daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • FEBRUARY 02, 2023

Ring in the New Year with our 2023 New Year's Special Issue!

State elections mean little change for higher education, experts say

article image

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

NOVEMBER 05, 2014

In California, Tuesday’s midterm election gave Gov. Jerry Brown another four years in office and took away a Democratic supermajority in the state Senate, yet some policy experts say the political shifts will have little effect on higher education.

Both the governor’s race and the race for state superintendent of public instruction went to incumbents. The state Assembly, meanwhile, remained in the hands of the Democrats, although they may also lose their supermajority there with two key Assembly races undecided as of Wednesday evening.

For this election, little change was a good thing for the higher education system, according to W. Norton Grubb, campus professor emeritus at UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Education.

President of Berkeley College Republicans Claire Chiara, who formerly worked as a Daily Californian staff writer, agreed that the elections wouldn’t bring change but said this meant continued problems for the UC system.

“Neel Kashkari presented a clear vision for systemic changes to the UC system, while Jerry Brown may continue to uphold the status quo,” Chiara said.

Brown won a resounding victory, winning about 59 percent of the vote to secure a historic fourth term in office.

“The world looks pretty troubled out there,” Brown said in his victory speech. “The country is facing a lot of uncertainty. But here in California, where once they called us a failed state, we’re now showing the way.”

Tuition at the UC system increased in the early years of Brown’s tenure, but it has been frozen at 2011-12 levels for the last three years. Brown made a deal with the university in which he agreed to 4 or 5 percent increases in state funding each year in exchange for keeping tuition constant until 2016-17.

But the biggest effect on California higher education likely comes not from the state races but from the national races and the Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate.

“Republicans now control both branches of Congress, which is absolutely a step in the right direction toward fiscal responsibility,” Chiara said. “The federal government must minimize its role in providing student loans and encourage students and their families to seek private-sector financing.”

Republican control in the Senate means less federal student aid and less funding for research centers such as the National Institutes of Health, which provide much of the research funds to the university, according to Grubb.

The federal government provided more than $2 billion in funds for university research in 2012-13 — more research funds than were provided by all other sources combined, according to university data.

Grubb sees these funding cuts as damaging to the higher education system and sees the Republican takeover of the Senate as “the worst aspect of this election for higher education.”

In the race for state superintendent of public instruction, incumbent Tom Torlakson beat challenger Marshall Tuck by 4 percentage points. Torlakson was supported by teachers’ unions, while Tuck was backed by the California Charter Schools Association.

“Tonight is a win for the people who do more than talk about improving education — tonight is a win for the people who do something about it,” Torlakson said in his victory statement.

Although none of the propositions directly affected higher education, the University of California Student Association actively campaigned for Proposition 47, which reduces penalties for certain nonviolent crimes. Prop. 47 passed with about 59 percent of the vote.

Daniel Tutt is the lead higher education reporter. Contact him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter @danielgtutt.
LAST UPDATED

NOVEMBER 06, 2014


Related Articles

featured article
Of the more than 800,000 Alameda County citizens registered to vote, only about 28 percent of residents voted in this year’s midterm elections — not including mail-in ballots — a turnout markedly lower than the 2012 presidential election and the 2010 election.
Of the more than 800,000 Alameda County citizens registered to vote, only about 28 percent of residents voted in this year’s midterm elections — not including mail-in ballots — a turnout markedly lower than the 2012 presidential election and the 2010 election.
featured article
featured article
featured article
featured article
Two candidates will face off for the governor’s seat in California this election, each with a different view of how to organize and fund the state's higher education system.
Two candidates will face off for the governor’s seat in California this election, each with a different view of how to organize and fund the state's higher education system.
featured article