In July 2020, Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguín publicly called to defund the police and reinvest in alternative public safety strategies. Now, the same city government that unanimously voted to paint “Black Lives Matter” on public streets has chosen to entertain a budget which, as proposed, allocates one-third of all general funds to the Berkeley Police Department — nearly a $7.5 million increase from the 2021 budget and, after a one year decrease in 2021, an $8 million increase from pre-pandemic police expenditures.
The proposed budget lacks any concrete plan for “public safety reimagining” — financial allocations for these efforts remain “to be determined.” While this is the first time in four years that the expenditures for health, housing and community services have exceeded the police budget, community programs for youth education, domestic violence prevention, homeless services and food security saw a 22% budget decrease.
Despite objections from the Berkeley community, the proposed budget has yet to be altered and will be finalized June 29. Exactly how BPD will use its $77.8 million allocation has yet to be fully determined. It seems city leaders are writing a check to BPD with essentially no strings attached.
Local activists are calling for a Specialized Care Unit trained to respond to noncriminal police service calls, such as mental or physical health crises. Too many lives have been lost at the hands of police who have failed to de-escalate mental health emergencies — more than 1 in 5 people fatally shot by police in the United States suffer from a mental illness. Berkeley residents should be able to call for help without fearing the help itself.
Calls to defund the police have been met with backlash at the state and national level. But when local elected officials blatantly disregard the voices of their community, it packs an extra punch. If the City Council is serious about decreasing crime rates, the money allocated toward BPD could be redirected to fund community programs addressing youth, homelessness, mental health, food insecurity and domestic violence.
And while money continues to funnel into BPD, the City Council has offered no new concrete strategy to address the racial disparities found in Berkeley police stops. A city audit found that Black people accounted for 34% of stops made by BPD despite constituting only 8% of the population. With BPD armed with a massive budget, we can expect the cycle of unwarranted stops to continue.
After a year of performative activism and empty promises, the City Council must be held accountable for its actions. The council has an opportunity to decrease funding for unwarranted and discriminatory stops and ineffective public safety strategies. Instead, it opted to uphold the status quo and let another year pass without substantive changes to Berkeley’s policing.
It’s something that Berkeley voters should keep in mind in 2022 and 2024 while voting for City Council.
Editorials represent the majority opinion of the editorial board as written by the summer 2021 opinion editor, Sarah Siegel.
Clarification: A previous version of this editorial may have implied that Berkeley City Council proposed the current budget and has provided no strategies for reforming traffic stops in the past year. In fact, the city manager proposed the current budget, which is being deliberated by City Council and the mayor, and reforms for police traffic stops were offered in February.
Correction: A previous version of this editorial incorrectly stated that the city budget would be finalized June 15. In fact, the city budget will be finalized June 29. A previous version of this editorial incorrectly stated that Berkeley City Council had promised to cut police budgets by 50%. In fact, a former City Council member promised to cut police budgets by 50%.