daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • FEBRUARY 02, 2023

Ring in the New Year with our 2023 New Year's Special Issue!

Lit with Lindsay: I was in Berkeley with my communist reader

article image

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

APRIL 23, 2015

I stumbled upon the class on accident while looking for a different room in Wheeler Hall — a classic freshman mistake.

Fast forward a week later, and I found myself sitting in a circle with the professor and about five other students, clutching “The Communist Manifesto” and wondering how the hell I had ended up there, in a senior research seminar on manifesto modernism, during my first semester in college.

Also, most of my classmates were actually either communists or other far-leftists, which was intimidating, as it meant that I was the only person in the class who hadn’t yet read the book.

But despite the strange turn of events, I decided to stay with the seminar, because I had fallen in love with reading “The Communist Manifesto.”

As a disclaimer, this isn’t to say that I’m a communist, nor is this a stab at being “edgy” and controversial. Rather, when I say that I had fallen in love with reading “The Communist Manifesto,” I mean that learning to read the book was a truly great experience that coming to enjoy was a challenge for me, because of the stigma I held against communism itself.

Which, looking back, is so strange — there’s something suspicious about approaching any text as a hate-read to begin with. Some people hate-watch “Twilight” or “Sharknado,” because, by popular account, these movies are hilariously bad and fun to make fun of — and in the same way, before this class I had only thought to look at “The Communist Manifesto” as a hate-read.

And I think this is partially because the United States tends to treat communism as either a dirty word or a punchline — perhaps as a lingering aftereffect of the Cold War-era anti-communist fervor. I grew up thinking of communism in a way that was deeply conflated with tyranny, death and horrifying civil rights abuses. Plus, due to the weirdly pervasive North Korea and Soviet Russia jokes circulating in popular media, I had sort of also accepted that communism was somehow also absurd and laughable — after all, if James Franco can do it, so can I.

So, why read “The Communist Manifesto,” if not as a hate-read?

Coming into college, I had no idea, and I found it hard to take the manifesto seriously as a piece of literature. And, feeling kind of stranded and forlorn in a classroom populated by seniors who seemed to have a much better grip on this whole college thing than I did, I asked myself this question on the regular, supremely pissed off at my own poor academic decision-making and determined to stay pissed.

But in the end, I was lucky and found myself in an incredibly accepting environment. There, learning alongside classmates who already knew to take the manifesto seriously — not specifically as a set of political directives, but as literature that you can examine level-headedly and in terms of its literary value — I fell in love with reading again, and by extension, with the manifesto.

Part of it was because the book itself has an incredible and fascinating history — it’s kind of mind-bending to think about how influential “The Communist Manifesto” has been, both in terms of history and the literary canon. This manifesto effectively launched an entire genre — it’s literally “genre-defining,” which is a title that you can’t really nail onto many other texts — like, can you even say what the first genre-defining poem was? Nah.

But mostly, the appeal of the manifesto was in the fact that through reading it, I had learned my first really important lesson in college — to cast off biased preconceptions of books and approach reading in a more open-minded way. In short, to read first and think before passing judgment.

So why read a hate-read?

To “broaden your horizons” —  that’s what reading “The Communist Manifesto” did for me. But also, we should read hate-reads because the act of reading is about opening ourselves up to new voices — to engage in a discussion with the author. And by seriously reading a book that you want to hate, you open yourself up to a dialogue that you may not be able to access otherwise.

Lindsay Choi writes Thursday’s column on literature. Contact [email protected].

Contact Lindsay Choi at  or on Twitter

LAST UPDATED

MAY 02, 2019


Related Articles

featured article
featured article
featured article
featured article
featured article
As an English major, I’ve done my fair share of moaning, wailing and teeth-gnashing about the collapse of the market for books — but to be fair, it’s not exactly a mystery why it’s happened.
As an English major, I’ve done my fair share of moaning, wailing and teeth-gnashing about the collapse of the market for books — but to be fair, it’s not exactly a mystery why it’s happened.
featured article