daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • JUNE 02, 2023

Apply to The Daily Californian!

Community members allege unlawful agreement between campus, city

article image

MEGHNATH DEY | STAFF

A petition was filed against UC Berkeley and the city of Berkeley alleging that neither campus nor the city conducted public comment sessions regarding plans to develop parts of the city.

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

|

Lead Higher Education Reporter

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Make UC a Good Neighbor, People’s Park Historic District Advocacy Group and People’s Park Council filed a petition against UC Berkeley and the city of Berkeley, alleging that both parties failed to hold a public comment session for negotiations about city development plans.

According to a campus press release, the city agreed last July to drop its lawsuit against campus over the Upper Hearst housing project, as well as to not challenge campus’s People’s Park and Anchor House developments. Campus also agreed to pay the city about $4 million a year for 16 years, the press release added.

Make UC a Good Neighbor, People’s Park Historic District Advocacy Group and People’s Park Council amended their initial petition on Jan. 20, according to a press release from People’s Park Council.

David Axelrod, attorney for the petitioners, noted that “timely service” of the amended petition is “underway.”

The petition alleges the campus and city agreement violates the Brown Act and Measure N for failing to provide a session for members of the public to comment on the agreement before approval, as well as Measure L for “collaborating in the destruction of People’s Park,” the press release said.

“Public agencies, such as those in the City of Berkeley’s administration, are not required by the Brown Act to hold live hearings to solicit public comment about whether or not they should settle cases that are being litigated in a court,” campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof said in an email.

Mogulof added that campus was “transparent” and gave “a great deal of information” to the public about the agreement.

Additionally, Mogulof said campus has not yet been served with the lawsuit.

“(Campus is) trying to confuse people who don’t understand that service is a technicality that sometimes is not required, and was not required by the judge,” People’s Park Council member Maxina Ventura alleged in an email. “But their having been named in the lawsuit as a party is long done, just as the judge requested.”

Ventura further alleged campus has a history of “huge deception,” noting the time campus enrolled roughly 10,000 more students than stated in their 2005 Long Range Development Plan, or LRDP, as well as campus’s use of “vague, vague” language in the 2021 LRDP.

The mayor declined to comment due to this being pending litigation.

“Democracy has been ravaged to make way for UCB’s relentless expansion,” People’s Park Council member Joe Liesner alleged in an email. “UC is not a good neighbor and shows an intent to swallow up the Southside and… we can’t (curtail) their appetite.”

Contact Karen Vo at [email protected], and follow her on Twitter at @karenvo_DC.
LAST UPDATED

FEBRUARY 10, 2022


Related Articles

featured article
The mandate went into effect Tuesday and will apply to patrons of restaurants, gyms and any business holding indoor events of more than 500 people.
The mandate went into effect Tuesday and will apply to patrons of restaurants, gyms and any business holding indoor events of more than 500 people.
featured article
featured article
The Berkeley City Council heard updates on climate goals in a regular meeting Tuesday bracketed by a large showing from city labor unions alleging the city had not honored labor contracts.
The Berkeley City Council heard updates on climate goals in a regular meeting Tuesday bracketed by a large showing from city labor unions alleging the city had not honored labor contracts.
featured article
featured article
Firestone Complete Auto Care reached a $4 million settlement with prosecutors Friday over allegations that the business maintained unlawful waste management practices at 183 locations across California.
Firestone Complete Auto Care reached a $4 million settlement with prosecutors Friday over allegations that the business maintained unlawful waste management practices at 183 locations across California.
featured article