daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • JANUARY 22, 2023

Year! Review! Read our 2022 Year in Retrospect Issue!

Progressive slate candidates likely to win three seats on Rent Stabilization Board

article image

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

NOVEMBER 07, 2012

Four contested seats on the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board are likely to go mostly to candidates from the Progressive Affordable Housing Slate, data shows as of press time.

As of Wednesday afternoon, with all voting precincts reported, the lead candidates are Judy Shelton, Asa Dodsworth and Alejandro Soto-Vigil from the Progressive slate, and Judy Hunt from the opposing Tenants United for Fairness slate. Incumbent Igor Tregub lost his seat by a mere 103 votes, and totals for the third, fourth and fifth place candidates – Dodsworth, Soto-Vigil, and Tregub, respectively – are extremely close. Since mail-in and provisional ballots are still being processed, results may shift.

The battle for the four available rent board seats between the largely incumbent Progressive Affordable Housing slate and the challenging Tenants United for Fairness slate has been particularly contentious.  TUFF incumbent Nicole Drake and TUFF slate candidates Jay James, Kiran Shenoy and Judy Hunt used an unfavorable Alameda County Superior Court grand jury report to critique the Progressive slate candidates, while city planning commissioner Patti Dacey filed an Oct. 26 complaint that accused the TUFF slate of circumventing Berkeley’s campaign contribution laws.

The June grand jury report, which criticized the board’s hiring procedures, high registration fees and too-high compensation for the board’s executive director, concluded after a nine-month investigation that Berkeley’s rent board evidenced a pro-tenant bias. The rent board contended that the grand jury report was factually inaccurate.

TUFF’s candidates have also been subject to criticism. In a complaint filed with the Fair Campaign Practices commission, planning commissioner Patti Dacey alleged that TUFF candidates had broken city and state laws.

The complaint also stated that TUFF’s use of a “slate mailer organization” to advertise TUFF candidates while opposing Measure U was a strategy to circumvent Berkeley’s strict individual contribution laws and funnel large amounts of corporate money to support the TUFF slate.

While the TUFF candidates’ attorney stated at an Oct. 30 meeting of the city’s Fair Campaign Practices Commission that TUFF has returned about $1300 in contributions from businesses, Drake, James and Shenoy asserted that TUFF did not intentionally break election law.

The city’s Fair Campaign Practices Commission will hear a detailed report on the complaint’s charges on Nov. 15.

Contact Gautham Thomas at [email protected].
LAST UPDATED

NOVEMBER 07, 2012


Related Articles

On Tuesday, Berkeley’s Fair Campaign Practices Commission heard a complaint alleging that Tenants United for Fairness, one of the two slates running for the city’s Rent Stabilization Board, violated city and state election laws.
On Tuesday, Berkeley’s Fair Campaign Practices Commission heard a complaint alleging that Tenants United for Fairness, one of the two slates running for the city’s Rent Stabilization Board, violated city and state election laws.
An Alameda County Superior Court grand jury report was released Monday criticizing the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board for misconduct regarding fees charged by the board, hiring procedures and bias in favor of tenants.
An Alameda County Superior Court grand jury report was released Monday criticizing the Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board for misconduct regarding fees charged by the board, hiring procedures and bias in favor of tenants.