daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Take a look at our 2022 midterm elections special issue!

ASUC bill expresses support for transparency in UC president selection process

article image

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

NOVEMBER 07, 2013

In response to concerns that students were not properly involved in the selection of Janet Napolitano as UC president, a bill in support of adding student voice to the hiring process for top UC officials was introduced to the ASUC Senate on Wednesday.

Authored by Student Action Senator Pavan Upadhyayula and his legislative director, Kris Nalla, the bill, SB 49, expresses support for a UC Student Association resolution that proposes improving the transparency of the UC president selection process and expanding the role of a student committee that advises the regents during the process.

According to the UC Policy on Appointment of the President of the University, students may get involved in the selection process through the Student Advisory Committee, which consists of at least one student from each UC campus, and through the student regent.

But student input does not extend much further. Student Regent-designate Sadia Saifuddin said this is, at least partially, to protect the privacy of potential candidates.

“Most qualified applicants would only apply given that confidentiality is guaranteed,” Saifuddin said. “So it’s difficult to make it a completely open process and reveal the identities of the applicants. There currently is student input, but it’s debatable whether it’s enough.”

UC spokesperson Steve Montiel explained that the UC Regents lead the selection process because the UC president answers directly to them. He added that the chancellor of each campus typically handles student affairs more directly than the UC president.

“The president not only runs the educational enterprise but also the medical schools and services and other facilities,” Montiel said. “And the president reports directly to the regents.”

SB 49 argues that the covert nature of the selection of high-level UC officials is not an excuse to exclude students from participation.

By working with the UCSA, Upadhyayula hopes to increase the likelihood that policy reforms are enacted that will result in more opportunities for students to get more involved in the selection process. He hopes reviewing the selection process will ensure that “all levels of administration are held accountable.”

If the bill is passed by the ASUC Senate, ASUC External Affairs Vice President Safeena Mecklai will create a commission of students on campus to examine the selection process, review the UCSA proposal and submit a report of their findings to the regents by the end of the academic year.

“The way the UC president is elected is a long-term issue,” Mecklai said. “I don’t want the UC faced with another case in the future 10 years from now where students don’t feel that they had involvement in the decision.”

SB 49 will be reviewed in the ASUC Senate’s university and external affairs committee Monday.

Jennie Yoon is the lead student government reporter. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @jennieyoon_.
LAST UPDATED

NOVEMBER 11, 2013


Related Articles

featured article
The last two presidential searches – Yudof’s in 2007-08 and his predecessor Robert Dynes’ in 2002-03 – had about 11 months to complete and designated a successor 3 months before the outgoing president officially stepped down.
The last two presidential searches – Yudof’s in 2007-08 and his predecessor Robert Dynes’ in 2002-03 – had about 11 months to complete and designated a successor 3 months before the outgoing president officially stepped down.
featured article
The University of California Student Association voted Saturday to condemn a contentious state Assembly resolution aimed at combating anti-Semitism at California’s public institutions of higher education.
The University of California Student Association voted Saturday to condemn a contentious state Assembly resolution aimed at combating anti-Semitism at California’s public institutions of higher education.