daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

Apply to The Daily Californian by September 8th!

CA Fair Political Practices Commission investigates Measure DD campaign

article image

PRIYANKA KARTHEKEYAN | FILE

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

|

City News Editor

NOVEMBER 03, 2016

California’s Fair Political Practices Commission, or FPPC, is currently investigating the Yes on Measure DD campaign on suspicion of violating the Political Reform Act’s campaign disclosure requirements.

The FPPC sent a letter Wednesday to the Measure DD campaign and its sponsor, the Berkeley Property Owners Association, informing them of the investigation. As first reported by Berkeleyside, the investigation was launched in light of a complaint submitted by the UC Berkeley Progressive Students Association, or PSA, last month alleging that Measure DD listed donors improperly on finance documents and that several advertisements lacked mandatory disclosure requirements.

“At this time, we have not made any determination about the matter,” the FPPC stated in the letter. “We are simply providing you with this information and will be contacting you again … regarding this matter.”

Measure DD is a ballot measure that would raise the business license tax from 1.081 percent to 1.5 percent for those who own three or more units. Competing Measure U1 would raise the tax to 2.88 percent for owners of more than five units. In addition, Measure U1 would provides exemptions for nonprofits that provide affordable housing, as well as new developments for their first 12 years as residential rental units.

The PSA alleged in a press release that the Measure DD campaign listed donations from multiple properties, even though they were owned by the same individual. According to Krista Gulbransen — executive director of the Berkeley Rental Housing Coalition, BPOA’s political and legal arm — her organization is currently in touch with the lead investigator of the case.

“Frivolous FPPC complaints are the oldest trick in the book for campaigns that want to distract voters from the issues,” Gulbransen said in an email. “In this case, they want to distract from the fact that Measure U1 is a regressive giveaway to big developers.”

Jessica Lynn is an assistant news editor. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @jessicailynn.
LAST UPDATED

NOVEMBER 03, 2016


Related Articles

featured article
Hanford-based Raj Properties donated $85,000 and Berkeley-based Waterbury Properties donated $18,000, according to a contributions report filed Monday.
Hanford-based Raj Properties donated $85,000 and Berkeley-based Waterbury Properties donated $18,000, according to a contributions report filed Monday.
featured article
featured article
With the general election less than two weeks away, Measure DD’s campaign has now acquired more than $577,000 in total monetary contributions for the calendar year, while the opposing Measure U1’s campaign has raised about $71,000.
With the general election less than two weeks away, Measure DD’s campaign has now acquired more than $577,000 in total monetary contributions for the calendar year, while the opposing Measure U1’s campaign has raised about $71,000.
featured article
featured article
The UC Berkeley Progressive Student Association, or PSA, filed a complaint Monday against the Committee for Real Affordable Housing for alleged violations by the “Yes on Measure DD, No on Measure U1” campaign, according to a statement from the ASUC Housing Commission.
The UC Berkeley Progressive Student Association, or PSA, filed a complaint Monday against the Committee for Real Affordable Housing for alleged violations by the “Yes on Measure DD, No on Measure U1” campaign, according to a statement from the ASUC Housing Commission.
featured article