daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • FEBRUARY 02, 2023

Ring in the New Year with our 2023 New Year's Special Issue!

UC overturns decision to withdraw all funding to Lick Observatory

article image

LORENZ ANGELO GONZALES | FILE

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

|

Senior staff reporter

NOVEMBER 03, 2014

The UC Office of the President revoked stipulations that withdrew all public funding to Lick Observatory by 2018, re-establishing UC support for the university-owned observatory located on Mount Hamilton.

In a letter, the university leaves it to the UC Observatories director, with assistance from the UCO advisory committee and others, to determine the distribution of public funds — currently $5 million per year — between Lick Observatory and other entities such as Keck Observatory and Thirty Meter Telescope.

Last September, the university mandated that Lick become self-supporting, requiring that its funding come from alternative sources. The intention was to reallocate UC funds to higher-priority, cutting-edge facilities such as the Thirty Meter Telescope, a telescope scheduled to open in 2021 that will become the most powerful in the world.

“Lick is historically important and educationally important, which added urgency to the need to reassess (funding),” said Claire Max, interim director of UC Observatories, a UC astronomical research unit.

According to the letter, the university decided to repeal the requirements after noting that UCO’s plan for the 2015 fiscal year budgeted resources for Lick without impeding other goals for UC astronomy.

“There is substantial interest among UC astronomers and other communities for continued operation of Lick by UC,” the letter states. “Further, we recognize that there is active engagement on several fronts to diversify Lick’s funding.”

Max said that there is enough money in the current budget of UCO to run Lick Observatory, which has an operating budget of roughly $1.5 million, and that the university decided it was best if UCO had more flexibility.

Garth Illingworth, a UC Santa Cruz professor of astronomy, noted that with the budget cuts, the remaining challenge is finding funds to adequately support all three entities.

“A crucial part of (funding) is that the university has to be seen to care about this,” Illingworth said. “This change is a good one from that perspective. We should be able to go to donors now and say the university is committed to (Lick Observatory).”

According to Max, since the community’s “flurry” to mobilize against the withdrawal of university funds, there has been interest in Lick from outside groups. In particular, UCO hopes to bring in more money by increasing the educational and outreach activities Lick provides.

ASUC Senator Lavanya Jawaharlal, who sponsored a bill supporting the preservation of Lick Observatory, said that she is “gratified” the university is recognizing the observatory’s importance and that she hopes there will be more transparency and attention to student input in future processes regarding the allocation of funds to Lick.

The Lick budget for the next several years has not been determined, and negotiations with potential funding and educational outreach partners are ongoing.

Contact Suhauna Hussain at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @suhaunah.
LAST UPDATED

NOVEMBER 03, 2014


Related Articles

featured article
I would like to commend Virgie Hoban and The Daily Californian for the excellent Sept. 2 article regarding Lick Observatory and the university’s astronomy program. But the comments by former UC vice president of research and graduate studies Steven Beckwith and Provost Aimee Dorr about the University of California Observatories Board and the board's recommendation to cut funding for Lick Observatory are misleading.
I would like to commend Virgie Hoban and The Daily Californian for the excellent Sept. 2 article regarding Lick Observatory and the university’s astronomy program. But the comments by former UC vice president of research and graduate studies Steven Beckwith and Provost Aimee Dorr about the University of California Observatories Board and the board's recommendation to cut funding for Lick Observatory are misleading.
featured article
The economic recession and significant decline in state funding for higher education have forced the university to scrutinize every program and every dollar spent and to make many difficult choices in recent years.
The economic recession and significant decline in state funding for higher education have forced the university to scrutinize every program and every dollar spent and to make many difficult choices in recent years.
featured article
Researchers are reeling from the abrupt decision last year to terminate all funding for the university’s only fully owned observatory — the only one where graduate students and postdoctoral scholars from across the UC system can design and execute their own research projects.
Researchers are reeling from the abrupt decision last year to terminate all funding for the university’s only fully owned observatory — the only one where graduate students and postdoctoral scholars from across the UC system can design and execute their own research projects.
featured article