, Angele Rosenberg,
UCB students
Sarah Anne Minkin, Sarah Bailey, Joel Kamnitzer, Sarah Staveteig, Barry Eidlin, Snehal Shingavi, Sarah Levin,
Anne Wolf, Rob Lipton,
Daniel Hoffman,
Graduate Students.
Carol Sanders,
Member, Jewish Voice for Peace.
Dr. Emily Gottreich Vice Chair, Center for Middle Eastern Studies UC Berkeley,
Molly Freeman, PhD.,
Mary Beth Kaufman,
Research Fellow, Center for Latin American Studies.
Diane Ames, Yvette Chalom, Judith Butler, L. Ling-chi Wang, Eitan Saenger,
community members.
Wendy Brown, Professor of Political Science, UC Berkeley,
Michael N. Nagler, Professor, Peace and Conflict Studies,
Donald S. Moore, Assistant Professor, Anthropology,
UC Berkeley,
Susan Ervin-Tripp,
Janet Adelman,
Professor of English,
Elizabeth Abel, Professor of English, UC Berkeley,
Bluma Goldstein,
Professor emerita, German Department, UC Berkeley,
Kaja Silverman, Professor of Rhetoric and Film; UC Berkeley, Maxine Elliot, Professor, Rhetoric and Comparative Literature,
Shanie Aki,
UC Berkeley Summer Staff
Controversy Should not Deter Meaningful Dialogue
This evening Dr. Daniel Pipes will speak on campus addressing the topic, "The Middle East Now: Up Close and On Campus".
The appearance of Dr. Daniel Pipes' at UC Berkeley is part of the Israel Action Committee's, Jewish Student Union's and Hillel's commitment to bringing a broad range of perspectives on Israel, the Middle East and related issues to the campus community. Dr. Pipes' academic and professional credentials make him an important voice on the topic he will address.
Other recently sponsored speakers include Ehud Barak, Dennis Ross, Marcia Freedman and Yossi Beilin. Each has shared an individual perspective, raised thought-provoking ideas, challenged and stimulated audiences. Neither IAC, JSU, Hillel nor individual students necessarily agree with all a speaker says. However, by presenting a broad range of views, we insure a better informed campus engaged in debate and discussion of the major issues of the day.
We do not go out of our way to bring controversial speakers to campus. But neither should any of us – particularly on this campus that has earned an international reputation for promoting and safeguarding free speech – shy away from speakers who have an important message and are committed to the core values of democracy, civility and diversity, values that inform our work on a daily basis.
We are pleased that our campus community will have a first-hand opportunity to hear Dr. Pipes' views, whether they expect to agree or disagree with what he says.
Adam Weisberg
Executive Director, Berkeley Hillel
Fulbright Snafu Outrages Graduate Assembly
Graduate students on the Berkeley campus were stunned last week by
the Department of Education decision to deny 2004-2005 Fulbright fellowship applications from 30 of our doctoral students. In the face of monstrous fee increases and budget cuts, this is yet another blow to UC Berkeley graduate students and to the nature of our university as a highly respected research institution.
This shocking decision does not follow the mission of the Department of Education to "strengthen the Federal commitment to assuring access to equal educational opportunity for every individual." Denying Berkeley graduate students the opportunity to compete for an important fellowship-on the basis of a computer error beyond the university's control-unfairly punishes Berkeley students. These students submitted their applications in a timely fashion to the Fulbright Program Advisor on campus and should therefore have equal and fair access to the fellowship program. The decision also compromises the public interest, by excluding some of the country's best
and brightest scholars from competing for a federally funded research fellowship.
Finally, the rejection of Berkeley's fellowship submissions undermines the Department's stated mission to "increase the accountability of Federal education programs to the public."
A rejection of our graduate scholars would greatly disappoint students, faculty, staff, and administration of our esteemed research institution and its venerable peer institutions.
Temina Madon,
Graduate Assembly Academic Affairs
Vice President
Jessica Quindel,
Graduate Assembly President
Comments (0) »
Comment PolicyThe Daily Cal encourages readers to voice their opinions respectfully in regards to both the readers and writers of The Daily Californian. Comments are not pre-moderated, but may be removed if deemed to be in violation of this policy. Comments should remain on topic, concerning the article or blog post to which they are connected. Brevity is encouraged. Posting under a pseudonym is discouraged, but permitted. Click here to read the full comment policy.













Printer Friendly
Comments (









