Over the past few days, I’ve become the most unproductive, groggy, exhausted human being. This is no doubt a result of my erratic sleeping patterns. My sleep schedule has consisted of going to bed no earlier than 3 a.m., waking up no later than 2 p.m. and taking obscenely long naps throughout the day when the exhaustion becomes too much to handle.

This isn’t something we students are unfamiliar with — during the school year, it basically becomes the norm. Days chock-full of classes, meetings, job obligations and extracurriculars leave the wee hours of the night as the only time to do homework, party or continue procrastinating. Our to-do lists are so cluttered that sleep is typically the last item on the list. No one disputes the necessity of sleep, but many of us downplay its importance — some of us believe it’s something we can be successful without. Even if you run consistently on four to five hours of sleep and manage to get the grades and have a social life, you’re definitely not as healthy as you could be.

In an April 2013 National Institute of Health newsletter, sleep expert Michael Twery explains that sleep regulates the immune system, growth hormones, appetite, cardiovascular health and blood pressure. Lack of sleep has also been linked to higher risks of heart disease, obesity and depression, according to the newsletter.

The environment at UC Berkeley inevitably leads us to believe that sleep and academic success are mutually exclusive. While I’m clearly no paragon of sleeping — there have been countless occasions when I’ve gotten out of bed in the morning only looking forward to the nap I’d take a few long and miserable hours later — it’s important to re-evaluate the way we sleep in the context of our daily lives and commitments, regardless of how difficult change may be.

The first step to getting a good night’s rest — finding out how much sleep is actually necessary. That amount of sleep actually varies from person to person, and what makes some people feel rested and refreshed may be completely different for others. On average, according to UC Berkeley’s own Tang Center, adults should sleep seven to eight hours per night to feel alert and free of fatigue.

But this fact doesn’t help much — simply knowing how much sleep you need doesn’t mean you’ll get it. So how do you fix your sleep schedule? It means going to bed before 3 a.m. in order to get more hours in. It means establishing a schedule and sticking to it — yes, even on weekends — which is something just as important as the quantity of sleep. Waking up at 8 a.m. one day, snoozing until noon the next and sleeping in all day during the weekend disrupts the body’s natural rhythms and makes you feel awful. By getting quality sleep consistently, you can prevent stress and psychological strain, according to a Clayton Sleep Institute study.

This same sleep quantity and consistency should also be supplemented with regular exercise and maintenance of a well-rounded diet free of stimulants late in the day to maximize the quality of sleep each night.

What happens when we hit the mid-afternoon wall and just can’t function? Well, that’s when our buddy, the nap, comes into play. Napping shouldn’t replace a good night’s sleep, but if done right, it can seriously improve concentration and focus. The Harvard School of Public Health concluded that the likelihood of developing heart disease is 40 percent less in people who nap regularly. The benefits are so potent that UC Davis health professionals have begun to encourage their students to accompany a full night’s sleep with 20- to 30-minute naps to improve productivity and boost academic success. But the key here is to not overdo it — a nap longer than 30 minutes might backfire, making you feel more tired and sluggish than you originally were.

So if you’re sick of constantly feeling fatigued and lethargic, try this experiment: Go to sleep and wake up at the same time every day just for a week and notice how you feel. Our commitments and obligations are hopefully a little less intense now than they are during the school year, so use the next month to gear up for the school year by stocking up on sleep.

Our generation has done a great job of giving sleep less priority than everything else, but its importance is on par with developing healthy eating habits, exercising and maintaining proper hygiene and psychological health — all things we vehemently try to pursue. But without the energy and and restorative benefits of sleep, we’re mistaken in thinking that health and general wellness are attainable.

If we truly want to take control of our health, we have to start prioritizing sleep, even if that means getting a little less done. Our post-college lives aren’t going to get much easier. The next four years aren’t the peak of our responsibilities and commitments, but they may very well be the peak of our youth. We need to establish proper routines and sleep habits now, because our bodies won’t be able to withstand college-style sleep patterns forever. The earlier we start, the healthier we’ll be in the long run.

Shahin Firouzbakht writes a Thursday column on health issues affecting student life.
Contact Shahin Firouzbakht at sfirouzbakht@dailycal.org.

The post You snooze, you gain? appeared first on The Daily Californian.

Lt. John Pike filed for workers’ compensation from his former employer, UC Davis, on June 27, claiming he suffered “psychiatric injury” resulting from the protests, according to the public records on the California Department of Industrial Relations website.

Legal representatives for both Pike and UC Davis will meet to settle the claim at a mandatory settlement conference, which will be held on Aug. 13 in Sacramento. If a settlement is not reached, the case will either move to a new hearing or be sent to a formal trial.

Pike could receive compensation between $130 and $270 per week for anywhere between a few weeks to life, according to the Department of Industrial Relations website. The compensation would come from UC Davis’ insurer, Sedgwick Claims Management Services.

Stephen Hopcraft, a spokesperson representing Pike’s legal team at the Marcus & Regalado law firm, said Pike will have to prove he has a psychiatric injury that is a result of his former job as a UC Davis police lieutenant.

“He could get some level of permanent disability compensation as a result of one specific incident or the cumulative effect of all he went through,” Hopcraft said. “But the legislature has made it very difficult to prove psychiatric injury or any injury that is not physically evident.”

UC Davis public affairs director Andy Fell said that the university’s lawyers are scheduled to engage in a discussion with Pike’s representatives about what benefits, if any, are owed to the former police lieutenant.

“We are not in agreement on benefits being claimed,” Fell said. “A workers’ compensation claim was filed, and the university is required to follow the California workers’ compensation process.”

A UC task force investigated Pike, another officer and former UC Davis police chief Annette Spicuzza following an incident in November 2011 between police and Occupy protesters on the UC Davis campus. The officers used pepper spray on the group of protesting students during the nationwide Occupy movement, contributing to a public debate about the appropriate use of force against student protesters.

The Reynoso task force reported in April 2012 that “Lieutenant Pike’s use of force in pepper spraying seated protesters was objectively unreasonable.”

On July 24, the 1st District Court of Appeals in California ruled in favor of a suit filed in May by the Los Angeles Times and The Sacramento Bee that the UC Regents and Federated University Police Officers Association cannot withhold the identities of the other police officers involved in the Nov. 11 pepper-spray incident as per the Freedom of Information Act.

The other officers’ identities will not be disclosed for at least 40 days, in the event that the FUPOA appeals the court’s decision.

Contact Stephanie Petrillo at spetrillo@dailycal.org.

The post Former lieutenant in UC Davis pepper-spray incident files workers’ compensation claim appeared first on The Daily Californian.

15 May Revolution/Creative Commons/Courtesy

This summer, UC Berkeley student Samantha Iyer traveled to Cairo, Egypt, looking for a unique academic experience. But a month after her arrival, the nation fell into political turmoil — some of which began to escalate into violent encounters.

Iyer, a doctoral student in the campus department of history, traveled to Egypt in late May to conduct research for her dissertation. On July 2, she received an email from UC Berkeley risk manager Andrew Goldblatt offering to evacuate her immediately. Despite recommendations from both the university and the government to leave because of rising political tension, Iyer decided to remain in Egypt until late August to continue her research.

While the demonstrations may appear dangerous to some, Iyer is familiar with the political climate in Egypt because she was there from 2010 to 2012.

“I decided to stay because outside of Tahrir Square and a few other hot spots, everything is pretty much the same as always,” Iyer said. “There are violent incidents happening here and there, which have been very depressing, but this is how it was before and during the period of transitional military rule from February 2011 to June 2012.”

The UC evacuation order and suspension of the fall study abroad program in Cairo come amid the removal of Mohamed Morsi as president and the creation of a military-led interim government in Egypt. During a demonstration in Alexandria on June 28, a protester allegedly killed Kenyon College student Andrew Pochter. Both anti-Morsi and pro-Morsi Egyptians continue to engage in both peaceful protests and violent outbreaks.

The political instability in Egypt heightened on June 30 when Egyptians marched to Tahrir Square to participate in demonstrations to remove Morsi from office.

From her apartment in the district of Dokki, Iyer observed demonstrators as they marched down Tahrir Street on their way to the Tahrir Square protests.

“They’re definitely loud,” Iyer said. “At the anti-Morsi demonstrations, the most common sign said ‘irhal,’ or ‘leave.’ After the military intervention, there were signs in English saying things like ‘CNN, it’s a revolution, not a military coup.’”

Fifth-year UC Berkeley student Angelica Hernandez witnessed the June 30 protests from a safe vantage point before being required to evacuate Egypt with her UC Davis study abroad program.

“It was frustrating because I know that I had boundaries with the study abroad group, but I wanted to interact with the Egyptian people,” Hernandez said. “I didn’t want to be stuck in my dorm room. I could have been at home if I didn’t want to do something new.”

Students are given 10 days after the UC trip insurance office begins a political evacuation to receive financial support for their evacuations, according to Goldblatt. Students who decided to stay in Egypt are still covered by UC trip insurance.

The June 30 and subsequent demonstrations began to interrupt Iyer’s research when the Egyptian National Library and Archives were closed for a week in early July. While the research institutions were closed, Iyer stayed in her apartment for the majority of the day working on her dissertation and reading the news.

Iyer will be staying in Egypt until the end of August and says she is taking normal precautions to stay safe.

“I wouldn’t want to go through Tahrir at night, for example, when the problems tend to arise,” Iyer said.

She has no immediate plans to return to Egypt after she leaves at the end of summer but said that her future projects could bring her back to complete more research.

“My parents are obviously worried, but like I said, everything around here is pretty much the same as always, except the occasional march passing to Tahrir Square,” Iyer said. “For most people, there’s just the same traffic, the same pollution, the same everyday problems, and then recent events are creating worries and uncertainty.”

Contact Elise Aliotti at ealiotti@dailycal.org.

The post UC Berkeley student conducts research in Egypt despite demonstrations appeared first on The Daily Californian.

Jasna Hodzic/Courtesy

A state appellate court ruled Tuesday that the University of California must disclose the names of all police officers who were involved in the Nov. 18, 2011, UC Davis pepper-spray incident.

The 1st District Court of Appeal, ruling in favor of the Los Angeles Times and The Sacramento Bee, contended that the Federated University Police Officers Association, citing confidentiality concerns, had failed to demonstrate that police officer identities were excludable from disclosure under the California Public Records Act.

“This a great victory for students who want to protest and have assurance that they won’t be brutalized,” said Thomas Burke, the attorney representing the newspapers.

The November 2011 incident, in which several UC Davis students were publicly pepper-sprayed by campus police, sparked national outrage over the accountability police face when dealing with student protesters. Students sued the university and reached a $1 million settlement in January.

The controversy began in April 2012 when a task force led by former California Supreme Court justice Cruz Reynoso released a report detailing the police’s misconduct. In the report, the task force conceded that campus police could have taken better steps to prevent “the objectively unreasonable decision to use pepper spray.”

The commission, however, refused to disclose the names of numerous police officers and only included the names of those directly involved, Lt. John Pike and then-campus police chief Annette Spicuzza.

The censorship followed an agreement between the UC Board of Regents and the FUPOA that the names would be kept confidential due to concerns about the police officers’ safety.

In May 2012, the LA Times and The Sacramento Bee filed a petition with the Alameda County Superior Court against the UC Regents to disclose the names.
At the Superior Court hearing, Burke argued that the FUPOA failed to cite any examples that police were harassed or threatened after the incident.

“Some of the police officers’ names had already been unofficially identified by various media sources, so when the issue came up in court, we argued that police officers would already have experienced harassment,” Burke said.

The appeals court ordered that the names be withheld for 40 days to allow the FUPOA to decide whether or not to appeal the decision.

“I feel that the court construed the confidentiality statutes too narrowly, and we’ll likely seek review in the California Supreme Court,” said Michael Morguess, attorney for the FUPOA.

Contact Dennis Vidal at dvidal@dailycal.org. Follow Dennis Vidal on Twitter @vidaldennis

The post Court rules officers implicated in UC Davis pepper-spraying must be named appeared first on The Daily Californian.

Changes to UC Regents Policy 7401 would extend the freedom of UC faculty and staff to freely critique policies adopted by the administration without fear of administrative discipline. The adoption comes amid a series of lawsuits that raise concerns about the limits of freedom of expression for public employees.

“There’s the issue that this policy revision will affect employer-employee relations, but I don’t think that’s a legitimate concern,” said UC President Mark Yudof of the decision.

Minor amendments also included revising the anti-discrimination policy to include “gender” and “gender expression” as well as members of all uniformed services among the prohibited types of discrimination in employment.

Susan Carlson, vice provost for academic personnel, presented the amendment to the regents on Thursday and argued that the revision protecting free speech is necessary to encourage faculty participation in governance of the UC system by ensuring protection under the First Amendment.

“Foundational policies are not often changed unless absolutely necessary,” Carlson said. “Faculty involvement in the governance of the UC is incredibly important to our public mission, and we’re ensuring that this policy change gives our employees the right to express their opinions towards university policy without fear of negative ramifications.”

The issue of free speech protection for government employees became a contentious issue in 2006, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Garcetti v. Ceballos, a case involving a Los Angeles district attorney, that the First Amendment does not prevent citizens from being disciplined for comments they make as public employees.

Joe Kiskis, vice chair of the Council of UC Faculty Associations, said that the decision did not present a problem for higher education until 2007, when UC Irvine professor Juan Hong brought up the issue in a 2007 U.S. District Court case.

In his lawsuit against university officials and the regents, Hong alleged that he had been denied a salary increase in 2004 due to his criticism of the hiring and promotion decisions within his department.

The District Court ruled in 2007 that Hong was not entitled to protection under the First Amendment because he made the comments as a public employee and not as a private citizen.

According to Kiskis, the court’s ruling in Hong’s appeal of the original decision left the question of the limits of academic expression unanswered. Before Hong’s appeal, Kiskis said faculty members believed they had the freedom to critique policies enacted by the university.

After the case, UC Davis professor Greg Pasternack, who chaired that campus’s committee of academic freedom, set out to revise university policy by proposing changes to the code of conduct. However, after the issue became entangled in several committees for the past two years, Pasternack lost track of his proposition and was surprised to hear about the regents’ decision.

“This is the greatest expansion of academic freedom made in a long time,” Pasternack said.

Contact Dennis Vidal at dvidal@dailycal.org. Follow Dennis Vidal on Twitter @vidaldennis.

The post Regents approve changes to faculty code of conduct to protect faculty speech appeared first on The Daily Californian.

If you’re like the vast majority of Cal students who reward themselves for a tough semester by lounging about in a state of perpetual laziness, you’re probably seated in a reclined position with your left hand propping up your unwashed face. You’ve been in this semihibernation phase for almost a fortnight, and you feel no guilt in letting others carry the burden of innovation and advancement this summer. It’s not that you don’t want to, of course, but the mere thought of getting out of bed is too much to handle. Well, you and all your lazy friends are in luck — we’ve got just the way for you to help the world in your pajamas.

In an effort to usher the world of natural history into the 21st century, UC Berkeley’s Essig Museum of Entomology is leading a project to transcribe field notes and create a database for its entire collection. The museum has estimated that it has more than 2 billion volumes in its world archives — a load that was projected to take several generations to catalog if only scientists did the job. (And you thought getting your biology notes in order was tedious.) The main time commitment is poring over pages and pages of field notes that are often poorly handwritten and converting them into the easy-to-read text that your eyes are feasting upon now.

The good news is that scientists, like yourselves, are lazy and don’t want to spend the next couple of decades doing grunt work. That’s where all of you come in — anyone, regardless of background or experience, can contribute to this project. The only things you need are Internet access — which you presumably have, seeing as you’re reading this — and to complete a simple online training session. This new push has been aptly dubbed “citizen science” and branches out from the Zooniverse project, a Q&A science Wikipedia-type site.

The Museum has joined forces with other entities to add birds and plants to its insect data, so you can choose whichever jars, drawers and shelves you want to help out with. Not only does this involve the collection at UC Berkeley, but you can also works with sister collections at places like Davis, Riverside, Santa Cruz and other states and museums. The awesome part is that you’re privy to the coolest and most valuable specimens out there — you may even catch a fleeting glimpse of some of the 200-year-old bugs that Charles Darwin nabbed.

Of course, there must be a catch, but the only one we could find is that you may encounter a scary-looking beetle or two. And if you ever get bored of helping write the annals of science and history, you can just as easily log off and go back to doing nothing. We know you’ll make the right choice.

Image source: Caro Wallis under Creative Commons

Contact Uday at umehta@dailycal.org or follow him on Twitter at @mehtakid.

The post You can help sort Berkeley bugs! appeared first on The Daily Californian.

Andrew Kuo/Senior Staff

Following months of controversy, UC Berkeley announced that it will withdraw from the systemwide UC Student Health Insurance Plan in the fall.

Chancellor Robert Birgeneau announced the decision to withdraw Thursday, joining four other UC campuses that are abandoning at least some parts of UC SHIP. The announcement comes after the systemwide Council of Chancellors approved various changes to UC SHIP, including campus withdrawal, in a meeting Wednesday.

“Today I am stating my support for the students’ position and, following their urging, announcing that UC Berkeley will be withdrawing from UC SHIP and returning to a UC Berkeley-operated student health insurance plan,” Birgeneau said in a statement.

Beginning Aug. 15, UC Berkeley will transition back into a campus-managed, fully funded insurance plan similar to what the campus had in place for decades before joining UC SHIP in 2011.

UC SHIP follows a self-funded model in which those paying the costs, in this case the UC system, are responsible for absorbing the plan’s risks, according to Bahar Navab, UC Berkeley’s student representative to the UC SHIP Advisory Board. Fully funded plans place risk on a separate insurance provider but generally have higher premiums.

UC SHIP currently has a $400,000 lifetime cap and a $10,000 prescription drug coverage cap. As a fully funded plan, UC Berkeley-provided insurance would also have to comply with the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits these coverage caps.

In a letter sent to Birgeneau last month by UC Berkeley student representatives, Navab and ASUC President Connor Landgraf wrote that poor management from the UC Office of the President and a desire for more local control were some of the reasons students favored withdrawing from UC SHIP.

“I think that localized control and more decentralized governance is what’s best for our campus right now,” Navab said. “It’s a two-year plan, and we can always re-evaluate after two years. If UC SHIP has changed enough that we want to go back to it, we always have that option.”

UC Berkeley’s decision to withdraw comes in light of UC SHIP’s projected $46.5 million net deficit, which earlier prompted the possibility of premium increases across the board.

According to Kim LaPean, communications manager at the Tang Center, the new plan is expected to include a 13 percent premium increase for undergraduates and a 20 percent increase for graduate students, though the campus has yet to finalize rates. LaPean said benefits will not decrease under the campus plan and that officials are working to ensure that students will be able to see the same outside carriers.

“Berkeley students were really clear that they did not want to lose benefits,” LaPean said. “The changes that they’re going to see are all going to be in the favor of the student.”

Other campuses that decided to partially withdraw from UC SHIP include UC Davis, UC Irvine, UC Riverside and UC Santa Barbara. Some campuses, like UCLA, have opted to stick with UC SHIP.

Students with coverage through UC SHIP next year will also see changes, including lifting the lifetime maximum, annual pharmacy cap and other caps on essential care. The UC Office of the President is currently reviewing options to close the deficit, but UC spokesperson Brooke Converse said students will not have to pay for the deficit through premium increases.

“Our job right now is to respect the campuses that want to leave,” said Scott Arno, the UCLA student representative to UC SHIP Advisory Board. “No campus should be forced into this plan. We need to make it run better so that they’ll want to come back.”

Mitchell Handler covers academics and administration. Contact him at mhandler@dailycal.org and follow him on Twitter @mitchellhandler.

The post UC Berkeley to abandon SHIP appeared first on The Daily Californian.

After nine years atop one of the world’s best universities, Chancellor Robert Birgeneau will be ending his reign in just about a month. His resignation, largely overshadowed by the now-infamous and now-nonexistent unibrow of Chancellor-Elect Nicholas Dirks, is now a looming inevitability. Yet, the physics professor appears to be intent in his decision, and we think we know why.

1. His increasingly croaky voice has made it hard to give speeches. Though he is certainly eloquent in his words and impeccable in his demeanor, it would be undoubtedly difficult for anyone to command the attention and respect of thousands of 20-year-olds — unless that someone has the light-tempered voice of Morgan Freeman.

2. He’d like to move to a house that isn’t prone to being attacked. Back in 2009, a number of protesters made the upward trek to the University House and attempted to reenact a scene from Game of Thrones, laying siege to the house — albeit, for a matter of minutes — by attempting to torch it and break windows and lights. For whatever reason, the aggressors included students from UC Davis, and we’re sure that the Chancellor is excited to spend more time in his physics office — where he might have some particle accelerator beams to protect himself.

3. He is no longer rolling in green. No, not the usual type of green that’s associated with the Cal campus. Think state funding, of which he has lost over 58% over his tenure. Birgeneau referred to this massive drop as a “disinvestment by the state” in the UC system.

4. He’d like to enjoy his time at Berkeley without being questioned or interrupted. At the end of 2011, his speech to the ASUC senate was cut off by protesters in the crowd, to which Birgeneau responded with folded arms and a sarcastic smile. Following his handling of a series of protests, a petition that had garnered thousands of signatures was brought to the ASUC, calling for Birgeneau’s resignation. Thick skin and a favorable vote from Student Action kept him in power Why Chancellor Birgeneau is ready to step down — for a while, at least.

5. He was supposed to be liberated from his job five freaking months ago! The original plan was for him to step down at the end of the 2012 calendar year, something he announced close to his birthday. Instead of going through with his plan as a 70^th birthday present to himself, he extended his stay even further — a stay that was originally supposed to be seven years will now end at nine and a half.

It’s probably true that the tumult of Birgeneau’s life will decrease dramatically once he’s officially replaced as Cal’s Chancellor. But it won’t be gone completely — he may be a retired Chancellor, but he’ll still be a member of three departments on campus, a far cry from the lives of old men retiring from pristine positions like the papacy. But don’t expect him to stop making headlines: he claims he still has “one more truly significant… experiment to come” in his academic career.

Image source: The Daily Californian (left and right) & Andrew Ratto (center) under Creative Commons

Contact Uday at umehta@dailycal.org or follow him on Twitter at @mehtakid.

The post Why Chancellor Birgeneau is ready to step down appeared first on The Daily Californian.

Carli Baker /Staff

I’m being selfish when I say that UC Berkeley needs to go back to its roots. As a member of the Student Organic Gardening Association, a facilitator of our organic gardening DeCal and a student deeply passionate about food systems and sustainable agriculture, I can clearly see how little stock our administration puts in undergraduate agricultural endeavors. Think back to Occupy the Farm, where people protested against the development of the campus’s last large agricultural plot of land, its not hard to see how far UC Berkeley has come from our humble roots as a small land-grant university.

Land was given to what is now UC Berkeley because the Morrill Act, which necessitated that these colleges act for the “benefit of agriculture and the mechanical arts.” The California Organic Act of 1867-68 not only outlined the goals of this new university but specified that, “as soon as practicable a system of moderate manual labor shall be established in connection with the Agricultural College … having for its object practical education in agriculture, landscape gardening, the health of the students.”

Doesn’t that sound nice? An opportunity to learn about agriculture, empower ourselves as Millennials to learn about our food system and see first hand the journey from farm to fork. But alas, we’ve strayed far from this original vision. The last true university-owned student space for agriculture and gardening at UC Berkeley is SOGA, a student-created and student-run small plot of land located on Walnut and Virginia Streets. During the fall, SOGA becomes a living classroom for a wonderful class about urban agriculture, but this class constricts students’ abilities to have the final say in garden activities, and we deserve more than an ever-dwindling plot of land on the far side of campus.

Last semester, I had dreams to proposition the campus to give us a green space that could be ours 365 days a year. I envisioned an educational organic garden with native bee hedgerows on the hill that currently holds Campbell Hall construction crews. We’d be impossible to ignore and would offer cooking classes, gardening demonstrations and would allow anyone affiliated with the campus to share in our harvests after they’d worked the land for a few hours.

I saw this space in addition to SOGA’s current space, one that could align with the goals of Occupy the Farm and that would reaffirm our campus’ history as an agricultural giant. It could become a place of rest amid busy schedules and hectic lives. One of my favorite parts about facilitating SOGA this year is the time it allows me to relax, and revel in the sensations of sun on my shoulders and dirt between my fingers. I find peace and meditative calm in the repetitive nature of weeding, watering, sowing and pruning.

Unfortunately, I became discouraged after a failed grant attempt and a sense of helplessness in the face of so much bureaucratic red tape needed to make this dream a reality. I want a space to grow with my fellow students all year without having to enroll in a class that barely fits into my schedule in order to spend a few hours in the garden.

I came to UC Berkeley with dreams of sustainability that have morphed into goals and dreams about the future of local, environmentally-conscious agriculture. I didn’t even bother applying to UC Davis, mostly because it was too close to home and too far from urban centers, but as I look back I wonder if I did belong on the Farm. They’re also a large land-grant university, but with amazing environmental programs, their own student farm, and support of the campus administration. I’ve done my best here to find niches to fulfill my intellectual and environmental passions by joining a food collective, working on waste reduction, developing my own major in the College of Natural Resources and more. I hope someone in the future tries to make undergraduate agriculture more of a reality on campus. I don’t regret coming to Berkeley, which is in my mind the best public university in the world — I just hope we leave some room for our past in all our future plans.

Contact Carli Baker at cbaker@dailycal.org or follow her on Twitter: @carliannebaker.

The post Berkeley as a land grant university appeared first on The Daily Californian.

Maura Chen/Staff

Contact the opinion desk at opinion@dailycal.org.

The post College lovin’ appeared first on The Daily Californian.